Can anyone please paste a English translation? Tia
Impossible-Milk-2023 on
Where exactly is it used in aviation and how?
I like night trains but 100-200 per Ticket is crazy high i agree with that. Tbh i think the money should go somewhere where the general public can benefit as a whole and not just some people that use the Malmö Train
white-tealeaf on
BĂĽrrgerliche have devoted their entire political agency to ragebait leftists at this point
Aelyonum on
I could see the point in actually saving 10M because, yes, setting up night trains is expensive. But actually using those 10M for air travel? That’s peak stupidity. Right wing is like always sacrificing our and our children’s future.
weizikeng on
The article is very vague on how that money will be spent now. All it says is “to the benefits of air travel”. It’s one thing to invest that money into say airport upgrades to make the flying experience less miserable. But if all they’re doing is subsidizing airlines or fuel then it really is a slap in the face for anyone thinking this country still cares about climate and emissions.
Side note: I do agree that spending 10 million subsidising a single train service that barely serves the country is a bit weird and misplaced. But they could’ve spent that amount to lower regular train ticket prices, such as through the reduction of track access charges.
5 Comments
Can anyone please paste a English translation? Tia
Where exactly is it used in aviation and how?
I like night trains but 100-200 per Ticket is crazy high i agree with that. Tbh i think the money should go somewhere where the general public can benefit as a whole and not just some people that use the Malmö Train
BĂĽrrgerliche have devoted their entire political agency to ragebait leftists at this point
I could see the point in actually saving 10M because, yes, setting up night trains is expensive. But actually using those 10M for air travel? That’s peak stupidity. Right wing is like always sacrificing our and our children’s future.
The article is very vague on how that money will be spent now. All it says is “to the benefits of air travel”. It’s one thing to invest that money into say airport upgrades to make the flying experience less miserable. But if all they’re doing is subsidizing airlines or fuel then it really is a slap in the face for anyone thinking this country still cares about climate and emissions.
Side note: I do agree that spending 10 million subsidising a single train service that barely serves the country is a bit weird and misplaced. But they could’ve spent that amount to lower regular train ticket prices, such as through the reduction of track access charges.