Chen, S., Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Teng, F. & McLellan, B. C. A critical review on deployment planning and risk analysis of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) toward carbon neutrality. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 167, 112537 (2022).
Wang, F. et al. Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. Innovation 2, 100180 (2021).
Kuang, H., Akmal, Z. & Li, F. Measuring the effects of green technology innovations and renewable energy investment for reducing carbon emissions in China. Renew. Energy 197, 1–10 (2022).
Bandara, P., Ray, R., Lu, J. & Gallagher, K. P. Developing countries locked out of low-carbon technology trade. Science 388, 248–250 (2025).
Pigato, M. et al. Technology Transfer and Innovation for Low-Carbon Development (World Bank Publications, 2020).
Global Energy Review 2025 (IEA, 2025); https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025
Jiang, J., Yin, D., Sun, Z., Ye, B. & Zhou, N. Global trend of methane abatement inventions and widening mismatch with methane emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 14, 393–401 (2024).
CO2 Emissions of All World Countries JRC/IEA/PBL 2022 report (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2022).
Probst, B., Touboul, S., Glachant, M. & Dechezleprêtre, A. Global trends in the invention and diffusion of climate change mitigation technologies. Nat. Energy 6, 1077–1086 (2021).
Meng, B. et al. Developing countries’ responsibilities for CO2 emissions in value chains are larger and growing faster than those of developed countries. One Earth 6, 167–181 (2023).
Energy Technology Perspectives 2024—Analysis (IEA, 2024); https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2024
Avenyo, E. K. & Tregenna, F. Greening manufacturing: technology intensity and carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries. Appl. Energy 324, 119726 (2022).
Sachs, J. D. et al. Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 805–814 (2019).
Bozeman, B. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Res. Policy 29, 627–655 (2000).
Keller, W. in Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (eds Hall, B. H. & Rosenberg, N.) 793–829 (Elsevier, 2010).
Ayerst, S., Ibrahim, F., MacKenzie, G. & Rachapalli, S. Trade and diffusion of embodied technology: an empirical analysis. J. Monet. Econ. 137, 128–145 (2023).
Zhong, H. et al. Global spillover effects of the European green deal and plausible mitigation options. Nat. Sustain. 7, 1501–1511 (2024).
Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E. & Rutherford, T. F. Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 22–29 (2022).
Wang, X.-T. et al. Trade-linked shipping CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 945–951 (2021).
Foong, A., Pradhan, P., Frör, O. & Kropp, J. P. Adjusting agricultural emissions for trade matters for climate change mitigation. Nat. Commun. 13, 3024 (2022).
Qu, S., Li, Y., Liang, S., Yuan, J. & Xu, M. Virtual CO2 emission flows in the global electricity trade network. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 6666–6675 (2018).
Tian, K. et al. Regional trade agreement burdens global carbon emissions mitigation. Nat. Commun. 13, 408 (2022).
Jinji, N., Zhang, X. & Haruna, S. Do deeper regional trade agreements enhance international technology spillovers?. World Econ. 42, 2326–2363 (2019).
Martínez-Zarzoso, I. & Chelala, S. Trade agreements and international technology transfer. Rev. World Econ. 157, 631–665 (2021).
Brandi, C., Schwab, J., Berger, A. & Morin, J.-F. Do environmental provisions in trade agreements make exports from developing countries greener?. World Dev. 129, 104899 (2020).
Santacreu, A. M. Dynamic gains from trade agreements with intellectual property provisions. J. Polit. Econ. 133, 1133–1168 (2025).
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R. & Taylor, M. S. Is free trade good for the environment?. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 877–908 (2001).
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Q. 35, 128–152 (1990).
Bozeman, B., Rimes, H. & Youtie, J. The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Res. Policy 44, 34–49 (2015).
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L. & Hemous, D. The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 131–166 (2012).
Greening Regional Trade Agreements on Non-Tariff Measures Through Technical Barriers to Trade and Regulatory Co-Operation (OECD, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1787/dfc41618-en
Bui, L., Dewitte, R., Happersberger, S., Nagabhatla, N. & Rayp, G. Environmental Impact Assessments of Trade Agreements (United Nations Univ., 2024); https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32941.09440
Bronckers, M. & Gruni, G. Retooling the sustainability standards in EU free trade agreements. J. Int. Econ. Law 24, 25–51 (2021).
Antimiani, A., Costantini, V. & Paglialunga, E. Fossil fuels subsidy removal and the EU carbon neutrality policy. Energy Econ. 119, 106524 (2023).
Yuan, W., Lu, W. & Zhang, J. The impact of depth of environmental provisions and CO2 emissions embodied in international trade. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 108301–108318 (2023).
Aldieri, L., Sena, V. & Vinci, C. P. Domestic R&D spillovers and absorptive capacity: some evidence for US, Europe and Japan. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 198, 38–49 (2018).
Danquah, M., Ouattara, B. & Quartey, P. Technology transfer and national efficiency: does absorptive capacity matter?. Afr. Dev. Rev. 30, 162–174 (2018).
Bloom, N., Draca, M. & Van Reenen, J. Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Rev. Econ. Stud. 83, 87–117 (2016).
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Hanson, G. H., Pisano, G. & Shu, P. Foreign competition and domestic innovation: evidence from US patents. Am. Econ. Rev. Insights 2, 357–374 (2020).
Bodansky, D. The legal character of the Paris Agreement. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 25, 142–150 (2016).
Fu, X., Pietrobelli, C. & Soete, L. The role of foreign technology and indigenous innovation in the emerging economies: technological change and catching-up. World Dev. 39, 1204–1212 (2011).
Branstetter, L. G., Fisman, R. & Foley, C. F. Do stronger intellectual property rights increase international technology transfer? Empirical evidence from U. S. firm-level panel data. Q. J. Econ. 121, 321–358 (2006).
Smith, R. D., Correa, C. & Oh, C. Trade, TRIPS, and pharmaceuticals. Lancet 373, 684–691 (2009).
Raiser, K., Naims, H. & Bruhn, T. Corporatization of the climate? Innovation, intellectual property rights, and patents for climate change mitigation. Energy Res. Social Sci. 27, 1–8 (2017).
Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., Haščič, I., Johnstone, N. & Ménière, Y. Invention and transfer of climate change–mitigation technologies: a global analysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 5, 109–130 (2011).
Kirchberger, M. A. & Pohl, L. Technology commercialization: a literature review of success factors and antecedents across different contexts. J. Technol. Transf. 41, 1077–1112 (2016).
Runfola, D. et al. geoBoundaries: a global database of political administrative boundaries. PLoS ONE 15, e0231866 (2020).
Wang, J. et al. Source data of main results for “International trade reduces emissions through technology transfer led by key emitters”. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.31295878 (2026).
Imai, K., Keele, L. & Tingley, D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol. Methods 15, 309–334 (2010).
Wang, J. International trade reduces emissions through technology transfer led by key emitters. CodeOcean https://doi.org/10.24433/CO.1738407.V1 (2026).