
See the comments section for the figures relevant to the title information.
~~~
For those unaware, PR-RCV (or STV) is considered in political science to be the gold-standard electoral system for electing representatives to a city council, which is what New York City voters approved its use for in the early 20th century.
It's effectively just RCV for a constituency which is electing multiple members to a council/seat.
New York City voters abruptly repealed its use in 1947 after PR-RCV (or STV) apparently helped the Communist Party get elected to multiple seats on the City Council a few years earlier.
~~~
Acronyms:
"PR-RCV" stands for "proportional-ranked-choice voting"; "PR" can also stand for "proportional representation".
"STV" stands for "single transferable vote".
"PR-RCV" and "STV" mean the same thing. They are synonyms.
Posted by StarlightDown

4 Comments
Here are the figures, per the post and the title:
https://preview.redd.it/9cj78uya3v3g1.jpeg?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e7a4b27af5ab04ba363e96a3a33853f9f0019ae4
Awesome information. It’s a shame they got rid of it.
Is this why capitalists hate STV?
Acronyms should really be defined on first use, but at least you put that at the bottom. On the whole I can’t say this is very beautiful data. Website doesn’t display well on mobile (can’t see the whole plot) and from what I see it’s bit confusing. I don’t think duplicating a portion of a series is the best way to label a section of the axis.
Also, I’m unclear on what differentiates stv from a normal election with a single vote transfered to a candidate.