Man is jailed for sexually assaulting woman in “random and violent” attack – News – Waterford News & Star

https://www.waterford-news.ie/news/man-is-jailed-for-sexually-assaulting-woman-in-random-and-violent-attack_arid-82581.html?fbclid=IwdGRjcAPD2NhjbGNrA8PYUGV4dG4DYWVtAjExAHNydGMGYXBwX2lkDDM1MDY4NTUzMTcyOAABHhe0rzJ-VI9arqIDn9h-inPtb1zJNxmd0_bmYf159fbMo_Gk6OEam7U33S1R_aem_MjLikp0whXWcyyp2OWanMA

Posted by IrishHistory26

14 Comments

  1. IrishHistory26 on

    Claimed he was an asylum seeker from Syria, actually from Jordan. His asylum application has been thrown out.

  2. CurrencyDesperate286 on

    “The man, who is originally from Jordan, and now living in Ireland of no fixed abode, is currently serving a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence for a very similar sexual assault which he committed on a woman in her 40s in Dublin within days of the Waterford attack.”

    I would hope his abode is pretty fixed at whatever prison he’s in.

  3. ameriCANCERvative on

    These random and violent sexual assaulting men and these random and violent out-of-control pitbulls are making the rest of us men and pitbulls look bad.

  4. Broad-Ganache9123 on

    The horrible thing about this is that he’ll be released and free to wander the Streets, claim his benefits, etc.

    Should be immediately deported and banned from the EU for life.

    We need an immigration detention center for these animals. It will keep happening unless they do something about it.

  5. This is getting tiring. When is Ireland going to get a grip with the influx of these people

  6. I might regret weighing in … but here goes.

    So, I don’t agree that deportation is the answer. There is no punishment/justice/conviction in deporting someone. Surely, if the offence was committed in Ireland then the sentence should be served out in Ireland in accordance with Irish policies.

    Otherwise, what, someone is found guilty of a serious offence, put on a plane, and they walk away? Deportation isn’t extradition, nor can a sentence passed down in one jurisdiction be transferred to another.

    Consider it this way – it was not that country’s court that found them guilty, so why should a foreign court decide they should serve time in another country’s prison? The system that convicts someone of a crime then oversees their sentence, they can’t instruct another system to do it on their behalf, that’s not how these things work.

    Besides, is it not the case that once the sentence is served, the individual would be deported anyway?

    Anyway, all I’m trying to say is, if you think about it for 30 seconds, turning this into an immigration discussion is irrelevant. It’s not applicable in how convictions or sentences are handed down.

    But then again, if we don’t turn everything into an immigration issue, how will the trolls ever get their rocks off? …