It’d be neat to see this with price per gram instead of price per piece.
hashtag_AD on
We need an F1 subcategory
dvorakenthusiast on
I’m surprised to see City so far up the y-axis.
zombiemutant on
Labels are too heavy, it is hard to see datapoints. It looks like Ninjago is cheaper than Minecraft at first glance, but if you look at the points carefully, you will notice that it goes the other way.
Also I do not understand the colors of the datapoints. Does it mean something or just a design feature to mimic the colorful nature of Lego? Yellow points on the white canvas are not very readable.
![Average price of Lego sets by theme [OC]](https://www.byteseu.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/xx03jlnqrakg1-1536x956.jpeg "Average price of Lego sets by theme [OC]")
7 Comments
The source is Brick Economy. Made with Photoshop and Google sheets
What about Lego Architecture? Or does that roll up into something here?
Edit: Disregard…I see the 15 sets threshold to be considered.
Naturally I had to look up [“icons”](https://www.lego.com/en-us/themes/lego-icons) (which by the way many of which are definitely licensed content)
>Designed for a challenging yet rewarding building experience, LEGO® Icons sets showcase impressive landmarks, modular buildings, classic vehicles, pop culture favorites and beautiful home décor sets. Find your passion and immerse yourself in builds that are worthy to be displayed
It’d be neat to see this with price per gram instead of price per piece.
We need an F1 subcategory
I’m surprised to see City so far up the y-axis.
Labels are too heavy, it is hard to see datapoints. It looks like Ninjago is cheaper than Minecraft at first glance, but if you look at the points carefully, you will notice that it goes the other way.
Also I do not understand the colors of the datapoints. Does it mean something or just a design feature to mimic the colorful nature of Lego? Yellow points on the white canvas are not very readable.