I had to read the article to make sure your title was correct. Forty BILLION……. BILLION. What in the name of fucking Christ.
ODFoxtrotOscar on
That the cost would be eyewatering has been known for quite a while
Presumably some good hunter cats is the solution to the vermin
limeflavoured on
Left out of the headline is that the renovation is going to take *61 years* because the government refuse to move somewhere else for ~10 years to allow a (cheaper) renovation.
Material_Regret4827 on
i’m sure the tendering process will be completely above board
cheekybutterfly on
Yeah, it’s true, and I’ve heard it has a rodent problem, too.
Haunting_Cell_8876 on
_Parliament is overrun by rats and mice_
That’s just the MPs.
Lego_Kitsune on
“Overrun by rats”
Yea theyre called the Tories, not sure if you’ve heard of them
Suspicious_Brief_235 on
Can’t they just get a few cats from RSPCA or Cat Protection? It would defo be a good deed to give a few cats a home.
VamosFicar on
Parliament is over run with vermin. Tell us something we don’t know.
_Alea-Iacta-Est on
Just start the work for gods sake is not like it’s going to magically get cheaper, easier or quicker to do
Chill_Panda on
We know parliament is over run with rats, but I don’t see how it costs 40 billion to kick out all those politicians
Rude_Sheepherder_714 on
Well yes, both chambers are indeed overrun with vermin…
Scoobilatchi on
There are over 600 rats in the chamber alone, they can typically be found sitting there in plain site at prime minister’s questions
Wackylew on
Wouldn’t it be cheaper just to blow it up Guy Fawkes style?
brntuk on
Surely an online Parliament wouldnt cost that sum – you know, one that was transparent and cost effective, and dare I say it, world leading.
Spamgrenade on
Parliament will burn down before anyone makes a decision on this. Its another one that can’t be won one way or the other.
Complex_Specific1373 on
I’m sorry, 40 fucking billion?
The fucking channel tunnel only cost 9 billion in todays money.
The The Gorges Dam was cheaper
Appropriate_North806 on
Well, that describes all the MPs perfectly I think
Rufus_Ffolkes on
Let’s build a new building or parliament campus(basic housing and transport links) outside of London.
Turn the old building into a museum or something.
yourefunny on
I just read that the fricking international space station cost $150 billion. How is this going to cost £40 billion! Get fucked you money grabbing wankers!
bluejackmovedagain on
It’s entirely falling apart, and not at all fit for purpose. You just need to watch a debate and vote for a three line whip bill to see that the chamber is too small (it only seats 427 people) and that the lobby voting system is ridiculously inefficient.
The best option would be to build a modern parliament building from scratch, and then to renovate the HoP and turn it into a museum. Doing it that way also means that, if we wanted, the HoP could still be used for things like the Kings Speech to maintain its traditional pageantry.
LeonardoW9 on
I guess this is the commoner version of ‘the peasants are revolting’ – ‘I know’
anonnymouse2025 on
Build somewhere new and modern. Blocks of 2-3 bed flats for MPs and staff, no more second home payments. Canteen on-site with basic meal allowance, no alcohol.
Musername2827 on
Build an actual modern building somewhere else and have this as a tourist trap.
Impossible-Maybe6088 on
Parliament is overrun by rats… Yes, they are called MPs
TheL0wKing on
Why don’t we just build a new modern parliment somewhere else and leave the Palace of Westminster as a tourist attraction and world heritiage site? It would be substantially cheaper and open up options for shifting policitians away from London. Not to mention that trying to run a modern country out of a building older than London’s sewer system might not be too efficient.
Or do MPs really need the ego boost of working out of a 200 year old Palance with a river view?
Temporary_Channel434 on
I mean, shouldn’t this be something the public votes on?
Bullinach1nashop on
Just build a new house outside of London. Maybe up north. Save 38 billion.
mturner1993 on
Anyone that has been around the back ends (not what public see) know its “fine”, but its the depths where no one goes thats the issue.
MPs have offices across the road – which is where they spend most of their time.
CaterpillarLoud8071 on
Time to move them all to Manchester or Birmingham, ay? I’d favour Manchester, because political impetus to get HS2 and NPR completed in full would then be personal for MPs and civil servants. They could fund it by selling all the old government offices in Westminster. The houses of Westminster could become a political museum after the much cheaper revamp – tourists would pay a lot to climb big Ben and see mock debates in the house of commons chamber.
JBWalker1 on
Just a table I made in another comment about recent massive Central London skyscrapers costing £300m-£1bn to build(not including land, etc). These are all built in the last few years or starting to be built now so they’re modern day costs. One of them will be the tied tallest building in the UK+EU too. So we could spend £1bn building Parliament workers an ultra modern tower fully custom built for modern day parliament for just £1bn.
Then you could have 1,000 people paid a good £100k/year working full time on just restoring Parliament for 20 YEARS non stop and that’ll only be another £2bn.
So we’re now at a cost of just £3bn AND we’d have a modern publicly owned London skyscraper.
So wheres the other £13bn-£37bn going? Sure there has to be lots of building materials for the restoration but we know one of the tallest UK skyscrapers can be built for £500m and that’s not all gonna be material costs but lets assume it is and add a full £500m/skyscrapers worth of building material costs to the Parliament restoration and we’re now at £3.5bn lol. Add another 500 full time workers so we now have 1,500 getting in the way of each other in Parliament and we’re at £4.5bn.
It’s all just silly. For £40bn we could build 25 new London Shard equivalents which I think is still UK+EUs second tallest building. Like these are real building cost numbers in Central London, not stuff im pulling out of thin air. For something with a lot more guess work we could build a full underground 3 lines Tube work under/across Birmingham(could then build like 100k homes along the lines).
Just seems irresponsible and inconsiderate that the £40bn option is even being considered. I can’t even work out how to get the absolute minimum estimated costs for the cheapest option! Is there an actual break down of the estimated costs??
gixxer-kid on
Should let the public decide if we want our tax money wasted on a £40B refurb.
Sir_Henry_Deadman on
At this point build a new one with accommodation around it so they can’t claim second homes for attending parliament and turn this into a museum or something
According_Box_9286 on
It’s definitely full of cockroaches that’s for sure.
wolfie-thompson on
Parliament has always been overrun by rats. This isn’t news.
IndividualCurious322 on
>”Parliament is overrun by rats and mice”
Yeah they’re paid £94,000 a year to be there.
Sudden_Fact_733 on
Close it down, make it a museum, move the government to a modern purpose built location. Clinging on to the past like this destroys any chance of fulfilling our actual potential
Politicub on
Don’t forget the need for people to constantly walk around the building to check if things are on fire cos the wiring is so fucking old.
Running-With-Cakes on
Overrun by rats and mice… that’s the best description of MPs
martzgregpaul on
For all the people saying knock it down…its an absolute masterpiece of Victorian Gothic. Even if we make it a museum that will cost billions to repair and maintain too.
So we are stuck with it. St Stephens Hall, Westminster Hall and The Elizabeth Tower in particular. Maybe we could keep the Pugin areas and modernise all the backrooms?
Spudsmad on
What the HoP overrun with vermin ? Not defining which politicians are included !!
Mad_Mark90 on
Judging by the last 20 years of governance I thought they were just trying to get the building torched so they could claim the insurance
42 Comments
I had to read the article to make sure your title was correct. Forty BILLION……. BILLION. What in the name of fucking Christ.
That the cost would be eyewatering has been known for quite a while
Presumably some good hunter cats is the solution to the vermin
Left out of the headline is that the renovation is going to take *61 years* because the government refuse to move somewhere else for ~10 years to allow a (cheaper) renovation.
i’m sure the tendering process will be completely above board
Yeah, it’s true, and I’ve heard it has a rodent problem, too.
_Parliament is overrun by rats and mice_
That’s just the MPs.
“Overrun by rats”
Yea theyre called the Tories, not sure if you’ve heard of them
Can’t they just get a few cats from RSPCA or Cat Protection? It would defo be a good deed to give a few cats a home.
Parliament is over run with vermin. Tell us something we don’t know.
Just start the work for gods sake is not like it’s going to magically get cheaper, easier or quicker to do
We know parliament is over run with rats, but I don’t see how it costs 40 billion to kick out all those politicians
Well yes, both chambers are indeed overrun with vermin…
There are over 600 rats in the chamber alone, they can typically be found sitting there in plain site at prime minister’s questions
Wouldn’t it be cheaper just to blow it up Guy Fawkes style?
Surely an online Parliament wouldnt cost that sum – you know, one that was transparent and cost effective, and dare I say it, world leading.
Parliament will burn down before anyone makes a decision on this. Its another one that can’t be won one way or the other.
I’m sorry, 40 fucking billion?
The fucking channel tunnel only cost 9 billion in todays money.
The The Gorges Dam was cheaper
Well, that describes all the MPs perfectly I think
Let’s build a new building or parliament campus(basic housing and transport links) outside of London.
Turn the old building into a museum or something.
I just read that the fricking international space station cost $150 billion. How is this going to cost £40 billion! Get fucked you money grabbing wankers!
It’s entirely falling apart, and not at all fit for purpose. You just need to watch a debate and vote for a three line whip bill to see that the chamber is too small (it only seats 427 people) and that the lobby voting system is ridiculously inefficient.
The best option would be to build a modern parliament building from scratch, and then to renovate the HoP and turn it into a museum. Doing it that way also means that, if we wanted, the HoP could still be used for things like the Kings Speech to maintain its traditional pageantry.
I guess this is the commoner version of ‘the peasants are revolting’ – ‘I know’
Build somewhere new and modern. Blocks of 2-3 bed flats for MPs and staff, no more second home payments. Canteen on-site with basic meal allowance, no alcohol.
Build an actual modern building somewhere else and have this as a tourist trap.
Parliament is overrun by rats… Yes, they are called MPs
Why don’t we just build a new modern parliment somewhere else and leave the Palace of Westminster as a tourist attraction and world heritiage site? It would be substantially cheaper and open up options for shifting policitians away from London. Not to mention that trying to run a modern country out of a building older than London’s sewer system might not be too efficient.
Or do MPs really need the ego boost of working out of a 200 year old Palance with a river view?
I mean, shouldn’t this be something the public votes on?
Just build a new house outside of London. Maybe up north. Save 38 billion.
Anyone that has been around the back ends (not what public see) know its “fine”, but its the depths where no one goes thats the issue.
MPs have offices across the road – which is where they spend most of their time.
Time to move them all to Manchester or Birmingham, ay? I’d favour Manchester, because political impetus to get HS2 and NPR completed in full would then be personal for MPs and civil servants. They could fund it by selling all the old government offices in Westminster. The houses of Westminster could become a political museum after the much cheaper revamp – tourists would pay a lot to climb big Ben and see mock debates in the house of commons chamber.
Just a table I made in another comment about recent massive Central London skyscrapers costing £300m-£1bn to build(not including land, etc). These are all built in the last few years or starting to be built now so they’re modern day costs. One of them will be the tied tallest building in the UK+EU too. So we could spend £1bn building Parliament workers an ultra modern tower fully custom built for modern day parliament for just £1bn.
|**Building**|**Status / Completion**|**Height**|**Total Sq Footage**|**Est. Build Cost**|
:–|:–|:–|:–|:–|
|**1 Undershaft**|*Approved (2029/30)*|309.6m|~1,660,000 sq ft|£1.0B+ (Projected)|
|**22 Bishopsgate**|Completed (2021)|278m|~1,275,000 sq ft|£600 Million|
|**One Nine Elms**|Completed (2024)|199m|~1,200,000 sq ft*|£1.0 Billion|
|**8 Bishopsgate**|Completed (2023)|204m|~913,000 sq ft|£300 Million|
|**40 Leadenhall**|Completed (2024)|155m|~900,000 sq ft|£875 Million|
Then you could have 1,000 people paid a good £100k/year working full time on just restoring Parliament for 20 YEARS non stop and that’ll only be another £2bn.
So we’re now at a cost of just £3bn AND we’d have a modern publicly owned London skyscraper.
So wheres the other £13bn-£37bn going? Sure there has to be lots of building materials for the restoration but we know one of the tallest UK skyscrapers can be built for £500m and that’s not all gonna be material costs but lets assume it is and add a full £500m/skyscrapers worth of building material costs to the Parliament restoration and we’re now at £3.5bn lol. Add another 500 full time workers so we now have 1,500 getting in the way of each other in Parliament and we’re at £4.5bn.
It’s all just silly. For £40bn we could build 25 new London Shard equivalents which I think is still UK+EUs second tallest building. Like these are real building cost numbers in Central London, not stuff im pulling out of thin air. For something with a lot more guess work we could build a full underground 3 lines Tube work under/across Birmingham(could then build like 100k homes along the lines).
Just seems irresponsible and inconsiderate that the £40bn option is even being considered. I can’t even work out how to get the absolute minimum estimated costs for the cheapest option! Is there an actual break down of the estimated costs??
Should let the public decide if we want our tax money wasted on a £40B refurb.
At this point build a new one with accommodation around it so they can’t claim second homes for attending parliament and turn this into a museum or something
It’s definitely full of cockroaches that’s for sure.
Parliament has always been overrun by rats. This isn’t news.
>”Parliament is overrun by rats and mice”
Yeah they’re paid £94,000 a year to be there.
Close it down, make it a museum, move the government to a modern purpose built location. Clinging on to the past like this destroys any chance of fulfilling our actual potential
Don’t forget the need for people to constantly walk around the building to check if things are on fire cos the wiring is so fucking old.
Overrun by rats and mice… that’s the best description of MPs
For all the people saying knock it down…its an absolute masterpiece of Victorian Gothic. Even if we make it a museum that will cost billions to repair and maintain too.
So we are stuck with it. St Stephens Hall, Westminster Hall and The Elizabeth Tower in particular. Maybe we could keep the Pugin areas and modernise all the backrooms?
What the HoP overrun with vermin ? Not defining which politicians are included !!
Judging by the last 20 years of governance I thought they were just trying to get the building torched so they could claim the insurance