How Asian and Middle Eastern capital has shifted post-COVID and post-Brexit, and what it signals about future investor confidence.
This is the fourth in a series of three from Dr Victor
Chukwuemeka (pictured below), the founder of Edgewise CRE. He is
an economist, trader, researcher and teacher. Edgewise CRE is a
research platform which translates global economic and real
estate trends into actionable insight for investors.
Â
Dr Victor Chukwuemeka
For decades, cross-border investment has been a defining feature
of the UK commercial real estate market. London’s transparency,
legal consistency and deep liquidity made it a natural
destination for Asian and Middle Eastern capital. Yet the
combined effects of Brexit, the pandemic, interest-rate
volatility and shifting geopolitical alignments have reshaped
that landscape. To understand investor confidence today, it is
necessary to look at how these flows have evolved.
Before 2020, the UK enjoyed extraordinary global participation.
JLL data shows that overseas buyers accounted for more than half
of all UK commercial real estate investment between 2014 and
2019. Asian investors from Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea and
mainland China were particularly active, while Middle Eastern
sovereign funds consistently targeted core London offices, hotels
and long-lease assets. Yields compressed, liquidity was
plentiful, and international capital acted as a stabilising force
even when domestic sentiment wavered.
The pandemic brought that era to a sudden halt. Travel
restrictions froze due diligence and site visits, and global
cross-border volumes fell sharply. MSCI estimates that
international investment into UK CRE dropped by over 40 per cent
in 2020. When markets reopened, it became clear that the recovery
was uneven across regions.
Asian capital behaved in a notably differentiated way.
Singaporean investors rebounded the fastest, taking advantage of
repricing in offices and logistics. South Korean institutions,
once major buyers of London offices, slowed their activity due to
refinancing pressures at home and currency volatility. Mainland
Chinese investment, which had already been curtailed by domestic
capital controls, remained subdued and became even more selective
amid global geopolitical tensions. In short, Asia remained a
substantial contributor, but with a very different composition
from the pre-COVID period.
Middle Eastern capital, by contrast, proved more resilient.
Knight Frank recorded multi-year highs for investment from the
Gulf into UK CRE in 2022–23. Elevated oil revenues in 2022
supported renewed outbound activity, and diversification agendas,
particularly those linked to long-term national strategies such
as Vision 2030, kept the UK firmly on the radar. What has changed
is the style of deployment. Rather than limiting themselves to
large trophy assets, Middle Eastern investors have increasingly
targeted logistics, residential rental housing and life-science
clusters, reflecting a more strategic orientation towards
structural growth sectors.
Post-Brexit dynamics also evolved in ways that defied initial
concerns. While there was a period of hesitation in the immediate
aftermath, the UK’s fundamental advantages, transparent legal
systems, institutional credibility and strong governance remained
intact. For a significant share of investors from Asia and the
Middle East, currency movements stemming from Brexit created an
unexpected opportunity: CBRE notes that sterling weakness in both
2016 and 2022 effectively delivered discounts of 10-15 per cent
for US dollar-pegged or AED-pegged investors. Today, Brexit is
rarely cited as a deal-breaker; most view it as a political
recalibration rather than a structural impairment of the UK’s
real-estate value proposition.
Interest-rate volatility in 2022 and 2023 became a more powerful
filter for inbound capital. Rising gilt yields pushed borrowing
costs to their strongest levels in over ten years, reducing the
ability of leveraged buyers to transact. Asian and Middle Eastern
investors, many of whom deploy higher equity proportions or use
less debt, were less constrained and maintained their ability to
execute.
However, this environment has made underwriting more disciplined.
Investors now demand clearer visibility on rental growth, more
robust tenant covenants and stronger downside protection.
Confidence remains, but it is expressed through more selective
deployment.
These shifts have also changed where capital flows. Investor
appetite for logistics and industrial property remains intact due
to the enduring relevance of e-commerce and supply-chain
resilience. Life sciences, particularly in the
London-Oxford-Cambridge triangle, have gained prominence as
investors look to innovation-linked sectors. Residential rental
assets have become increasingly attractive, reflecting the UK’s
structural housing undersupply and stable income profiles.
Even the hospitality sector has re-emerged, particularly for
Middle Eastern investors who see value created by currency
positioning and recovering tourism. Traditional offices, by
contrast, face greater scrutiny, and international buyers now
differentiate sharply between prime, ESG-compliant assets and
older stock requiring repositioning.
Taken together, the data suggests several conclusions about
future investor confidence. Appetite for the UK remains intact
but has become more discriminating. Domestic conditions in source
countries, from refinancing pressures in Korea to capital-control
dynamics in China, now play a larger role in determining outbound
flows. At the same time, the UK’s competitive advantages remain
highly durable. Transparency, liquidity and global connectivity
continue to set it apart from markets with weaker governance or
higher regulatory opacity.
The dominant trend is not retreat, but reallocation. Cross-border
investors have adjusted sector exposure, refined underwriting
criteria and focused on long-term structural themes instead of
reacting to short-term volatility. Asian and Middle Eastern
capital has not stepped back from the UK; it has simply become
more targeted, more strategic and more selective.
The map of capital flows has undoubtedly changed, but the
underlying message is one of continued, if recalibrated
confidence. For those who grasp the dynamics shaping this market,
the opportunities in UK CRE remain compelling.