Russia Develops Area-Effect Weapon to Destroy Starlink Satellites, Intelligence Warns

https://united24media.com/latest-news/russia-develops-area-effect-weapon-to-destroy-starlink-satellites-intelligence-warns-14464

36 Comments

  1. supercyberlurker on

    Is this something Russia would actually do and risk Kessler syndrome?

    … or is this just a way for Putin to be able to put pressure on Musk, in exchange for ??

  2. Ok-Simple-6146 on

    I seriously don’t get it.

    Why the Russian government is doing this?

    Can someone give some context?

  3. SpaceX operates two LEO satellite systems. Starlink is the consumer system most people are familliar with. Starshield is a US government system paid for and operated for defense and other purposes. If Russia wants to target a system, I’m of the view that Starshield would be first on their list.

  4. Omg not starlink, and just when they were approaching the number of goverment spy satellites and not to mention all the other countries satellites…oh well I guess it’s back to fiber optics, cable and dail up.

  5. Pretty sure if Area effect space weapons are used then earth orbits become toxic to all spacecraft forever. Using a weapon like this would mean that the country is existentially desperate to survive.

  6. >Experts quoted in the report say that following an attack of this kind, the released pellets and fragments from damaged satellites would eventually fall back toward Earth, potentially striking or destabilizing other orbital systems along the way.

    No regards for terrestrial life forms.

  7. Why do i get the feeling Musk will somehow still defend Russia while attacking Ukraine + EU for this?

  8. Historical-Bar-305 on

    So it will be attack on america? And 5 article NATO or putler wants a peace deal again?

  9. Why? Russia has been caught multiple times using starlink tech with their drones. I guess its typical Russian doctrine to shoot themselves in the foot as much as their enemy? Could see that

  10. I mean, air burst nuclear weapons gave been an option on the table for close to 70 years now. Not really new, only suprise is that a military contractor like starlink isn’t hardened against such an old tech

  11. Launching this could be tantamount to an act of war with a nuclear retaliation.

    The satellites that monitor launches would begin to go offline placing nuclear states at risk of a sneak attack.

  12. Crypto_Force_X on

    Wouldn’t a huge chunk of the world starve without GPS for cargo ships?

    Not sure how Russia would survive such an attack without everyone just turning hostile on them.

  13. If Vlad and Elon get into a wrestling match in a 5th floor Moscow walk up, is it wrong to wish they both go tumbling through that window?

  14. Well, with Cheetoh in Chief in the White House, it’s the best time for the Russians to do this. Pootin can just tell his lackey to not respond.

  15. Elon’s already better at destroying Starlink satellites. Hundreds have burned up in the atmosphere this year.

  16. EfficiencyIVPickAx on

    It’s $1.5 million to orbit a spaceX satillite, and out anti-satilite missiles cost between $12-$20 million each shot. If Russia pays more to shoot them down than we do to launch them, you have to laugh.

  17. Damn, I really dont want to go back to Telus. Starlink has been the best internet service I can get for my area.

  18. they blew up the biggest bomb ever and are sending civilian after civilian as cannon fodder just so they can annex more territory. they do not care

  19. Oh gee if only we had not placed all of our eggs in Elon’s basket to let him have control over the world’s largest satellite internet network and hardware.