That is basically enforcing Asimov’ first law of robotics. If that is already world’s strictest, it is pathetic.
lazyoldsailor on
While in America, companies can harm children and rip off consumers while getting rich as a function of ‘free speech’.
Relevant_Eye1333 on
And the tech billionaires will cry out that this is stifling ‘freedom’
Slouchingtowardsbeth on
Yes but at what cost? /s
Jota769 on
The problem here is that it’s very, very hard to actually censor and put guardrails on generative AI. There’s almost always a way to force it to generate censored content.
94358io4897453867345 on
Still too permissive
Zweckbestimmung on
Great!
We used to have china manufactures, Europe regulates, USA buys.
Now we have
China manufactures, regulates, and buys
Hypervisory on
Fallguy for the one-child policy; absolutely perfect if you ask me.
Taluca_me on
Now we need this everywhere, then more regulations for AI to stop misinformation from spreading all over the internet
Practical_Smell_4244 on
AI tells people to unexist themselves?!?!?! Did this really happen ?!?!?!?
piratecheese13 on
Here’s the problem: there’s billions of humans, so when 1 human does something wrong, you put them in jail and they either learn from the consequences or go back to jail
You can’t do that with AI. Once training is complete, the model is kinda baked in. [The mechahitler incident](https://youtu.be/r_9wkavYt4Y?si=llebH1CIG-TKdATb) clearly shows that attempts to tweak ai manually often result in gross exaggeration.
So what do you do to enforce this? Jail employees? Would you jail a parent for the crimes of a child? Levy a fine? If you make enough profit, it becomes a license to break the law.
The only possible solution is to demand that the LLM be completely retrained with more suicide prevention training data, and that’s really fucking expensive. It’s also metaphorically the death penalty.
icbint on
Current AI is inherently non deterministic so good luck
PM_ME_DNA on
Yea let simp for a surveillance state monitoring everyone’s usage. That’s going to be ok
13 Comments
That is basically enforcing Asimov’ first law of robotics. If that is already world’s strictest, it is pathetic.
While in America, companies can harm children and rip off consumers while getting rich as a function of ‘free speech’.
And the tech billionaires will cry out that this is stifling ‘freedom’
Yes but at what cost? /s
The problem here is that it’s very, very hard to actually censor and put guardrails on generative AI. There’s almost always a way to force it to generate censored content.
Still too permissive
Great!
We used to have china manufactures, Europe regulates, USA buys.
Now we have
China manufactures, regulates, and buys
Fallguy for the one-child policy; absolutely perfect if you ask me.
Now we need this everywhere, then more regulations for AI to stop misinformation from spreading all over the internet
AI tells people to unexist themselves?!?!?! Did this really happen ?!?!?!?
Here’s the problem: there’s billions of humans, so when 1 human does something wrong, you put them in jail and they either learn from the consequences or go back to jail
You can’t do that with AI. Once training is complete, the model is kinda baked in. [The mechahitler incident](https://youtu.be/r_9wkavYt4Y?si=llebH1CIG-TKdATb) clearly shows that attempts to tweak ai manually often result in gross exaggeration.
So what do you do to enforce this? Jail employees? Would you jail a parent for the crimes of a child? Levy a fine? If you make enough profit, it becomes a license to break the law.
The only possible solution is to demand that the LLM be completely retrained with more suicide prevention training data, and that’s really fucking expensive. It’s also metaphorically the death penalty.
Current AI is inherently non deterministic so good luck
Yea let simp for a surveillance state monitoring everyone’s usage. That’s going to be ok