45 Comments

  1. OpeningCommittee5175 on

    Interesting how China and India are the only two civilizations to make it from 4000 years ago to now without pause.

  2. Had a copy as a kid. I think it would be a potentially interesting project to modernize it.

  3. a_rabid_anti_dentite on

    The eurocentrism is strong with this one. China, in particular, gets majorly shortchanged.

  4. Short_Expression7748 on

    Cool looking map but China gets the shaft in a major way (and for what it’s worth, I’m an Irish-American)

  5. fernandomlicon on

    South America -> Mexico

    what?

    also, mexico attacks the united states. i’m sorry bo, it was the other way around.

  6. sheytanelkebir on

    Why does it begin at 2000bc instead of 3500bc ? And why is Iraq split up across eras whilst other countries are showed as one throughout history ?

  7. I’m not qualified to comment on much of this map, but as a Chinese historian, this chart is awful. Chinese power at many points in this history far surpassed anywhere else in the world, and Ming Dynasty China was even arguably the most powerful place in the history of the world until the British Empire.

  8. SpideyWhiplash on

    I’m impressed and want to Thank you.🫡 Your version is much clearer than the link version you included.

  9. Rome and the Han Empire had nearly identical territories and influence, yet on this map, Rome appears to be several times wider than the Han.

  10. This image seems to suggest that the Mongols overthrew the Ming Dynasty, rather than the other way around.

  11. This is very much a post-colonial lens on history. South America, a whole ass continent filled with people for 20k years is vastly underrepresented.

    The Mayan empire goes back as far as 2000 BC and it is thought that the Inca empire was as large if not larger than any contemporaneous empires at its peak. Charles Mann’s 1491 and 1493 are excellent books for anyone that wants an updated version of North and South American history.

  12. GalacticEmperor10 on

    This is not an objective depiction of world history. Rather, it reflects world history through the lens of a Western perspective.

    The map entirely omits several major empires from the Deccan region of India, including the Satavahanas, Vakatakas, Rashtrakutas, Yadavas, and Marathas, without any mention of them. Additionally, the term Aryan invasion is inaccurate.

    It was a migration in northwest India that had minimal impact on most of India. Genetic studies have demonstrated that Steppe ancestry is present at very low levels in the majority of the Indian population.

    Finally, it is misleading to associate Hinduism exclusively with the Aryans a term that is itself a modern construct since the religion originated and evolved indigenously in India.

    The vast majority of modern day Hindus possess Ancient Ancestral South Indian (AASI) ancestry, with roots tracing back approximately 60,000 years in the Indian subcontinent.

  13. protonic_ranger on

    India and China get quite shortchanged here. Both had at times, the most wealthy and powerful empires in the world

  14. Background_Curve_526 on

    I don’t like this map because in a way it overvalues many civilizations and leaves many others behind. Many of them were very powerful and are not even reflected on the map

  15. Russia in 1100 is diabolical. Also funny how Moscow begin its rise under mongol rule, now they are very european and slavic state for themselves.

  16. heraticticboom93 on

    Worth calling out that this doesn’t include Native American history. Most of which is destroyed and lost now. Such a shame. Would be beautiful to include them in an updated version.

  17. Hasn’t it already been proven that humans have been around for far longer than what this chart would lead you believe?

  18. “Aryans invade the primitive Dravidians and introduce tribal systems”

    Was Indus Valley Civilization not discovered at that time?

  19. What the hell is the width based on? Why is china so small despite its large population and geographic size?