In 1972, Nixon was re-elected with 60.7% of the popular vote. His party only won 46.4% of the popular vote in Congress.

Posted by CSachen

23 Comments

  1. 1984 was somewhat similar with Reagan winning with near 60% while his party Congress downballot won less than 50%.

  2. Nixon, a Republican, signed the bill that created the EPA. Upon signing he said

    >Clean air, clean water, open spaces – these should once again be the birthright of every American.

    “Conservatives” have changed sooooo much

  3. It is important to remember that the Democratic Party in that era included many conservatives members of Congress who later would switch to the GOP over the following decades. The political alignment was different than today.

  4. FourteenBuckets on

    Lots of southern conservatives still liked their old conservative Democrat/Dixiecrat Congressfolk, but for the federal race wanted nothing to do with an anti-war Massachusetts liberal.

  5. Inevitable-Spirit491 on

    The economy was very strong and the Democratic VP candidate admitted to having undergone electroshock therapy for depression two weeks after the convention and was forced to step down. Tough hurdles for any candidate to overcome.

  6. Sea_Sheepherder_389 on

    In a sign of how different things used to be, Nixon got 84% of the vote in Floridas first congressional district .  Democrat Robert Sikes was unopposed for reelection.

    Nixon also got 80% of the vote in North Carolina’s 9th District, basically Mecklenburg County under the lines at the time.  That district, more or less the 12th, is represented by Alma Adams.

    Trivia:  only one Democrat running for the House lost in a district that voted for McGovern.  That democrat was John Kerry.

  7. lifasannrottivaetr on

    Southern politics were very different back then. More transactional, and congressmen were expected to bring in federal spending for economic development.

  8. Because Nixon’s Committee to Re-Elect the President interfered to ensure the Democrats would nominate McGovern, who was seen as the weakest candidate. This would be uncovered during Watergate, leading to Nixon’s resignation.

  9. Seattle being the only republican district in WA is pretty ironic given today’s politics.

  10. OkDistribution6931 on

    1972 is a weird anomaly of an election.

    All of the other epic EV landslides (Reagan 1984, FDR 1932 and Monroe 1820) involved a very popular incumbent running a re-election, and their opponent (to the extent there was one) was never able to overcome the baggage of their political party.

    None of that applied to 1972. Nixon was a lot of things but popular was never one of them. And the Dems, while badly divided were not radioactive. The 1972 loss was a very specific rebuke of McGovern himself, his inexperience, his failure to unite the party, his host of poor decisions (like failing to vet and then firing his VP pick). Had the party gone the more conservative route and picked Muskie instead 1972 would have been a lot closer.

  11. I’m gonna posit this is because the democrats were a LOT more conservative back then, especially culturally. The entire South was dominated by Dixiecrats.

    Nixon, while culturally conservative like the conservative wing of the democrat party, was economically more moderate which coincidentally also aligned with conservatives dems.

    He also was from California which made him more appealing to moderate and liberal republicans in the cities.

    Progressives didn’t exist as a serious political force back then. They existed in some conclaves of coastal cities and that was about it.

    This map makes a lot of sense when you think about it in the context of the time.