28 Comments

  1. TA-MajestyPalm on

    Graphic by me, created in excel. Source dataset here: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/popest/2020s-total-metro-and-micro-statistical-areas.html

    I thought it would be interesting to compare metro area populations of US cities, and try and group them into “Tiers” (large, medium, small etc). People often talk about living in a “small” or “large” city.

    For each population tier I simply divided the population threshold by 2, starting from 12 million. Obviously the cutoff points are subjective. The bars are scaled to population.

  2. I think it’s funny that Providence, RI has over 500k more people than the state of Rhode Island. The ‘metro area’ calulation might be a little over tuned lol

  3. lmao so we’re just redefining “small” and “medium” cities now? Small is generally anything over 5-10k (depending on source) and over 100k is usually medium

    Maybe using “metros” instead of cities would work better.

  4. Interesting. My city has about 160k and I always said I live in a small city.

    Apparently the metro area is about 450k and still doesn’t make the list.

  5. Orlando, Lakeland, and Tampa all showing up here is fascinating. Increasingly this is just a single huge urban area stretching from coast-to-coast in central
    Florida.

  6. It continues to blow my mind that anyone uses MSAs for anything other than mocking the federal government’s statisticians.

  7. Virginia Beach is about 450k. The Hampton Roads metro area has the 1.8 million that is mentioned.

  8. Late_Huckleberry850 on

    This is a much better metric for the ‘city’ feel than raw city population. Very cool!

  9. Love this graphic.

    I would say that some ‘Large’ cities like Boston and SF and Seattle, feel more like ‘Very Large’ cities. Tampa probably feels more like a ‘Medium’ city as well.

    A lot of people are pointing out the weirdness of things like SF and San Jose being separate metro areas (or LA and Riverside), but the Census does have Combined Statistical Areas (CSAs) for those ‘larger’ definitions. The issue with using CSAs instead is they are *extremely* broad in some cases and would just piss people off even more – things like NYC including Trenton, Boston including Providence, Portland including Salem, etc. There is no happy medium unfortunately, at least one thats officially defined and measured.

  10. PuzzledPurpleUnicorn on

    As someone who lives in southern California, riverside is not that big. Are they including all of riverside and orange counties or something like that?

  11. Comfortable-Reason-7 on

    LA feels like a fake big city – you have to drive everywhere. Chicago and NYC are the only true “big cities” in my opinion.

  12. Interesting, Honolulu “feels” like it has a higher population due to the geography and how crammed in everyone is. Tons of giant condo tower blocks and houses stacked up right next to each other. Also the H1 has way more lanes than many larger cities I’ve been in.

  13. The Data is wrong. “Dallas” is 1.3 million, but DFW (Dallas – Fort Worth) is 8.3 million. So they have counted a metroplex/twin city as just “Dallas”.

  14. turb0_encapsulator on

    they separated Riverside from Los Angeles and San Francisco from San Jose. Those areas are. bigger if you combine them.

  15. if you want to update it I’d recommend doing tiers based on density

    And of course the suburbs shouldnt count