Close Menu
    Wikipedia turns 25, still boasting zero ads and over 7 billion visitors per month despite the rise of AI and threats of government repression
    Technology

    Wikipedia turns 25, still boasting zero ads and over 7 billion visitors per month despite the rise of AI and threats of government repression


    Wikipedia turns 25, still boasting zero ads and over 7 billion visitors per month despite the rise of AI and threats of government repression

    https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/wikipedia-turns-25-still-boasting-zero-ads-and-over-7-billion-visitors-per-month-despite-the-rise-of-ai-and-threats-of-government-repression/

    View 31 Comments

    31 Comments

    1. Secret_Wishbone_2009 on

      I have to say it is a rare beacon on the internet, although someone is going to explain to me how i am wrong

    3. BugmoonGhost on

      I appreciate many are bots but the anti Wikipedia online trolls really are the worst. It’s not perfect, something like this can’t be but it’s such an obvious good thing.

    4. zwd_2011 on

      Support these people financially, like I do every year. It’s one of the last bastions of factual information.

      Yes, AI (especially Google AI) steals shamelessly from Wikipedia, but there has been talk the IA platforms will pay Wikipedia for that. That will be the end of Wikipedia. It’s naive to think those platforms will not use their money to influence content or shove commercials at some point.

      Tip: search in Wiki directly. Type -AI after a search in google, to skip the theft.

    5. Big_Mc-Large-Huge on

      For those of you with a homelab, look into self hosting Wikipedia too. It takes up about 150gigs of disk space if you include media files like images etc. less if text only

    7. celeryandcucumber on

      I think the bigger achievement is that they have not sold out so far.

      I can imagine plenty of companies have knocked on their door the past 25 years to buy them out.

    10. cyberpumpkin on

      I know it’s not perfect, but I do have more trust in it than I do a lot of the media.

    12. Jackson_Cook on

      I occasionally donate to them. Worth every penny. Where else can you find such a wealth of knowledge complete with citations?

    16. willow_you_idiot on

      Everyone make sure to donate to them! Even a couple of bucks matters when millions of us donate.

    18. ihateusedusernames on

      I rarely use the generic Google search as my primary. I use my Wikipedia app for most searches – 90% of what I want to at any moment is in the first Wikipedia article that comes up.

      It is far more efficient, cleaner, faster, well-written, and trustworthy than any generic Google search I do (and I don’t have to use booleans to clean up the results!)

    21. lord_satellite on

      I stand behind my opinion that Wikipedia is one of the most important inventions in history and especially when it comes to the Internet.

    22. god_damnit_reddit on

      i love wikipedia and use it literally all the time. and i do appreciate that they aren’t like taking money from other companies to shill other company products.

      but.

      as a user, being blasted with a full screen WE NEED MORE DONATIONS TO SAVE YOU FROM ADS every other week, sort of feels like there are ads. they’re just internal promotions rather than external ones lol.

    23. aaaaaaaarrrrrgh on

      No ads, just full screen donation interstitials for at least a month each year, with the fundraising goal rising not based on needs but rather on how much they think they can get. (Edit to add:) and some [“limited” “test” banners](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fundraising#:~:text=To%20ensure%20we%20gather%20sufficient,on%20a%20single%20browser/device) shown “only” 12 times over the rest of the year (for each device that you have, assuming you don’t delete cookies, and assuming it works properly).

      At least they stopped misleading people as blatantly (for many years, the donation ads suggested that unless YOU donate your last shirt RIGHT NOW, Wikipedia will have to shut down, rather than “we got [more than enough money to run the site in perpetuity](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Endowment) but would like to organize more events etc.”).

    27. m00nWiZARD on

      Every time Wikipedia asks me for money, I give them a couple dollars. If there’s any organization on the internet that deserves my money, it’s them

    28. RobutNotRobot on

      I remember when it first came out, people were vandalizing posts just for fun and then pointing at it and laughing

      Now we have clickbait sites where 80% of the people get most of their news from that are so much more unreliable than the community curated posts on Wikipedia.