I don’t love censorship, but I do think it’s crazy how mainstream incest porn has become.
FreeTheDimple on
Completely unenforceable. This is just virtue signalling.
BeardedBaldMan on
Good. Frankly it’s ruining pornography when it’s all weird step-incest stuff, especially when younger people are thinking it’s the norm and not a relatively recent thing. Can’t we just go back to tradesmen not doing the job they were hired for?
lasthopel on
More moral policing from the party who put a kiddies fiddlers best freind in top office, and they ask why the greens are gaining support every day
jarry1250 on
They also show unsafe working practices for plumbers and electricians, harassment in the workplace, breaches of the Hackney Carriages (Charging) Regulations 1988, etc etc
Or perhaps it’s as obviously fake as WWE. Who knows, certainly not me.
jennifersaurus on
This is such a confusing article. So it’s now legal to get married as step siblings but illegal to make porn together? Also it will make it harder for police to catch actual CSA material if you make adult baby stuff illegal but that’s happening anyway? Am I just having a reading comprehension issue
random_user_1968 on
If they aren’t blood relatives, then someone please explain (in simple terms 😂) how it’s classed as incest, assuming that they haven’t been adopted because I think then, it’s incest.
vaguelypurple on
So it’s just the title of the video then? Not the content? What’s stopping someone being arrested just because a video with “step-” in the title was found in their browser cache when the video content is between two unrelated people? Also the same videos get uploaded with different titles all of the time. One day it’s a stripper the next day it’s your sister.
PoggleRebecca on
I’m genuinely not interested in porn so maybe I’m out of the loop on this, but how adults spend their “free time” is entirely up to them as far as I’m concerned. So I feel like this government’s obsession with porn is getting a little weird? Can someone explain this to me like I’m simple, because I don’t get it at all.
Also LBC putting the caption picture of a young boy at a computer feels like a little “won’t someone *please* think of the children” emotional bribe to help people swallow this. I’m assuming that since underage kids are already blanket banned from any porn, a specific ban on a type of porn would just be targeting adults, so why have they put a stock photo of a child?
lasthopel on
>They also agreed by 142 votes to 140, majority two, to bring intimate pictures and videos of adults pretending to be children in line with similar images of real children
So to be clear this goverment says adults can now create CSAM by just being adults who act in a childish way, thats like saying furries who have sex in fur suits are committing beastiality
>The Conservative peer also warned pornography existed “with settings in children’s bedrooms, with actors in children’s clothes, braces, toys, pigtails and other markers of childhood”
Youre literally going to do more harm then good, youre going to water down people response to actual csam and make it harder to take down, when porn is on the public Web with creators posting it you can be sure everyone is adult, if those things get banned and people move to sketchy sites they are going to run into actual csam and not be able to google it because that is now a crime, it will also make people scared to report it
>braces, toys, pigtails and other markers of childhood
So what?, if i get railed on film i have to wear my hair in a bun and not wear anything deemed “childish”, no hello kitty tops?, no barbie?, are we going to ban porn filmed in a taxi because people might get horny when they see a black cab?,
stick1_ on
But it’s not illegal to have sex with a step relative so I don’t undestand this
CNash85 on
This government’s moralistic crusade against individual genres of pornography is embarrassing. The BBC is even trying to spin it as a “think of the children” thing – but there’s already plenty of legislation in place to prevent children from encountering pornography in general, so why hold up this one particular genre as something that’s so bad that adults must be blocked from seeing it?
xylophileuk on
Porn from now on will be strictly missionary and will be filmed from the other side of the blankets.
alii-b on
We gonna arrest people for watching films depicting murder too? Can we watch game of thrones anymore? Where’s the line gonna be drawn?
[deleted] on
[removed]
Antique_Historian_74 on
So where does the recent adaption of “Wuthering Heights” fit under this ban?
It’s clearly intended as erotica. Cathy and Heathcliff were raised together from childhood. So obviously needs to be banned, right?
Bloody circus of a government.
Morteca on
The biggest priority for the UK government guys.
Kier – just because you are going nofap doesn’t mean you push it on everyone else lul.
OvernightExpert on
Thank god we sorted all this country’s problems so we can finally get to these issues now. I just love it when the government censors what our grown adults do/watch/enjoy
TokyoBaguette on
Sociology studies should be written about that crap…
What happened to make it more common?
Lockdowns? Weird Japanese AV?
MarvZealous on
What are all these MP’s watching online that they seem to know all these category’s?
High-Tom-Titty on
I know our leaders are capable of dealing with multiple issues, but it’s funny they’re tackling this. What genre is next? Banning the pizza guy delivering to the lonely housewife because it’s junk food?
LookOverall on
What puzzles me is how does pornography depict incest? I mean how do you tell if lovers depicted are relatives?
dewittless on
Are we really at the stage where we don’t think adults can discern reality from fiction?
LordLucian on
Weewoo wank police are at your door again to justify the online Id laws
lasthopel on
Here is my example for people who want to explain it ot others
Imagen someone smokes weed, or drinks or likes coffee
They live in a place where weed or whatever is legal and they can go to the weed shop
Not everyone like the weed shop or weed at all, that is fine it is a safe legal option where you can know where stuff comes from and if there are issues you can go to the police or to the shop, everyone knows the weed shop and the weed shop has to follow the rules like the music shop or the video shop.
Then weed gets banned, so the shop closes, and now you still want weed but you have to find someone willing to sell it, you need to find someone willing to break the law to get what was a day ago legal
Most guys are ok, weed is weed at the end of the day
Then one day your weed guy gets taken down by the police or he quits because money
So you find a new weed guy, he seems a bit odd and speaks Russian but he still has weed, this weed seems odd, looks like weed but maybe it did not grow enough, you cant really tell and youre worried but weed is weed, and who cares anyway if this was bad weed this guy would have been taken down super fast right?
So you smoke this Russian guys weed and sure feels like weed but you also feel this odd feeling of being unsure if it waa just weed, but it is not like you can ask him, cant go to the police as weed is illegal you could face time for just having it and smoking it, so you just sit there at home thinking about what just happened.
fujoshimoder on
We live in a stupid, reactionary dystopia obsessed with the aesthetic of moral purity whilst the people in charge buddy up to pedophile sex traffickers and panopticon-obsessed demons wearing human skin.
oscarolim on
Can’t have incest depicted on porn. Must leave that for real life only.
EddieHeadshot on
Glad to see we are tackling the real issues not being some sort of morality police
HereticLaserHaggis on
Actual, genuine question.
Does this mean game of thrones is now banned? Since we see sone sister fucking
Univeralise on
Welcome to the UK where you can marry your cousin but stuff like this gets banned.
How’s about we address fundamental issues affecting kids due to small genetic pools rather than focusing on censorship?
FYI, I hate stuff like this, but I feel our focus should be on actual inbreeding rather than pretend shit. Next they’ll be banning game of thrones due to its depiction.
Pheasant_Plucker84 on
Although this isn’t something I am into, I don’t really see what The problem is? It’s not illegal?
Skeet_fighter on
I feel like this government isn’t going to be satisfied with the state of porn in this country until you personally have to get the OK from Kier himself every time you have a wank.
If a woman is showing too much ankle in a video, that’s it! Straight to prison!
To protect the children, obviously.
halos1518 on
Just ban porn for christ sake, we all know you want to.
giblets46 on
But they don’t want to ban actual sexual relationships between actual relatives (1st cousins)…..
Additional_Pickle_59 on
They love the unenforceable laws these days. Every person needs a police officer watching them at this rate.
The police officer also needs another police officer watching for them doing illegal stuff watching you doing illegal stuff
Nobody wants to participate in the conga line
Tartan_Samurai on
I love these stories. Commentators can be categorised in the following groups:
Furious Wankers
Incredulous Wankers
Despairing Wankers
Ponderous Wankers
Amused Wankers
beIIe-and-sebastian on
Labour try not to be authoritarian challenge: Impossible.
usedburgermeat on
It is rather ironic that this is considered inappropriate but it’s still legal to marry your first cousin. A ficticious situation involving people who aren’t actually related is somehow worse than a real situation with people who are
_redme on
Isn’t it like one of the top 5 watched and searched in some areas ?
40 Comments
What are you doing step bro?
2-3 years with good behaviour…
I don’t love censorship, but I do think it’s crazy how mainstream incest porn has become.
Completely unenforceable. This is just virtue signalling.
Good. Frankly it’s ruining pornography when it’s all weird step-incest stuff, especially when younger people are thinking it’s the norm and not a relatively recent thing. Can’t we just go back to tradesmen not doing the job they were hired for?
More moral policing from the party who put a kiddies fiddlers best freind in top office, and they ask why the greens are gaining support every day
They also show unsafe working practices for plumbers and electricians, harassment in the workplace, breaches of the Hackney Carriages (Charging) Regulations 1988, etc etc
Or perhaps it’s as obviously fake as WWE. Who knows, certainly not me.
This is such a confusing article. So it’s now legal to get married as step siblings but illegal to make porn together? Also it will make it harder for police to catch actual CSA material if you make adult baby stuff illegal but that’s happening anyway? Am I just having a reading comprehension issue
If they aren’t blood relatives, then someone please explain (in simple terms 😂) how it’s classed as incest, assuming that they haven’t been adopted because I think then, it’s incest.
So it’s just the title of the video then? Not the content? What’s stopping someone being arrested just because a video with “step-” in the title was found in their browser cache when the video content is between two unrelated people? Also the same videos get uploaded with different titles all of the time. One day it’s a stripper the next day it’s your sister.
I’m genuinely not interested in porn so maybe I’m out of the loop on this, but how adults spend their “free time” is entirely up to them as far as I’m concerned. So I feel like this government’s obsession with porn is getting a little weird? Can someone explain this to me like I’m simple, because I don’t get it at all.
Also LBC putting the caption picture of a young boy at a computer feels like a little “won’t someone *please* think of the children” emotional bribe to help people swallow this. I’m assuming that since underage kids are already blanket banned from any porn, a specific ban on a type of porn would just be targeting adults, so why have they put a stock photo of a child?
>They also agreed by 142 votes to 140, majority two, to bring intimate pictures and videos of adults pretending to be children in line with similar images of real children
So to be clear this goverment says adults can now create CSAM by just being adults who act in a childish way, thats like saying furries who have sex in fur suits are committing beastiality
>The Conservative peer also warned pornography existed “with settings in children’s bedrooms, with actors in children’s clothes, braces, toys, pigtails and other markers of childhood”
Youre literally going to do more harm then good, youre going to water down people response to actual csam and make it harder to take down, when porn is on the public Web with creators posting it you can be sure everyone is adult, if those things get banned and people move to sketchy sites they are going to run into actual csam and not be able to google it because that is now a crime, it will also make people scared to report it
>braces, toys, pigtails and other markers of childhood
So what?, if i get railed on film i have to wear my hair in a bun and not wear anything deemed “childish”, no hello kitty tops?, no barbie?, are we going to ban porn filmed in a taxi because people might get horny when they see a black cab?,
But it’s not illegal to have sex with a step relative so I don’t undestand this
This government’s moralistic crusade against individual genres of pornography is embarrassing. The BBC is even trying to spin it as a “think of the children” thing – but there’s already plenty of legislation in place to prevent children from encountering pornography in general, so why hold up this one particular genre as something that’s so bad that adults must be blocked from seeing it?
Porn from now on will be strictly missionary and will be filmed from the other side of the blankets.
We gonna arrest people for watching films depicting murder too? Can we watch game of thrones anymore? Where’s the line gonna be drawn?
[removed]
So where does the recent adaption of “Wuthering Heights” fit under this ban?
It’s clearly intended as erotica. Cathy and Heathcliff were raised together from childhood. So obviously needs to be banned, right?
Bloody circus of a government.
The biggest priority for the UK government guys.
Kier – just because you are going nofap doesn’t mean you push it on everyone else lul.
Thank god we sorted all this country’s problems so we can finally get to these issues now. I just love it when the government censors what our grown adults do/watch/enjoy
Sociology studies should be written about that crap…
What happened to make it more common?
Lockdowns? Weird Japanese AV?
What are all these MP’s watching online that they seem to know all these category’s?
I know our leaders are capable of dealing with multiple issues, but it’s funny they’re tackling this. What genre is next? Banning the pizza guy delivering to the lonely housewife because it’s junk food?
What puzzles me is how does pornography depict incest? I mean how do you tell if lovers depicted are relatives?
Are we really at the stage where we don’t think adults can discern reality from fiction?
Weewoo wank police are at your door again to justify the online Id laws
Here is my example for people who want to explain it ot others
Imagen someone smokes weed, or drinks or likes coffee
They live in a place where weed or whatever is legal and they can go to the weed shop
Not everyone like the weed shop or weed at all, that is fine it is a safe legal option where you can know where stuff comes from and if there are issues you can go to the police or to the shop, everyone knows the weed shop and the weed shop has to follow the rules like the music shop or the video shop.
Then weed gets banned, so the shop closes, and now you still want weed but you have to find someone willing to sell it, you need to find someone willing to break the law to get what was a day ago legal
Most guys are ok, weed is weed at the end of the day
Then one day your weed guy gets taken down by the police or he quits because money
So you find a new weed guy, he seems a bit odd and speaks Russian but he still has weed, this weed seems odd, looks like weed but maybe it did not grow enough, you cant really tell and youre worried but weed is weed, and who cares anyway if this was bad weed this guy would have been taken down super fast right?
So you smoke this Russian guys weed and sure feels like weed but you also feel this odd feeling of being unsure if it waa just weed, but it is not like you can ask him, cant go to the police as weed is illegal you could face time for just having it and smoking it, so you just sit there at home thinking about what just happened.
We live in a stupid, reactionary dystopia obsessed with the aesthetic of moral purity whilst the people in charge buddy up to pedophile sex traffickers and panopticon-obsessed demons wearing human skin.
Can’t have incest depicted on porn. Must leave that for real life only.
Glad to see we are tackling the real issues not being some sort of morality police
Actual, genuine question.
Does this mean game of thrones is now banned? Since we see sone sister fucking
Welcome to the UK where you can marry your cousin but stuff like this gets banned.
How’s about we address fundamental issues affecting kids due to small genetic pools rather than focusing on censorship?
FYI, I hate stuff like this, but I feel our focus should be on actual inbreeding rather than pretend shit. Next they’ll be banning game of thrones due to its depiction.
Although this isn’t something I am into, I don’t really see what The problem is? It’s not illegal?
I feel like this government isn’t going to be satisfied with the state of porn in this country until you personally have to get the OK from Kier himself every time you have a wank.
If a woman is showing too much ankle in a video, that’s it! Straight to prison!
To protect the children, obviously.
Just ban porn for christ sake, we all know you want to.
But they don’t want to ban actual sexual relationships between actual relatives (1st cousins)…..
They love the unenforceable laws these days. Every person needs a police officer watching them at this rate.
The police officer also needs another police officer watching for them doing illegal stuff watching you doing illegal stuff
Nobody wants to participate in the conga line
I love these stories. Commentators can be categorised in the following groups:
Furious Wankers
Incredulous Wankers
Despairing Wankers
Ponderous Wankers
Amused Wankers
Labour try not to be authoritarian challenge: Impossible.
It is rather ironic that this is considered inappropriate but it’s still legal to marry your first cousin. A ficticious situation involving people who aren’t actually related is somehow worse than a real situation with people who are
Isn’t it like one of the top 5 watched and searched in some areas ?