Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan has proposed that a country with friendly relations to both Yerevan and Moscow could "purchase the concession management rights" of Armenia’s railways, currently held by a subsidiary of Russian Railways (RZD). He named Kazakhstan, UAE, and Qatar as potential candidates, citing concerns that Russian management is causing international routes to bypass Armenia, making it lose a competitive advantage.

This proposal comes at a time when RZD itself is in deep financial trouble. The company’s debt ballooned to nearly $52 billion by the end of 2025. To stay afloat, the state-owned giant is preparing a massive asset sale.

With the parent company desperately selling off prime assets to cover its debts, the future of its Armenian subsidiary, South Caucasian Railway, is uncertain. Pashinyan’s push for a new operator could be a strategic move to secure the railway’s future before RZD’s financial collapse forces a more chaotic outcome.

https://oc-media.org/pashinyan-proposes-third-country-takeover-of-armenian-railways-from-russia/

Posted by ViktorArm

6 Comments

  1. Why not us? I mean, I see that there’s a unique opportunity to take it back from Russians after we gave it to them (burn in hell Qoch).

    But why not take it over ourselves? Do we not have the money for it?

  2. VariousClock6115 on

    I was initially skeptical of this, and my first reflexive reaction was “why not just nationalize it!?”

    But then I did some research with my favorite robot side-kick. As it turns out, this is actually probably the most strategically sound move (PM pushing for a 3rd party to step in that is Russia-neutral).

    TL;DR below:

    Armenia doesn’t need to “nationalize” the railways — they already own them. Russia only has a 30-year operating concession (signed 2008) through its subsidiary South Caucasus Railway. The key issue right now is that Russian management is actively hurting Armenia’s position in the TRIPP corridor negotiations. Some parties in the TRIPP framework are arguing the route should bypass Armenia entirely because the railway is Russian-operated and nobody wants to deal with that baggage.

    Pashinyan has been escalating pressure since December 2025. First he threatened to withdraw specific non-operational sections (Yeraskh–Nakhchivan, Gyumri–Kars, Ijevan–Gazakh) from the concession and restore them with state funds. Then just this week he proposed Russia sell the concession to a neutral third country — Kazakhstan, UAE, or Qatar — to remove the political problem without a direct confrontation.
    Russia’s incentive is to stall. TRIPP competes directly with the Russian/Iranian-backed North-South Transport Corridor, so restoring Armenian rail links that enable east-west transit undermines Moscow’s leverage. Analysts expect them to drag things out.

    The risks of a unilateral move: ~3,000 jobs tied to SCR, potential legal disputes over the concession terms, hundreds of millions in Russian investment to account for, and the fact that the whole system runs on Soviet-era equipment and Russian broad gauge. But Armenia already nationalized its power grid from a Russian-linked entity, so there’s precedent.

    TL;DR: Armenia holds the cards legally (they own the infrastructure), the political pressure is mounting fast thanks to TRIPP, and Pashinyan is being strategic — using withdrawal threats on dormant lines while proposing a face-saving concession transfer for the rest.

    ^^ Claude said this. I honestly hadn’t thought of it this way.

    Look at that. Our government is actually navigating a coherent, diplomatic strategy, rather than knee-jerk reactions or populist stupidity.

  3. So I just looked up the [original agreement](https://ppp.worldbank.org/library/concession-agreement-transfer-armenian-railway-system-south-caucasian-railway-closed-joint-stock-company-created-russian-railways-closed-open-joint-stock-company) we signed in 2007. It’s a 30-year concession where we retain ownership of the land, tracks, and infrastructure. The asset reverts to full Armenian control in 2038, so Pashinyan’s proposal is a highly possible solution. We own it, we’re just changing the manager.

  4. Sounds like it could be China. They have the money, expertise, and would deliver results quick. But so far Armenia has been cautious with major Chinese investments into the country.

    Also this is the reason Pashinyan has been raising the alarm lately, and trying to find a quick solution.

    >without naming who they are — seeking to bypass Armenia, by pointing out that Armenia’s railway system is under Russian management.