Starmer faces calls to cancel King’s US visit over Trump’s Greenland threats

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/starmer-cancel-king-united-states-visit-trump-greenland-b1267006.html

Posted by tylerthe-theatre

24 Comments

  1. Thebritishdovah on

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump tries to buy the palace in return for lifting tariffs and us bending over for the US as usual.

  2. Even if the threats to greenland isn’t considered justification enough, the direct tariff threats should be.

  3. I’m normally inclined to let the royals and the politicians suck it up to the US: it’s their job…but this time around we need to push back vigorously. A royal snub would be the perfect first step.

  4. iloovehugecock on

    I was on board with this visit initially, as I considered it an unfortunate but necessary diplomatic exercise to keep the psychotic paedophile on our side. But I would fully support rescinding the offer and telling him to fuck off until he stops bullying supposed ‘allies’.

    He has shown time and time again that buttering him up gets you nowhere. He will just rip up and renege on whatever agreement was made when he thinks of something else he wants to extort from us.

    Appeasement does not work. You just end up contorting yourself further and further in knots trying to satisfy them while getting absolutely nothing in return.

  5. I don’t think that would be wise. Charles is probably the person from the UK that can gain the most respect from Trump and have a hope in hell using soft power to get the trade deal back up and running and discuss the tariffs. He’d be more likely to secure a positive outcome than Starmer, especially as he can keep neutral media wise.

    Deciding to cancel the visit just damages the chances with no real positive outcome (it’s not like it would change Trumps actions) he’d probably just throw a huff and double down on it.

  6. We’re beyond the “Lets talk him down” and “Let’s try to reason with him” point. There’s only one way to deal with this lunatic now and we all know what that way is

  7. At this point, Charles’s visit to the US looks more like appeasement than anything else.

  8. I don’t know how your country works but he can’t cancel his visit can he? Isn’t Charles the head of state would be like the guy who cuts the grass at the white house telling Trump he is not allowed to perv on teenage girls.

  9. A US visit just seems stomach churning awful now.

    I don’t care if Trump backs down later – there needs to be some tangible consequences for making the threat in the first place – and cancelling all Royal visits seems a good first step.

  10. theaveragemillenial on

    Cancelling the kings visit out of some moral high ground is short sighted.

    The king going and using soft power is the correct move geopolitical isn’t always hard people.

    Especially when you are dealing with Trump…

  11. Cynical_Classicist on

    He should, but I suspect that he’s too much of a coward, who still listens to that Glasman crap about how Trump is key to winning the working class. We can’t work with Trump. The fascist takes our attempts to butter him up and screws us over.

  12. baronvonpenguin on

    Why are we sending our head of state to a hostile country that just kidnapped another head of state?

  13. The petty side of me think that since we wasted loads of money on a pointless visit from them, they should do the same back.

  14. Simplyobsessed2 on

    Didn’t Charles have to pause his cancer treatment for a trip to Australia? If he has to do that again he should cancel. Not worth it.

  15. Why are we rolling out the red carpet for a complete nincompoop… he’s a donkey ape that deserves no pomp and pageantry.

    It’s like rewarding your kid for doing something naughty rather than gentle but stern behaviour realignment.

  16. The problem is Trump is a giant toddler, doing this will make him sulk and a act worse. Probably better to let the King try and talk to him at least once, and if it doesn’t work then cancel future meetings.

  17. thickwhiteduck on

    Starmer must feel like a right chump after rolling out the red carpet for the cunt, then having his promised trade deal cancelled and now realising the US is not even a proper ally any more. Rejoin the EU FFS.

  18. Ok-Employee383 on

    As Trump wants to be a king, being around kings gives him a boner. Maybe King Charles can tell him stuff only kings can. Like ‘touch Greenland and Epstein will be the least of your worries’.

  19. Charles really isn’t very bright. In fact, the royals are pretty much unanimously thick and rely on their “people” to tell them what to say. Charlie is a pro fox hunting adulterer who once lobbied for homeopathy to be available on the NHS

    On second thoughts maybe he and Donnie do get on…

  20. Nah, Trump loves royalty. King Chuck is one of the few people on the planet who can potentially make him see sense.