Andy Burnham latest: Burnham takes on Starmer as he confirms Westminster comeback bid to become MP
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/andy-burnham-keir-starmer-manchester-mayor-deadline-latest-updates-b2906946.html
Posted by stopdontpanick
27 Comments
What are the chances he still gets blocked by Starmer / the NEC. A lot of MPs (including some high profile ones) have come out and said he should be allowed to stand if the local members select him.
Blocking him now would be quite a toxic move, which would be made even worse if the selected Labour candidate then goes on to lose.
I’ve not voted Labour since 2015. However, I think it makes sense for Andy being only one who can take over. Leaving Starmer in till locals just going to hurt candidates. He has to go soon.
I think Labour and Burnham are over estimating his popularity. He could become leader on the ‘not Starmer’ vote, but, I don’t think he will be any more popular than Starmer with the general public
Blocking him is a bad move by the party.
Letting him run and undermine the government is a bad move by the party.
As always, the center left always find a way to set up a circular firing squad.
Genuinely, why is he applying to contest the By-election such big news on the beeb at the moment? I feel quite out of the loop on this.
The smart move would be to allow him back into Westminster and immediately appoint him as Deputy PM.
An utterly idiotic move that undermines the work he’s been doing in Manchester AND risks undermining and undoing the good work Labour have been doing in government.
The media will not be able to throw the ‘North London Liberal Elite’ accusation at him. He is popular in the North West. I think that he will be a good PM.
Andy Burnham only really seems like a potential Labour leader because the press have built him into one. There are plenty of Labour politicians who have similar or bigger public profiles which aren’t largely based on the press saying they’re a potential party leader.
What kind of person looks at what is going on in the world at the moment and thinks…”yeah I want to deal with Trump, the Ukraine war and the rise of fascism again. I’m good enough.”
How cocky do you have to be? I wouldn’t want to be Starmer for all of the money in the world.
This is looking SO ugly and I really lost a lot of respect for Burnham. Who does he think he is? Saviour complex or something. Starmer is stabilising and clawing back popularity. And who cares about popularity anyway, we need a stable gov until the next election. I really cannot stand the backbenchers and frothing (uninformed, loud mouthed, illogical) lefties who are the main ones undermining the first social democratic and progressive government of my lifetime. Really cannot stand them any more, and I used to agree so much with them.
It would be hilarious if he didn’t even get elected
In his letter to the NEC, Burnham insisted he would be in Parliament “to support the work of the government, not undermine it”.
Starting out with such a brazen and obvious lie isn’t a great look tbh.
Clearly, there are moves against Starmer, the MP who stood down, was caught out acting like an arsehole, and now is playing the sick card. No doubt he has been paid off very nicely by tax fiddler Angel, who wants her pound of flesh even though she screwed herself.
More left-wing stupidity and taxes are not what Labour needs to do next
Starmer is getting on a bit at 63, especially if he was to be PM after the next election.
Having some potential replacements in the wings isn’t a bad thing.
Bad move this, Starmer is not perfect but he runs the international side. This move just makes Labour look like the Torys.
Perhaps the least genuine person in the whole of British politics
Fuck off Burnham nobody wants a leadership challenge.
He definitely strikes me as someone who’s only in politics for his own ego. I wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him
It doesn’t seem right that someone can be handed a by-election seat and then become MP without us having a chance to vote.
I know we don’t elect PMs but normally the person is at least an MP when the parliament is elected
Burnham seems like a decent bloke who is fairly popular in the North West, but I suspect he won’t be as popular outside of his base as some people think.
He has a lot of luxury beliefs that might have worked in 2015, but not now. The world has changed a lot.
Unwise in my opinion, I think people are still looking at things as if it’s the conservatives in power and switching leaders every year is something that should be done.
He’s doing a very good job in Manchester now, outside of a complete crisis I can’t see any reason why Keir would be removed as leader, so Andy could easily of waited until Labour lose an election and then come in as leader.
I also can’t see what boost might be achieved from him over Keir in the eyes of the general public.
Put him in a good cabinet position and as a unified party.
Don’t go all Torymon backstabbing
He’s an absolute chancer. Abandoned Parliament when he wasn’t going to get reelected and now thinks he has the talent to come back and wrestle the premiership from the man who actually won the election.
This is why people detest politicians.
He should have to resign as mayor if he wants to run
These fucking name the last 10 prime minister questions in pub quizzes and gcse history just keep getting easier
I know Starmer is not perfect but hasn’t anyone learned the lessons of the conservative shitshow of past? We used to elect a leader and that leader would at least carry out a term ffs.
Changing leaders now will lead to more uncertainty and policy changes. It probably plays right into the hands of the far right too.