Population change of Eastern European countries since 1991

Posted by vladgrinch

32 Comments

  1. 🇷🇺 Russia – 148.5 ➝ 143.6 (-3.3%)

    🇺🇦 Ukraine – 51.9 ➝ 32.9 (-36.6%)

    🇧🇾 Belarus – 10.2 ➝ 9.1 (-11.1%)

    🇲🇩 Moldova – 4.3 ➝ 2.4 (-45.2%)

    🇷🇴 Romania – 23.3 ➝ 18.8 (-19.3%)

    🇵🇱 Poland – 38.4 ➝ 38.0 (-0.9%)

    🇧🇬 Bulgaria – 8.6 ➝ 6.3 (-27.3%)

    🇭🇺 Hungary – 10.4 ➝ 9.6 (-7.8%)

    🇨🇿 Czechia – 10.3 ➝ 10.9 (+5.8%)

    🇸🇰 Slovakia – 5.3 ➝ 5.4 (+2.8%)

    🇱🇹 Lithuania – 3.7 ➝ 2.9 (-21.5%)

    🇱🇻 Latvia – 2.7 ➝ 1.9 (-30.2%)

    🇪🇪 Estonia – 1.6 ➝ 1.4 (-12.2%)

    What’s driving the decline?
    Low birth rates, massive emigration, economic transitions, and — in some cases — war.

  2. preparing4exams on

    Moldovan last census doesn’t include Transnistria, that’s why the numbers look very grim (however the situation is still pretty bad, even if we add 500k~ from Transnistria)

  3. Drunkensailor1985 on

    Why did everyone leave latvia? Didn’t think they were in that bad of a state in 90s and 2000s 

  4. WontStopTheFuture on

    Poland shouldn’t be green as it’s lost population, and Estonia should have a minus not a plus sign on the number.

    But Jesus that’s catastrophic for a lot of these countries.

  5. Russia has closer to 150m when counted with unrecognized lands (Crimea, Donbass, Zaporozhye, Kherson).

  6. Curious about Czechia, what made their numbers go up like this? Emigration from the east? I would have expected that they would rather go even further west to Germany etc.

  7. genadi_brightside on

    My country is the 3rd in terms of percentage loss yet there has been no war here.

    Fuck our government and me mentality.

  8. The collapse of the USSRs effects were disastrous.

    Such a mis-managed turning point. Change was necessary to some extent, but Gorbachev really fumbled the ball and then Yeltsin murdered Russian democracy in it’s crib.

  9. Well, looking at these statistics, the Czechs could just populate all of Eastern Europe with themselves

  10. 1991 is a ridiculous time to use for the Baltic states as immediately after the end of the Soviet occupation, a shitton of the illegal Soviet colonists returned to Russia. Compared to 1989, the number of ethnic Estonians is actually down only 4.5% and Estonia’s population has been in gradual growth for about a decade, bar a few odd years.

  11. I was born not long after the fall of communism in Bulgaria and remember that the entire economy collapsed just as I was about to start primary school. It’s estimated that between 40,000 and 60,000 people were leaving the country every year throughout the nineties.

    The International Monetary Fund had to bail out the country at the end of the decade on the condition that a new EU-oriented government be elected and that the Bulgarian currency be pegged against the euro indefinitely.

    I don’t remember much of how it happened exactly but I’ve been told that organised crime flourished during those first years of experiencing democracy. My family felt like living in the Wild West so we left for the UK in 1999 and my uncle followed us in 2001.

    Emigration rates appear to slow down from 2003 onwards – this was the first year when GDP per capita reached the level it was during the communist era, which means that the economy did not develop at all between 1989 and 2003.

    I went to school with many children whose parents were eastern European immigrants, including some from Latvia and Estonia and they were almost always ethnically Russian. It sounded like they didn’t feel welcome once the Soviet Union had disappeared and they decided to start over somewhere new.

  12. I have seen a lot of people from ex-Eastern block celebrating the fall of the USSR. Good for them (Poland/Czechia etc.), bad for ex-soviet republics barring the Baltics. Even if the USSR splits a different way (still peacefully), it’s probably better thab ehat happened