• Calvin, K. et al. IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. Tech. Rep., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/ (2023).

  • Sepulveda, N. A., Jenkins, J. D., De Sisternes, F. J. & Lester, R. K. The role of firm low-carbon electricity resources in deep decarbonization of power generation. Joule 2, 2403–2420 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • IRENA. Renewable capacity statistics 2025. Tech. Rep. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2025/Mar/IRENA_DAT_RE_Capacity_Statistics_2025.pdf (2025).

  • IEA. Net Zero Roadmap: A Global Pathway to Keep the 1.5 °C Goal in Reach. Tech. Rep., International Energy Agency, Paris. www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-roadmap-a-global-pathway-to-keep-the-15-0c-goal-in-reach (2023).

  • Way, R., Ives, M. C., Mealy, P. & Farmer, J. D. Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition. Joule 6, 2057–2082 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jacobson, M. Z. et al. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 Countries of the World. Joule 1, 108–121 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, T. et al. Response to ‘Burden of proof: a comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems’. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 92, 834–847 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Child, M., Kemfert, C., Bogdanov, D. & Breyer, C. Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe. Renew. Energy 139, 80–101 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pickering, B., Lombardi, F. & Pfenninger, S. Diversity of options to eliminate fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system. Joule 6, 1253–1276 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wang, Y. et al. Accelerating the energy transition towards photovoltaic and wind in China. Nature 619, 761–767 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Denholm, P. & Hand, M. Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity. Energy Policy 39, 1817–1830 (2011).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rasmussen, M. G., Andresen, G. B. & Greiner, M. Storage and balancing synergies in a fully or highly renewable pan-European power system. Energy Policy 51, 642–651 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schlachtberger, D., Brown, T., Schramm, S. & Greiner, M. The benefits of cooperation in a highly renewable European electricity network. Energy 134, 469–481 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Roth, A. & Schill, W.-P. Geographical balancing of wind power decreases storage needs in a 100% renewable European power sector. iScience 26, 107074 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • He, G., Mallapragada, D. S., Bose, A., Heuberger-Austin, C. F. & Gençer, E. Sector coupling via hydrogen to lower the cost of energy system decarbonization. Energy. Environ. Sci. 14, 4635–4646 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hunter, C. A. et al. Techno-economic analysis of long-duration energy storage and flexible power generation technologies to support high-variable renewable energy grids. Joule 5, 2077–2101 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Tong, D. et al. Geophysical constraints on the reliability of solar and wind power worldwide. Nat. Commun. 12, 6146 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Raynaud, D., Hingray, B., François, B. & Creutin, J. Energy droughts from variable renewable energy sources in European climates. Renew. Energy 125, 578–589 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kittel, M. & Schill, W.-P. Measuring the Dunkelflaute: how (not) to analyze variable renewable energy shortage. Environ. Res. Energy 1, 035007 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dowling, J. A. et al. Role of long-duration energy storage in variable renewable electricity systems. Joule 4, 1907–1928 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sepulveda, N. A., Jenkins, J. D., Edington, A., Mallapragada, D. S. & Lester, R. K. The design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonized power systems. Nat. Energy 6, 506–516 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Cannon, D., Brayshaw, D., Methven, J., Coker, P. & Lenaghan, D. Using reanalysis data to quantify extreme wind power generation statistics: a 33 year case study in Great Britain. Renew. Energy 75, 767–778 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Potisomporn, P. & Vogel, C. R. Spatial and temporal variability characteristics of offshore wind energy in the United Kingdom. Wind Energy 25, 537–552 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Potisomporn, P., Adcock, T. A. & Vogel, C. R. Evaluating ERA5 reanalysis predictions of low wind speed events around the UK. Energy Rep. 10, 4781–4790 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Abdelaziz, S., Sparrow, S. N., Hua, W. & Wallom, D. C. Assessing long-term future climate change impacts on extreme low wind events for offshore wind turbines in the UK exclusive economic zone. Appl. Energy 354, 122218 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Leahy, P. G. & McKeogh, E. J. Persistence of low wind speed conditions and implications for wind power variability: persistence of low wind speeds. Wind Energy 16, 575–586 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Patlakas, P., Galanis, G., Diamantis, D. & Kallos, G. Low wind speed events: persistence and frequency. Wind Energy 20, 1033–1047 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohlendorf, N. & Schill, W.-P. Frequency and duration of low-wind-power events in Germany. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 084045 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Antonini, E. G. A. et al. Identification of reliable locations for wind power generation through a global analysis of wind droughts. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 103 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kies, A. et al. Critical review of renewable generation datasets and their implications for European power system models. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 152, 111614 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kapica, J. et al. The potential impact of climate change on European renewable energy droughts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 189, 114011 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hu, J. et al. Implications of a Paris-proof scenario for future supply of weather-dependent variable renewable energy in Europe. Adv. Appl. Energy 10, 100134 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Breyer, C. et al. Reflecting the energy transition from a European perspective and in the global context-Relevance of solar photovoltaics benchmarking two ambitious scenarios. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 1369–1395. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.3659 (2022).

  • Van Der Most, L., Van Der Wiel, K., Benders, R. M. J., Gerbens-Leenes, P. W. & Bintanja, R. Temporally compounding energy droughts in European electricity systems with hydropower. Nat. Energy. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41560-024-01640-5 (2024).

  • van Duinen, B., van der Most, L., Baatsen, M. & van der Wiel, K. Meteorological drivers of co-occurring renewable energy droughts in europe. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 223, 115993 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Rinaldi, K. Z., Dowling, J. A., Ruggles, T. H., Caldeira, K. & Lewis, N. S. Wind and solar resource droughts in California highlight the benefits of long-term storage and integration with the western interconnect. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 6214–6226 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bracken, C. et al. Standardized benchmark of historical compound wind and solar energy droughts across the Continental United States. Renew. Energy 220, 119550 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bracken, C. et al. Seasonal compound renewable energy droughts in the united states. Environ. Res. Energy 2, 025005 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Li, M. et al. Renewable energy quality trilemma and coincident wind and solar droughts. Commun. Earth Environ. 5. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01850-5. (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024).

  • Lei, H. et al. Frequency, duration, severity of energy drought and its propagation in hydro-wind-photovoltaic complementary systems. Renew. Energy 230, 120845 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gangopadhyay, A., Seshadri, A., Sparks, N. & Toumi, R. The role of wind-solar hybrid plants in mitigating renewable energy-droughts. Renew. Energy 194, 926–937 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kaspar, F. et al. A climatological assessment of balancing effects and shortfall risks of photovoltaics and wind energy in Germany and Europe. Adv. Sci. Res. 16, 119–128 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mockert, F., Grams, C. M., Brown, T. & Neumann, F. Meteorological conditions during periods of low wind speed and insolation in Germany: the role of weather regimes. Meteorol. Appl. 30, e2141 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Mayer, M. J., Biró, B., Szücs, B. & Aszódi, A. Probabilistic modeling of future electricity systems with high renewable energy penetration using machine learning. Appl. Energy 336, 120801 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ohba, M., Kanno, Y. & Nohara, D. Climatology of dark doldrums in Japan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 155, 111927 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Richardson, D., Pitman, A. J. & Ridder, N. N. Climate influence on compound solar and wind droughts in Australia. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 6, 184 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Potisomporn, P., Adcock, T. A. & Vogel, C. R. Extreme value analysis of wind droughts in Great Britain. Renew. Energy 221, 119847 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Biewald, B., Cozian, B., Dubus, L., Zappa, W. & Stoop, L. P. Evaluation of ‘dunkelflaute’ event detection methods considering grid operators’ needs. Environ. Res. Energy 2, 025007 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilczak, J. M., Kirk-Davidoff, D. B., Bloomfield, H., Bracken, C. & Sharp, J. Wind and solar energy droughts: Potential impacts on energy system dynamics and research needs. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 17, 022301 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Stoop, L. P. et al. The climatological renewable energy deviation index (CREDI). Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 034021 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Otero, N., Martius, O., Allen, S., Bloomfield, H. & Schaefli, B. A copula-based assessment of renewable energy droughts across Europe. Renew. Energy 201, 667–677 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Allen, S. & Otero, N. Standardised indices to monitor energy droughts. Renew. Energy 217, 119206 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • De Felice, M. ENTSO-E Pan-European Climatic Database (PECD 2021.3) in Parquet format. https://zenodo.org/record/5780184 (2022).

  • Kittel, M. & Schill, W.-P. High resolution, interactive, or animated versions of illustrations used in the paper “Quantifying the Dunkelflaute: An analysis of variable renewable energy droughts in Europe”. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13843390 (2025).

  • Ueckerdt, F., Brecha, R. & Luderer, G. Analyzing major challenges of wind and solar variability in power systems. Renew. Energy 81, 1–10 (2015).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Apt, J. The spectrum of power from wind turbines. J. Power Sour. 169, 369–374 (2007).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Heide, D. et al. Seasonal optimal mix of wind and solar power in a future, highly renewable Europe. Renew. Energy 35, 2483–2489 (2010).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Jurasz, J., Canales, F., Kies, A., Guezgouz, M. & Beluco, A. A review on the complementarity of renewable energy sources: concept, metrics, application and future research directions. Solar Energy 195, 703–724 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Harrison-Atlas, D., Murphy, C., Schleifer, A. & Grue, N. Temporal complementarity and value of wind-PV hybrid systems across the United States. Renew. Energy 201, 111–123 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schaber, K., Steinke, F., Mühlich, P. & Hamacher, T. Parametric study of variable renewable energy integration in Europe: Advantages and costs of transmission grid extensions. Energy Policy 42, 498–508 (2012).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fürsch, M. et al. The role of grid extensions in a cost-efficient transformation of the European electricity system until 2050. Appl. Energy 104, 642–652 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruhnau, O. & Qvist, S. Storage requirements in a 100% renewable electricity system: extreme events and inter-annual variability. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 044018 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pfenninger, S. & Staffell, I. Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data. Energy 114, 1251–1265 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Staffell, I. & Pfenninger, S. Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output. Energy 114, 1224–1239 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Pfenninger, S. Dealing with multiple decades of hourly wind and PV time series in energy models: a comparison of methods to reduce time resolution and the planning implications of inter-annual variability. Appl. Energy 197, 1–13 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zeyringer, M., Price, J., Fais, B., Li, P.-H. & Sharp, E. Designing low-carbon power systems for Great Britain in 2050 that are robust to the spatiotemporal and inter-annual variability of weather. Nat. Energy 3, 395–403 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Collins, S., Deane, P., Ó Gallachóir, B., Pfenninger, S. & Staffell, I. Impacts of inter-annual wind and solar variations on the European power system. Joule 2, 2076–2090 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schlott, M., Kies, A., Brown, T., Schramm, S. & Greiner, M. The impact of climate change on a cost-optimal highly renewable European electricity network. Appl. Energy 230, 1645–1659 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hill, J., Kern, J., Rupp, D. E., Voisin, N. & Characklis, G. The Effects of climate change on interregional electricity market dynamics on the U.S. West Coast. Earth’s Future 9, e2021EF002400 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Grochowicz, A., Van Greevenbroek, K., Benth, F. E. & Zeyringer, M. Intersecting near-optimal spaces: European power systems with more resilience to weather variability. Energy Econ. 118, 106496 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gunn, A., Dargaville, R., Jakob, C. & McGregor, S. Spatial optimality and temporal variability in Australia’s wind resource. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 114048 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ruggles, T. H. et al. Planning reliable wind- and solar-based electricity systems. Adv. Appl. Energy 15, 100185 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • ENTSO-e. TYNDP 2022 Scenario Building Guidelines. Tech. Rep., European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity. https://2022.entsos-tyndp-scenarios.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/TYNDP_2022_Scenario_Building_Guidelines_Version_April_2022.pdf (2022).

  • ENTSO-e & ENTSO-g. TYNDP 2024 Scenarios Report. Tech. Rep., European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity. https://tyndp.entsoe.eu/resources/tyndp2024-scenarios-report (2024).

  • European Commission. Directorate General for Energy., European Commission. Directorate General for Climate Action. & European Commission. Directorate General for Mobility and Transport. EU reference scenario 2020: energy, transport and GHG emissions: trends to 2050. (Publications Office, LU, 2021). https://doi.org/10.2833/35750.

  • BDI. Klimapfade 2.0 – Ein Wirtschaftsprogramm für Klima und Zukunft. Tech. Rep., Bundesverband der deutschen Industrie. https://bdi.eu/publikation/news/klimapfade-2-0-ein-wirtschaftsprogramm-fuer-klima-und-zukunft (2021).

  • Fraunhofer ISI & Consentec. Langfristszenarien. Tech. Rep. https://langfristszenarien.de/enertile-explorer-de/ (2024).

  • Prognos, Öko-Institut & Wuppertal-Institut. Klimaneutrales Deutschland 2045. Wie Deutschland seine Klimaziele schon vor 2050 erreichen kann. Langfassung im Auftrag von Stiftung Klimaneutralität, Agora Energiewende und Agora Verkehrswende. Tech. Rep. https://www.agora-verkehrswende.de/veroeffentlichungen/klimaneutrales-deutschland-2045-langfassung (2021).

  • Luderer, G., Kost, C. & Sörgel, D. Deutschland auf dem Weg zur Klimaneutralität 2045 – Szenarien und Pfade im Modellvergleich 359. https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_26056. Artwork Size: 359 pages Publisher: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. (2021).

  • Grochowicz, A., Van Greevenbroek, K. & Bloomfield, H. C. Using power system modelling outputs to identify weather-induced extreme events in highly renewable systems. Environ. Res. Lett.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad374a (2024).

  • Nahmmacher, P., Schmid, E., Hirth, L. & Knopf, B. Carpe diem: a novel approach to select representative days for long-term power system modeling. Energy 112, 430–442 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kittel, M., Hobbie, H. & Dierstein, C. Temporal aggregation of time series to identify typical hourly electricity system states: a systematic assessment of relevant cluster algorithms. Energy 247, 123458 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Teichgraeber, H. & Brandt, A. R. Time-series aggregation for the optimization of energy systems: goals, challenges, approaches, and opportunities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 157, 111984 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Göke, L. & Kendziorski, M. Adequacy of time-series reduction for renewable energy systems. Energy 238, 121701 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Sánchez-Pérez, P., Staadecker, M., Szinai, J., Kurtz, S. & Hidalgo-Gonzalez, P. Effect of modeled time horizon on quantifying the need for long-duration storage. Appl. Energy 317, 119022 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gong, C. C. et al. Bidirectional coupling of the long-term integrated assessment model REgional Model of INvestments and Development (REMIND) v3.0.0 with the hourly power sector model Dispatch and Investment Evaluation Tool with Endogenous Renewables (DIETER) v1.0.2. Geosci. Model Dev. 16, 4977–5033 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schreyer, F. et al. Distinct roles of direct and indirect electrification in pathways to a renewables-dominated European energy system. One Earth 7, 226–241 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Morin, B., Maimó Far, A., Flynn, D. & Sweeney, C. Reducing RES droughts through the integration of wind and solar PV. Renew. Energy 252, 123392 (2025).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Craig, M. T. et al. Overcoming the disconnect between energy system and climate modeling. Joule 6, 1405–1417 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Dolores-Tesillos, E., Otero, N. & Allen, S. Projections of standardised energy indices in future climate scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 014026 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zerrahn, A. & Schill, W.-P. Long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables: review and a new model. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79, 1518–1534 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaete-Morales, C., Kittel, M., Roth, A. & Schill, W.-P. DIETERpy: a Python framework for the Dispatch and investment evaluation tool with endogenous renewables. SoftwareX 15, 100784 (2021).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Zerrahn, A., Schill, W.-P. & Kemfert, C. On the economics of electrical storage for variable renewable energy sources. Eur. Econ. Rev. 108, 259–279 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schill, W.-P. & Zerrahn, A. Long-run power storage requirements for high shares of renewables: results and sensitivities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 83, 156–171 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schill, W.-P. Electricity storage and the renewable energy transition. Joule 4, 2059–2064 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Schill, W.-P. & Zerrahn, A. Flexible electricity use for heating in markets with renewable energy. Appl. Energy 266, 114571 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kittel, M. & Schill, W.-P. Renewable energy targets and unintended storage cycling: implications for energy modeling. iScience 25, 104002 (2022).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Kirchem, D. & Schill, W.-P. Power sector effects of green hydrogen production in Germany. Energy Policy 182, 113738 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gaete-Morales, C., Jöhrens, J., Heining, F. & Schill, W.-P. Power sector effects of alternative options for de-fossilizing heavy-duty vehicles-Go electric, and charge smartly. Cell Rep. Sustain. 1, 100123 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Roth, A., Gaete-Morales, C., Kirchem, D. & Schill, W.-P. Power sector benefits of flexible heat pumps in 2030 scenarios. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 718 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Caglayan, D. G. et al. Technical potential of salt caverns for hydrogen storage in Europe. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45, 6793–6805 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Talukdar, M., Blum, P., Heinemann, N. & Miocic, J. Techno-economic analysis of underground hydrogen storage in Europe. iScience 27, 108771 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Bundesamt für Justiz. Gesetz für den Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz – EEG 2023). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/eeg_2014/BJNR106610014.html (2024).

  • Share.

    Comments are closed.