15 Comments

  1. bannedByTencent on

    Fuck ’em. This is in line with NATO doctrine. Pedonald can go suck a fat one for a change.

  2. I believe we should focus on developing weapons capable of destabilization of existing nuclear power stations. At least for now.

    Chernobyl farted once, and half of Europe was shitting bricks.

  3. Yeah, sure, and USA will “protect” in case of invasion how it was with Ukraine which exchange nuclear arsenal for USA “guarantee” of protection.

  4. I said that Israel will never permit Poland to do this weeks ago and was downvoted lol

    Poland subs right now:

    ![gif](giphy|LycfkVG4L6x0Y|downsized)

    Edit: And now Poland is getting denied and I am still getting downvoted for stating facts lol

  5. No serious analyst expected US blessing, not even the optimists. The ceiling of our ambitions here is Washington choosing to protend they do not to notice that we are working on it.

  6. “~~US~~ Russia would “strenuously oppose” Poland or other European state developing nuclear weapons, says ~~Pentagon~~ Kremlin official”

  7. AnynomousPotato on

    Having nukes = no incentive to buy weapons from US. They will never allow us to have nukes or we will buy less crap from them.

  8. I hope Poland develops the weapons it needs to defend itself and deter Russian hostilities and tells the US to go fuck off.

  9. Random_Reddit_Bro on

    So they want Europe to defend itself from Russia..but at the same time they are opposing the idea of Europe being stronger? WTF?!

  10. See, the trick is not to openly say “We want to have nukes” but working silently and simply saying “We have hundreds of nukes” one day; preferably while nuking a bunch of fibsh in the ocean to prove it. #TheIsraelWay

  11. Stormy_whiskey on

    It’s ok for the US to oppose and I am sure we ( in Europe ) will all hear what they say.