Anthropic’s Chief on A.I.: ‘We Don’t Know if the Models Are Conscious’
Dario Amodei shares his utopian — and dystopian — predictions in the near term for artificial intelligence.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/opinion/artificial-intelligence-anthropic-amodei.html

5 Comments

  1. From the article 

    Are the lords of artificial intelligence on the side of the human race? That’s the core question I had for this week’s guest. Dario Amodei is the chief executive of Anthropic, one of the fastest growing AI companies. He’s something of a utopian when it comes to the potential benefits of the technology that he’s unleashing on the world. But he also sees grave dangers ahead and inevitable disruption

  2. Sometimes ai articles *seem* like they might be ads, and sometimes it’s just glaringly obvious.

    According to this interview anthropic’s AIs will one day:

    cure cancer

    Fix the economy

    Fix global democracy

  3. victim_of_technology on

    It seems like a lot of these companies want to or need to make money so instead of curing your depression so you go out and live your best life they infect you with a mental illness that leads you to continue to interact with the platform in a way that is optimized for the company’s financial gain.

  4. TravelAdditional9429 on

    We are obsessed with scaling ‘iron’—hoarding DDR5 and Gigawatts—expecting consciousness to simply ’emerge’ from brute force. But we’re ignoring a fundamental reality of scale: A single gram of sourdough starter possesses more computational complexity and parallel processing states than our most advanced data centers.
    ​While a data center manages exabytes of static bits, that gram of dough orchestrates billions of autonomous biological ‘processors’ (cells), each running a 12-million-base-pair OS (DNA) with real-time, fuzzy-logic responses to the environment.
    ​Maybe Amodei can’t find a ‘consciousness-meter’ because he’s looking for it in the desert of binary logic. The real ‘Singularity’ won’t be a massive explosion of server power, but a quiet shift toward the elegant, non-numerical resonance of a ‘matchbox’ logic. We don’t need a bigger Golem; we need a better word on its forehead.”