New Research from BCG, IMD Business School, and the World Economic Forum Reveals That While Executive Awareness Is High, Most Companies Lack Embedded Structures to Act on Geopolitical Risk and Opportunity

    DAVOS, Switzerland, Jan. 12, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — In 2025, global policy uncertainty reached a 20-year peak, more than four times higher than during the global financial crisis and around 50% above COVID-19 levels. Senior executives now cite trade reconfiguration, weakening multilateral institutions, and the weaponization of economic tools as persistent threats to business continuity and competitiveness. As geopolitical disruption becomes a defining feature of global business, most companies still lack the ability to systematically anticipate, assess, and respond to these risks, with less than 20% of companies having created a dedicated geopolitics department.

    Boston Consulting Group logo (PRNewsfoto/The Boston Consulting Group)

    Boston Consulting Group logo (PRNewsfoto/The Boston Consulting Group)

    These are among the findings of a new white paper published today by IMD Business School and the World Economic Forum in collaboration with Boston Consulting Group and BCG’s Center for Geopolitics. Titled Building Geopolitical Muscle: How Companies Turn Insights into Strategic Advantage, the paper draws on 56 interviews with senior executives across industries and geographies. Some participants agreed to share their experience publicly, and their cases are profiled in nine examples from around the world.

    The paper reveals that while geopolitical topics have climbed up the corporate agenda—particularly since COVID-19 and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine—most firms remain in a reactive posture and continue to treat geopolitics episodically. Leadership attention is high, but embedded routines to link geopolitical developments to core business metrics and actions remain rare.

    “Too many companies treat geopolitics as a headline issue rather than a business capability,” said Nikolaus Lang, Global Leader of the BCG Henderson Institute, Chair of BCG’s Center for Geopolitics, and coauthor of the report. “That model is no longer sustainable. The frequency and simultaneity of shocks now demand geopolitical muscle—the institutionalized ability to sense, reoptimize, and act at scale systematically.”

    Other key findings include:

    • The direct or indirect effects of major geopolitical developments are now felt across all regions. The top factors cited by companies interviewed for the study were: US policy volatility and tariffs, the Russia-Ukraine war, US-China rivalry, and European competitiveness.

    • Geopolitics has long been the purview of the board and CEO, but leadership alone no longer has the bandwidth to manage the speed and scale of today’s disruptions. Dedicated geopolitical capabilities are now required, and teams with direct access to leadership are more likely to influence outcomes.

    • There is no single blueprint for mainstreaming geopolitics. While more than half of the companies interviewed locate their geopolitical capability within government or corporate affairs, firms pursue different operating models such as task forces, senior advisers, and full-time dedicated teams.

    • The usefulness of emerging AI tools for geopolitical sensing remains limited. Most companies still rely on manual curation or consultant summaries to filter noise. As these tools mature, however, they may increasingly support early-warning systems, scenario generation, and rapid briefing production.

    • The ability to connect geopolitical developments to corporate value creation and express them in standard commercial, financial, or operational terms is a prerequisite for relevance. Without this bridge, even strong geopolitical awareness remains disconnected from action.

    Story Continues

    Share.

    Comments are closed.