I thought the whole point of the thing was that it’s modular nature let them replace sections as they needed replacing, and it would stay in use perpetually.
sojuz151 on
How the space flight to LEO looks has changed a lot in the last 15 years. Falcon 9 has drastically decreased the costs, while Dragon 2 is so much better design for space station resuply and crew rotation than the Shuttle.
Those new stations are smaller, but this is expected. Not only is a big portion of NASA’s focus on the moon, but also ISS did not deliver much of scientific value for how much did it cost to build and operate.
Major_Wayland on
The only thing I hope is that space station programs would not break onto “Western” and “China + allies” ones. But sadly, its more and more likely.
3 Comments
I thought the whole point of the thing was that it’s modular nature let them replace sections as they needed replacing, and it would stay in use perpetually.
How the space flight to LEO looks has changed a lot in the last 15 years. Falcon 9 has drastically decreased the costs, while Dragon 2 is so much better design for space station resuply and crew rotation than the Shuttle.
Those new stations are smaller, but this is expected. Not only is a big portion of NASA’s focus on the moon, but also ISS did not deliver much of scientific value for how much did it cost to build and operate.
The only thing I hope is that space station programs would not break onto “Western” and “China + allies” ones. But sadly, its more and more likely.