• Marsh, K. & Bugusu, B. Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues. J. Food Sci. 72, R39–R55 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Choudalakis, G. & Gotsis, A. Permeability of polymer/clay nanocomposites: a review. Eur. Polym. J. 45, 967–984 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tyagi, P., Salem, K. S., Hubbe, M. A. & Pal, L. Advances in barrier coatings and film technologies for achieving sustainable packaging of food products–a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 115, 461–485 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, Y. & Li, Y. Determination of water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) of HDPE bottles for pharmaceutical products. Int. J. Pharmaceutics 358, 137–143 (2008).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jouppila, K. & Roos, Y. Water sorption and time-dependent phenomena of milk powders. J. Dairy Sci. 77, 1798–1808 (1994).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Geijer, T. Plastic packaging in the food sector. Six ways to tackle the plastic puzzle. ING THINK Economic and Financial Analysis, (ING Group, Amsterdam, 2019) Available at: https://think.ing.com/reports/plastic-packaging-in-the-food-sector-sixways-to-tackle-the-plastic-puzzle/.

  • Defruyt, S. Towards a new plastics economy. Field actions Science reports. The journal of field actions, 78-81 (2019).

  • European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) 2025/40 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2024 on packaging and packaging waste, amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and Directive (EU) 2019/904, and repealing Directive 94/62/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L, 2025/40 (2025).

  • Ncube, L. K., Ude, A. U., Ogunmuyiwa, E. N., Zulkifli, R. & Beas, I. N. Environmental impact of food packaging materials: a review of contemporary development from conventional plastics to polylactic acid based materials. Materials 13, 4994 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sangroniz, A. et al. Packaging materials with desired mechanical and barrier properties and full chemical recyclability. Nat. Commun. 10, 3559 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Lentschat, M., Buche, P., Dibie-Barthelemy, J., Menut, L. & Roche, M. Food packaging permeability and composition dataset dedicated to text-mining. Data Brief. 36, 107135 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Guillard, V. et al. The next generation of sustainable food packaging to preserve our environment in a circular economy context. Front. Nutr. 5, 121 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schaarsberg, N. G. & van de Stadt, K. Toward sustainable packaging practices in the soap and detergents industry: a sector-specific tool. In Proc. IAPRI World Packaging Conference 2024. International Association of Packaging Research Institutes (IAPRI, 2024).

  • Rankin, J., Wolff, I., Davis, H. & Rist, C. Permeability of amylose film to moisture vapor, selected organic vapors, and the common gases. Ind. Eng. Chem. Chem. Eng. Data Ser. 3, 120–123 (1958).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Stocchetti, G. Technology that bridges the gap. Packag. Films 3, 16–18 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Makino, Y. & Hirata, T. Modified atmosphere packaging of fresh produce with a biodegradable laminate of chitosan-cellulose and polycaprolactone. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 10, 247–254 (1997).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Strantz, A. & Zottola, E. Bacterial survival on lean beef and Bologna wrapped with cornstarch-containing polyethylene film. J. Food Prot. 55, 782–786 (1992).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ester, M., Kriegel, H. P., Sander, J. & Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In kdd 226-231 (1996).

  • Pezer, D. Application of cluster analysis for polymer classification according to mechanical properties. Technium 3, 67–75 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Stadlthanner, D., Steinkellner, H., Landschützer, C. & Kaever, D. A hierarchical density-based clustering method applied to mixed-mail in Austria. Logist. Res. 17, 1–17 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wessling, M. et al. Modelling the permeability of polymers: a neural network approach. J. Membr. Sci. 86, 193–198 (1994).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Phan, B. K. et al. Gas permeability, diffusivity, and solubility in polymers: simulation-experiment data fusion and multi-task machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 186 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wu, F., Misra, M. & Mohanty, A. K. Challenges and new opportunities on barrier performance of biodegradable polymers for sustainable packaging. Prog. Polym. Sci. 117, 101395 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bae, H. J. et al. Effect of clay content, homogenization RPM, pH, and ultrasonication on mechanical and barrier properties of fish gelatin/montmorillonite nanocomposite films. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 42, 1179–1186 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sharma, S. et al. Active film packaging based on bio-nanocomposite TiO2 and cinnamon essential oil for enhanced preservation of cheese quality. Food Chem. 405, 134798 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Peter, A. et al. Chemical and organoleptic changes of curd cheese stored in new and reused active packaging systems made of Ag-graphene-TiO2-PLA. Food Chem. 363, 130341 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ligaj, M., Tichoniuk, M., Cierpiszewski, R. & Foltynowicz, Z. Efficiency of novel antimicrobial coating based on iron nanoparticles for dairy products’ packaging. Coatings 10, 156 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • European Commission. (2009).

  • Park, H. M. et al. Preparation and properties of biodegradable thermoplastic starch/clay hybrids. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 287, 553–558 (2002).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Picard, E., Espuche, E. & Fulchiron, R. Effect of an organo-modified montmorillonite on PLA crystallization and gas barrier properties. Appl. Clay Sci. 53, 58–65 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fortunati, E., Peltzer, M., Armentano, I., Jiménez, A. & Kenny, J. M. Combined effects of cellulose nanocrystals and silver nanoparticles on the barrier and migration properties of PLA nano-biocomposites. J. Food Eng. 118, 117–124 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rhim, J.-W., Hong, S.-I. & Ha, C.-S. Tensile, water vapor barrier and antimicrobial properties of PLA/nanoclay composite films. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 42, 612–617 (2009).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Peelman, N. et al. Application of bioplastics for food packaging. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 32, 128–141 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rhim, J.-W., Lee, J. H. & Ng, P. K. Mechanical and barrier properties of biodegradable soy protein isolate-based films coated with polylactic acid. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 40, 232–238 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zong, Y. et al. Fabrication of antimicrobial and high-toughness poly (lactic acid) composite films using tung oil derivatives. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 254, 127792 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Brandão, R. M. et al. Active packaging of poly (lactic acid) nanofibers and essential oils with antifungal action on table grapes. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 369, fnac116 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bascón-Villegas, I. et al. A new eco-friendly packaging system incorporating lignocellulose nanofibres from agri-food residues applied to fresh-cut lettuce. J. Clean. Prod. 372, 133597 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Xing, Q., Xu, J. & Li, L. Quality and microbial diversity of homemade bread packaged in cinnamaldehyde loaded poly (lactic acid)/konjac glucomannan/wheat gluten bilayer film during storage. Food Chem. 402, 134259 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nivre, J. Dependency parsing. Lang. Linguist. Compass 4, 138–152 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mehta, V., Bawa, S. & Singh, J. Analytical review of clustering techniques and proximity measures. Artif. Intell. Rev. 53, 5995–6023 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Nanjundan, S., Sankaran, S., Arjun, C. & Anand, G. P. Identifying the number of clusters for K-Means: a hypersphere density based approach. arXiv preprint https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1912.00643 (2019).

  • Ikotun, A. M., Ezugwu, A. E., Abualigah, L., Abuhaija, B. & Heming, J. K-means clustering algorithms: a comprehensive review, variants analysis, and advances in the era of big data. Inf. Sci. 622, 178–210 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Quiñones-Grueiro, M., Prieto-Moreno, A., Verde, C. & Llanes-Santiago, O. Data-driven monitoring of multimode continuous processes: a review. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 189, 56–71 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Xuan, G., Zhang, W. & Chai, P. Filter pruning via expectation-maximization. In Proc. International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No. 01CH37205). 145–148 (IEEE, 2001).

  • Cui, M. Introduction to the k-means clustering algorithm based on the elbow method. Account. Audit. Financ. 1, 5–8 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Shahapure, K. R. & Nicholas, C. Cluster Quality Analysis Using Silhouette Score. In Proc. IEEE 7th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). 747–748 (IEEE, 2020).

  • Vila, J. P. & Schniter, P. Expectation-maximization Gaussian-mixture approximate message passing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 61, 4658–4672 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Giri, K., Biswas, T. K. & Sarkar, P. ECR-DBSCAN: an improved DBSCAN based on computational geometry. Mach. Learn. Appl. 6, 100148 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rousseeuw, P. J. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Davies, D. L. & Bouldin, D. W. A cluster separation measure. In Proc. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 224–227 (IEEE, 2009).

  • Share.

    Comments are closed.