van Dijk, M., Morley, T., Rau, M. L. & Saghai, Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat. Food 2, 494–501 (2021).
Zhao, H. et al. China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment. Nat. Sustain. 4, 1042–1051 (2021).
Wang, J. et al. North-to-south transfer of grain and meat products significantly reduces PM2.5 pollution and associated health risk in China. Resour. Environ. Sustain. 17, 100168 (2024).
Liu, L. et al. Exploring global changes in agricultural ammonia emissions and their contribution to nitrogen deposition since 1980. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121998119 (2022).
Xu, R. et al. Global ammonia emissions from synthetic nitrogen fertilizer applications in agricultural systems: empirical and process-based estimates and uncertainty. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 314–326 (2019).
Liu, M. et al. Ammonia emission control in China would mitigate haze pollution and nitrogen deposition, but worsen acid rain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7760–7765 (2019).
Clark, M. et al. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120584119 (2022).
Bauer, S. E., Tsigaridis, K. & Miller, R. Significant atmospheric aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5394–5400 (2016).
Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).
Uwizeye, A. et al. Nitrogen emissions along global livestock supply chains. Nat. Food 1, 437–446 (2020).
Gatto, A. & Chepeliev, M. Reducing global food loss and waste could improve air quality and lower the risk of premature mortality. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 014080 (2024).
Malley, C. S. et al. Integrated assessment of global climate, air pollution, and dietary, malnutrition and obesity health impacts of food production and consumption between 2014 and 2018. Environ. Res. Commun. 3, 075001 (2021).
Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Van Dingenen, R. & Leip, A. Air pollutant emissions from global food systems are responsible for environmental impacts, crop losses and mortality. Nat. Food 3, 942–956 (2022).
Chaudhary, A., Gustafson, D. & Mathys, A. Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nat. Commun. 9, 848 (2018).
Kinnunen, P. et al. Local food crop production can fulfil demand for less than one-third of the population. Nat. Food 1, 229–237 (2020).
Li, M. et al. Global food-miles account for nearly 20% of total food-systems emissions. Nat. Food 3, 445–453 (2022).
Li, Y. et al. Changes in global food consumption increase GHG emissions despite efficiency gains along global supply chains. Nat. Food 4, 483–495 (2023).
Zheng, L. et al. Health burden from food systems is highly unequal across income groups. Nat. Food 5, 251–261 (2024).
Gatto, A. & Chepeliev, M. Global food loss and waste estimates show increasing nutritional and environmental pressures. Nat. Food 5, 136–147 (2024).
Nesme, T., Metson, G. S. & Bennett, E. M. Global phosphorus flows through agricultural trade. Glob. Environ. Change 50, 133–141 (2018).
Lun, F. et al. Influences of international agricultural trade on the global phosphorus cycle and its associated issues. Glob. Environ. Change 69, 102282 (2021).
Hong, C. et al. Land-use emissions embodied in international trade. Science 376, 597–603 (2022).
Foong, A., Pradhan, P., Fror, O. & Kropp, J. P. Adjusting agricultural emissions for trade matters for climate change mitigation. Nat. Commun. 13, 3024 (2022).
Dalin, C., Wada, Y., Kastner, T. & Puma, M. J. Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543, 700–704 (2017).
Bai, Z. et al. Agricultural trade impacts global phosphorus use and partial productivity. Nat. Food 4, 762–773 (2023).
Chaudhary, A. & Kastner, T. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Glob. Environ. Change 38, 195–204 (2016).
Green, J. M. H. et al. Linking global drivers of agricultural trade to on-the-ground impacts on biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23202–23208 (2019).
Chung, M. G. & Liu, J. International food trade benefits biodiversity and food security in low-income countries. Nat. Food 3, 349–355 (2022).
Pendrill, F. et al. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 1–10 (2019).
Springmann, M., Kennard, H., Dalin, C. & Freund, F. International food trade contributes to dietary risks and mortality at global, regional and national levels. Nat. Food 4, 886–893 (2023).
Chen, X. et al. Physical and virtual nutrient flows in global telecoupled agricultural trade networks. Nat. Commun. 14, 2391 (2023).
Oita, A. et al. Substantial nitrogen pollution embedded in international trade. Nat. Geosci. 9, 111–115 (2016).
Zhang, Y. et al. Quantifying regional consumption-based health impacts attributable to ambient air pollution in China. Environ. Int. 112, 100–106 (2018).
Wang, H. et al. Trade-driven relocation of air pollution and health impacts in China. Nat. Commun. 8, 738 (2017).
Zhang, Q. et al. Transboundary health impacts of transported global air pollution and international trade. Nature 543, 705–709 (2017).
Zhao, H. et al. Reduction of global life expectancy driven by trade-related transboundary air pollution. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 9, 212–218 (2022).
Nansai, K. et al. Consumption in the G20 nations causes particulate air pollution resulting in two million premature deaths annually. Nat. Commun. 12, 6286 (2021).
Domingo, N. G. G. et al. Air quality-related health damages of food. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2013637118 (2021).
Liu, X. et al. Dietary shifts can reduce premature deaths related to particulate matter pollution in China. Nat. Food 2, 997–1004 (2021).
Stylianou, K. S., Fulgoni, V. L. & Jolliet, O. Small targeted dietary changes can yield substantial gains for human health and the environment. Nat. Food 2, 616–627 (2021).
Clark, M. A., Springmann, M., Hill, J. & Tilman, D. Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23357–23362 (2019).
Zheng, L. et al. Indirect emissions contribute a quarter of air pollution-related health burden of food systems in China. Nat. Food 6, 766–776 (2025).
Aguiar, A., Chepeliev, M., Corong, E. & van der Mensbrugghe, D. The Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) data base: version 11. J. Glob. Econ. Anal. 7, 37 (2023).
Chepeliev, M. Developing an air pollutant emissions database for global economic analysis. J. Glob. Econ. Anal. 6, 55 (2021).
Balasubramanian, S. et al. The food we eat, the air we breathe: a review of the fine particulate matter-induced air quality health impacts of the global food system. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 103004 (2021).
Zhan, X. et al. Improved estimates of ammonia emissions from global croplands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 1329–1338 (2021).
Ma, R. et al. Mitigation potential of global ammonia emissions and related health impacts in the trade network. Nat. Commun. 12, 6308 (2021).
Yang, H., Huang, X., Westervelt, D. M., Horowitz, L. & Peng, W. Socio-demographic factors shaping the future global health burden from air pollution. Nat. Sustain. 6, 58–68 (2022).
Lelieveld, J. et al. Loss of life expectancy from air pollution compared to other risk factors: a worldwide perspective. Cardiovasc. Res. 116, 1910–1917 (2020).
Gu, B. et al. Abating ammonia is more cost-effective than nitrogen oxides for mitigating PM2.5 air pollution. Science 374, 758–762 (2021).
Bai, Z. et al. Relocate 10 billion livestock to reduce harmful nitrogen pollution exposure for 90% of China’s population. Nat. Food 3, 152–160 (2022).
Song, X. P. et al. Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 4, 784–792 (2021).
Gu, W. et al. The asymmetric impacts of international agricultural trade on water use scarcity, inequality and inequity. Nat. Water 2, 324–336 (2024).
Christina, P., Hubacek, K., Sun, L. & Feng, K. Global Trade, Pollution and Mortality 161–171 (Routledge/GSE Research, 2018).
Xu, X. et al. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat. Food 2, 724–732 (2021).
He, P., Feng, K., Baiocchi, G., Sun, L. & Hubacek, K. Shifts towards healthy diets in the US can reduce environmental impacts but would be unaffordable for poorer minorities. Nat. Food 2, 664–672 (2021).
Ambikapathi, R. et al. Global food systems transitions have enabled affordable diets but had less favourable outcomes for nutrition, environmental health, inclusion and equity. Nat. Food 3, 764–779 (2022).
Lucas, E., Guo, M. & Guillen-Gosalbez, G. Low-carbon diets can reduce global ecological and health costs. Nat. Food 4, 394–406 (2023).
Smith, V. H. & Glauber, J. W. Trade, policy, and food security. Agric. Econ. 51, 159–171 (2019).
Baldos, U. L. C. & Hertel, T. W. The role of international trade in managing food security risks from climate change. Food Secur. 7, 275–290 (2015).
Liu, W., Yang, H., Ciais, P., Kummu, M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. China’s Food supply sources under trade conflict with the United States and limited domestic land and water resources. Earths Future 8, e2020EF001482 (2020).
Yuan, R., Rodrigues, J. F. D., Wang, J. & Behrens, P. The short-term impact of US-China trade war on global GHG emissions from the perspective of supply chain reallocation. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 98, 106980 (2023).
Lin, J. et al. Carbon and health implications of trade restrictions. Nat. Commun. 10, 4947 (2019).
Fuchs, R. A., Brown, P., Cossar, C., Henry, F. & Rounsevell, R. C. M. US–China trade war imperils Amazon rainforest. Nature 567, 451–454 (2019).
Mottaleb, K. A., Kruseman, G. & Snapp, S. Potential impacts of Ukraine–Russia armed conflict on global wheat food security: a quantitative exploration. Glob. Food Secur. 35, 100659 (2022).
Abay, K. A. et al. The Russia–Ukraine war: implications for global and regional food security and potential policy responses. Glob. Food Secur. 36, 100675 (2023).
Chai, L. et al. Telecoupled impacts of the Russia–Ukraine war on global cropland expansion and biodiversity. Nat. Sustain. 7, 432–441 (2024).
Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. & Lennox, J. Constructing an environmentally-extended multi-regional input–output table using the GTAP database. Econ. Syst. Res. 23, 131–152 (2011).
Andrew, R. M. & Peters, G. P. A multi-region input–output table based on the Global Trade Analysis Project database (GTAP-MRIO). Econ. Syst. Res. 25, 99–121 (2013).
Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., Yantosca, R. M. & Chin, M. Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate–nitrate–ammonium aerosols in the United States: implications for policy. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004473 (2004).
Liao, H., Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Wu, S. & Mickley, L. J. Biogenic secondary organic aerosol over the United States: comparison of climatological simulations with observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007813 (2007).
Duncan Fairlie, T., Jacob, D. J. & Park, R. J. The impact of transpacific transport of mineral dust in the United States. Atmos. Environ. 41, 1251–1266 (2007).
van Donkelaar, A. et al. Monthly global estimates of fine particulate matter and their uncertainty. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 15287–15300 (2021).
Liang, X. et al. Air quality and health benefits from fleet electrification in China. Nat. Sustain. 2, 962–971 (2019).
Tang, R. et al. Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030. Nat. Commun. 13, 1008 (2022).
Sun, Y. et al. Global supply chains amplify economic costs of future extreme heat risk. Nature 627, 797–804 (2024).