2 DOGE staffers say ‘no’ regrets for people losing income, didn’t reduce the deficit: Depositions

https://abcnews.com/Politics/2-doge-staffers-regrets-people-losing-income-reduce/story?id=131050170

24 Comments

  1. Twodogsonecouch on

    Increased the deficit is the words you are looking for. Why is the media so weak now.

  2. Because DOGE staffers knew exactly what they were there to do. To steal and shut down investigations into Musk. So why would they regret it?

  3. Romantic_Piscean on

    Ever wonder what a mid-level official from the Third Reich would look like in today’s America?! Here you go….

  4. SelfDestructSep2020 on

    Literal dunning krugger effect in these depositions.
    “Do you think someone with no background in research or the grants process should be evaluating research grants?”
    “No if you’re well-read and have alternative experience that’s sufficient”

  5. WitchitaMountains on

    We need to put these little dead-eyed scumbags in federal prison in a few years.

  6. Everywhereslugs on

    Their only qualifications to work at doge were that they are smarmy, self-entitled and arrogant little shits that probably couldn’t get real work elsewhere. May karma come back to bite them hard on the ass one day.

  7. These two ***boys*** are complete morons. They can’t even define what DEI is. They have no clue. Their defense of their actions are completely without any substance.

  8. Reducing the deficit was never the plan. It was the excuse for gaining access to all the records and files.

    Notice how suddenly they were just done? Yeah, they got the access they needed.

  9. crossdtherubicon on

    They appear to be mostly young, White men, of a similar level of education and experience. And some kind of Any Rand type of ideologues.

    They don’t have a high-level of life experience or professional/technical experience. Their perspectives and experiences are limited, and heavily filtered through ideology.

    They may not have had to work through many difficulties or rely on other people or programs for anything. They may have come from higher income and higher educated communities and families.

    They have narrow view of people and of the world. They are perfect henchmen but, not yet capable of deep and balanced thought, of a Human-Level fundamental respect of others, etc. Not excusing their behavior but just saying water is wet.

    Not the sort of people who should be in those positions, unless of course, that exactly the kind of person you want in those positions.

  10. These kids don’t have the capacity to understand what they did, let alone have any regrets about it. They don’t have enough life experience to even form an opinion about what they have done. It won’t be until life kicks them in the nuts, that they will begin to understand how bad they screwed up.

  11. Alexwonder999 on

    What blows my mind is that they admit they didnt reduce the debt or deficit one thin dime and they’re still smug. Its like if I said I was going to hit a home run, stepped onto the plate and managed to break my own face and hit myself in the nuts with my own bat and then later came back to brag about what a good baseball player I was.

  12. Their names are Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh. Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh were part of DOGE who ripped apart the American civil service, cost people jobs, degraded America’s ability to serve its citizens, and saved no money. Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh are reckless privileged twerps, and under congressional testimony, they also revealed themselves to be unrepentant sociopaths.

    Their names are Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh. Let this be the lead sentence in every article ever written about them. Let it follow them around on their resumes like an inescapable stink. Let all decent Americans know that any company that hires Justin Fox and Nate Cavanaugh has demonstrated its lack of morals — its absolute unfitness to do business with any decent person.

    Do not let them fade peacefully into civilian life.

  13. TakeYourClarkBars on

    One of these dudes who was in charge of choosing which “DEI” programs to cut spent about 25 minutes avoiding to define the term “DEI”. It was excruciating to listen to.

    Here’s his a sample of the conversation:

    Interviewer: Since you were tasked with applying the EO referring to DEI to make cuts, do you feel you have an understanding of what the term “DEI” means?

    Doge dude: Yes

    Intv: ok, what is your understanding of the term “DEI”

    Doge due: I’d have to refer to the EO

    Intv: So you don’t have an understanding of what DEI is?

    DD: I would need to refer to the EO.

    Intv: well, that is to say you don’t have an understanding, as of today, January 2026?

    DD: again, I would need to refer to the EO

    Intv: So in order to state your understanding of a term listed in the EO, document you would refer to for every cut, you would need the document? So again let me ask, what is YOUR understanding of DEI, not the EO.

    DD:I would need to read the EO, it’s very broad.

    This shit goes on for legit 25 minutes…

    Will post/edit the link for the vid once I find which one it was

    Edit: Ope! They took the videos down

  14. The entire depositions were uploaded to YouTube by the organizations that had sued them, and then the government complained that the videos were causing “reputational damage and death threats.” Then the judge agreed and ordered them to be taken down. These entitled kiddies will never face real accountability in their lives.