‘Considerable’ concern Ireland lacks means to defend itself ahead of EU presidency role

https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2025/12/11/considerable-concern-ireland-lacks-means-to-defend-itself-ahead-of-eu-presidency-role/

Posted by Banania2020

16 Comments

  1. Estonia doesn’t have a single fighter jet – instead it has a formal military alliance with most of democratic Europe.

    Perhaps we should consider something similar? Noting that we seem to expect the UK, France et al to protect us, yet we don’t reciprocate.

  2. Diligent-Ad4777 on

    Just another attempt at trying to manufacture consent for massive, unnecessary military spending.

  3. People seem to forget we beat a world superpower before.

    We’re not going toe to toe with anyone, but if you fancy 800 years of a giant pain in the ass and eventual ass kicking, bring it!

  4. News today has a 1.7 billion budget going on defence. Should we just invest in automated drone defences? You can see the damage their capable of in Ukraine

  5. SeriesDowntown5947 on

    Concern. Yes I think so. For thosevin scandernavia baltics etc have always feared russia. So been concerned is normal. Unless ireland joins NATO that will be how it is. We need US basis in Shannon etc. UK patrols etc like elsewhere in Europe. Otherwise is as now. So what do you think. Shannon for gas storage and a big arsed airforce and navy base for 50000. That is bigger than clare.

  6. Why does EU presidency role require Ireland to have a big military? It has nothing to do with military action. Its not in charge of NATO.

  7. Countries typically have defenses in place to protect key assets.

    Key assets do not include the population.

    Here are the key assets in Ireland:

    Dublin Airport
    Baldonell
    Shannon
    Power stations and ancillary systems
    Dublin Port
    Cobh deep sea port
    And the most important by far:
    Bantry Bay

    That’s it. Nothing about protecting civilians.

    Here’s an idea that was thrown around in the eighties but is much more doable nowadays:

    Radar pickets coupled to an IADS with surface to air missile protection for key assets.

    It would be far cheaper than an Air Force, can integrate with with the UKs IADS and it would dramatically reduce the amount of personnel needed.

    It’s still going to be north of €10 billion startup and €1 billion a year. But a fully ramped up air force and navy would be €50 billion startup and €3 billion a year.

    We are really not very educated when it comes to defence.

    However appealing the IADS system would be, I would still argue that… we’d never use it.

    We only have one real key asset in the whole of the country (Bantry Bay) and a single tactical nuke would turn it into an inferno in half a second.

    No matter what we do we can’t defend against that.

  8. Connollys stance, and her subsequent landslide victory, must have really stung for a lot of the armchair generals.in here. 

  9. Reckon the pressure will, rightly, just keep ramping up.

    What if the UK say they won’t cover our skies anymore? I wouldn’t blame them, we’re sitting here, awash with cash, refusing to pay, while they have horrible budgets year after year.

    Maybe they’ll start charging for the service, tbf I think we’d have little choice but to pay up

  10. drunkandhotboy on

    More scare-mongering for gullible people. Who held the last 2 EU presidencies? Were they attacked? Do people think Russia will attack Ireland? That is not going to happen and we shouldn’t waste money on people’s delusions

  11. SavingsDimensions74 on

    Ireland is much more geo strategically important that we realise.

    It’s long past since we should have developed something resembling a credible defence force.

    Europe has started to step up.

    It is morally and strategically wrong for ireland not to do the same.