I did a “for fun” survey here at r/portugal on who they voted for in the Presidential Elections (1st round).

  • Sample: 356 responses
  • Form window: 18/01/2026 18:50–19:59
  • Valid votes in the survey (excludes “White” and “I didn’t vote”): 342

Obvious but important note: this is not representative of the country (self-selection + Reddit demographics). It is a photograph of subset of users who responded.


Survey results

Valid votes (excludes “White” and “I didn’t vote”)

Candidate Votes %
João Cotrim de Figueiredo 141 41.23
António José Seguro 127 37.13
Andre Ventura 20 5.85
Manuel João Vieira 20 5.85
Antonio Filipe 13 3.80
Henrique Gouveia e Melo 9 2.63
Catarina Martins 5 1.46
Luís Marques Mendes 4 1.17
Jorge Pinto 3 0.88

Comparison with official results (SGMAI) — % in valid votes

Candidate Survey (%) Official (%) Difference (pp)
João Cotrim de Figueiredo 41.23 16.00 +25.23
António José Seguro 37.13 31.11 +6.02
Andre Ventura 5.85 23.52 -17.67
Manuel João Vieira 5.85 1.08 +4.77
Antonio Filipe 3.80 1.64 +2.16
Henrique Gouveia e Melo 2.63 12.32 -9.69
Catarina Martins 1.46 2.06 -0.60
Luís Marques Mendes 1.17 11.30 -10.13
Jorge Pinto 0.88 0.68 +0.20
André Pestana da Silva 0.00 0.19 -0.19
Humberto Correia 0.00 0.08 -0.08

Main differences

  • O r/portugal (who responded) it became much more IL than the country: Cotrim +25.23 pp vs official
  • Ventura appears far below the country: -17.67 pp.
  • Insurance appears above the country: +6.02 pp.
  • Brands Mendes e Gouveia e Melo appear far below the country: around -10 pp each.

Sample profile (to notice bias)

Age

Age n %
25 – 34 223 62.6
35 – 44 64 18.0
18 – 24 63 17.7
45 – 54 5 1.4
55 – 64 1 0.3

Sex

Sex n %
Masculine 309 86.8
Feminine 42 11.8
I prefer not to say 5 1.4

Marital status

Marital status n %
Single 248 69.7
Married 49 13.8
De facto union 49 13.8
I prefer not to say 5 1.4
Widower 3 0.8
Divorced 2 0.6

Educational qualifications

Literary Qualifications n %
Master’s degree 151 42.4
Degree 106 29.8
University Attendance 44 12.4
12th year 30 8.4
Ph.D 22 6.2
9th year 2 0.6
Primary 1 0.3

Vote by demographics (top 3 by group)

Percentages within the group and calculated on valid votes (excludes “White” and “I didn’t vote”). Very small groups can give “weird” results.

Sex

Sex n 1.º 2.º 3.º
Feminine 42 António José Seguro (47.6%) João Cotrim de Figueiredo (28.6%) Manuel João Vieira (11.9%)
Masculine 295 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (43.7%) António José Seguro (36.3%) André Ventura (6.1%)
I prefer not to say 5 António Filipe (40.0%) Manuel João Vieira (20.0%) / Catarina Martins (20.0%) / Luís Marques Mendes (20.0%)

Age

Age n 1.º 2.º 3.º
18 – 24 60 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (35.0%) António José Seguro (33.3%) André Ventura (11.7%)
25 – 34 214 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (46.3%) António José Seguro (36.0%) Manuel João Vieira (4.7%)
35 – 44 62 António José Seguro (48.4%) João Cotrim de Figueiredo (29.0%) Manuel João Vieira (9.7%)
45 – 54 5 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (60.0%) Henrique Gouveia e Melo (20.0%) / André Ventura (20.0%)
55 – 64 1 André Ventura (100.0%)

Marital status

Marital status n 1.º 2.º 3.º
Single 240 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (40.4%) António José Seguro (40.0%) Manuel João Vieira (5.0%)
De facto union 48 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (41.7%) António José Seguro (37.5%) Manuel João Vieira (10.4%)
Married 44 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (47.7%) António José Seguro (27.3%) André Ventura (11.4%)
Divorced 2 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (50.0%) / André Ventura (50.0%)
Widower 3 Manuel João Vieira (33.3%) / André Ventura (33.3%) / Luís Marques Mendes (33.3%)
I prefer not to say 5 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (40.0%) Manuel João Vieira (20.0%) / Catarina Martins (20.0%) / António José Seguro (20.0%)

Educational qualifications

Qualifications n 1.º 2.º 3.º
Master’s degree 148 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (43.2%) António José Seguro (41.9%) António Filipe (4.1%)
Degree 100 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (39.0%) António José Seguro (31.0%) Manuel João Vieira (7.0%) / António Filipe (7.0%) / André Ventura (7.0%)
University Attendance 41 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (51.2%) António José Seguro (34.1%) Manuel João Vieira (7.3%)
12th year 30 João Cotrim de Figueiredo (46.7%) António José Seguro (40.0%) André Ventura (6.7%)
Ph.D 20 António José Seguro (40.0%) André Ventura (20.0%) Manuel João Vieira (15.0%) / João Cotrim de Figueiredo (15.0%)
9th year 2 Henrique Gouveia e Melo (50.0%) / Manuel João Vieira (50.0%)
Primary 1 Luís Marques Mendes (100.0%)

Methodology

  • Voluntary survey (Google Forms), without weighting and without strong control of multiple responses.
  • Correct interpretation: preferences of those who responded in the r/portugalnot “country survey”.

Analysis

The difference compared to the national result is not surprising: the sample here was very masculine (86.8%), very concentrated in 18–34 (80%+) and with high education (typical profile of r/portugal). This tends to strongly favor certain voting profiles and push others away.

The three clearest conclusions: – Cotrim dominates the survey (41.23% of those valid) and is far above of the country (+25.23 pp), especially in 25–34.
Ventura fica far below of the country (-17.67 pp) in this sample. – Insurance appears above of the country (+6.02 pp) and is particularly strong in 35–44 and no female vote.

https://i.redd.it/5ktb5bmbnjeg1.png

Posted by TitusRex

8 Comments

  1. Inquérito e análise interessante mais a janela foi muito pequena, apenas 1h para responder e logo no próprio dia das eleições não dá um resultado muito representativo na minha opinião.

  2. Prudent-Constant-246 on

    O meu sonho é saber mexer num programa assim para analisar estatística, o que usaste? SPSS?

  3. Acho que o mais interessante disto para mim é a desigualdade de géneros, que se ouve falar muito lá fora e parece ter chegado aqui também (ou já existia e eu não sabia?): homens votam mais à direita, mulheres votam mais à esquerda (se bem que há 6x mais homens do que mulheres aqui, portanto não é exatamente representativo). Se o sub tivesse o mesmo número de homens e mulheres, o Seguro tinha 42% e o Cotrim 36%.

  4. Old-Firefighter3332 on

    Não percebo a atração dos jovens com educação superior pelo Cotrim. É uma questão essencialmente tributária?