UK sees no evidence of Iran targeting Britain, says Starmer

https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-sees-no-evidence-iran-targeting-britain-says-starmer-2026-03-23/

Posted by 1-randomonium

24 Comments

  1. 1-randomonium on

    >”We carry ​out assessments all the ​time in order to keep ⁠us safe, and there’s ​no assessment that we’re being ​targeted in that way,” Starmer told reporters.

    >He was asked if Britain could ​be targeted by Iran ​after reports at the weekend that ‌Iran ⁠had fired two ballistic missiles at the U.S.-U.K. military base Diego Garcia in the ​Indian Ocean.

    Steve Reed had said it earlier but it’s good to see No 10’s maintaining a consistent message on this.

  2. KhaosByDesignUK on

    Good, that’s the last thing we need & would be very illogical for Iran considering they have 2 other countries actually attacking them.

  3. Hopefully, we manage to stay out of the war and the oil prices can come down soon.

    The Iranian regime is awful but that’s a problem for the Iranian people to solve, we’ve seen how playing World Police turns out.

  4. Purpleaeroplane on

    I’m not a fan of starmer but fair play staying out of what Blair dragged us into in 2003.
    The world can see Isreal and USA are the real monsters

  5. deathtofatalists on

    so, who fired the rockets at DG and droned cyprus then keir, and for what purpose?

    go on, spit it out. don’t be shy.

  6. jakethepeg1989 on

    Did he not say a couple of weeks ago that Britain has foiled 20 attacks from Iran?

    And there was suggestion the ambulance arson had something to do with them. So it seems quite specific that Iran isn’t firing missiles at us, but that isn’t to say they aren’t a threat to us in other ways.

  7. Head_Crab_Enjoyer on

    This whole Middle Eastern situation just isn’t our fight. We have to deal with the consequences of it, sure, but we shouldn’t make it worse. The regime is eliminated for now. Iran has incredibly defensive terrain. Leave Trump to roll around in the filth alone, it’s what he’s best at.

  8. So the drones that targeted Cyprus wasn’t from Iran? Seems rather far for shaheds to fly don’t you think?

  9. Initial-Sherbert1889 on

    I normally hate conspiracies but it’s kind of weird how every time the US wants something and Britain says the conditions don’t warrant it, something happens to make those conditions happen within a few days.

    If Iran is using these missiles to intimidate Europe, why deny firing them after?

    If they want to keep them a secret weapon…why fire them at all?

  10. It’s a good thing out PM doesn’t operate and react through social media posts isn’t it. We’d already have started WW3 if some of the experts here were to be believed

  11. Apart from when they fired missles at our British Cyprus base & Diego Garcia….and the threat of sleeper cells and lone wolves carrying out attacks, like the attempt of 2 Iranians last week to get onto a Naval base in Scotland and the arson attack on the Jewish ran Ambulances few days ago!

  12. That’s because Iran aren’t targeting Britain.

    They’re occupied with Israel and the US right now .

    Most likely an attack by Iran would target UK-US bases within striking distance. Iran already lashed out striking multiple surrounding countries in retaliation for US-Israeli strikes and no real sign of any intention or attempt to strike Britain has been seen(based on real evidence and not outlandish claims).

    I don’t even think Britain should be working with or having involvement with the US or Israel in the Middle East at all but being allies/trade partners requires some give and take.

    There’s no benefit to Iran in striking Britain directly and it’s only Israel’s blind claim trying to have anyone believe otherwise

  13. Apprehensive-Golf-95 on

    iran would be insane to give allies to the US at the minute. While the two dictatorial regimes fight it out we need to stay well clear.

  14. New-Doctor9300 on

    This isnt our war. If Starmer had any more sense he’d kick the US forces out of Fairford. We might not be involved aggressively but by allowing the United States use of our bases, we are complicit at the very least.

    Its good to see him pushing back in this way though. But it just feels at odds with my prior point.

    Like, “We are not involved, but we will allow the US to use our bases to strike Iran”, so you *are* involved?

  15. Not that I want us to be getting involved here but Iran’s proxy targeted Akrotiri and more missiles were fired at Chaos. That’s targeting Britain

  16. Although he’s shit, Starmer continues to prove that he’s at least better than the tories and reform

  17. ImpressiveRest2423 on

    What about the Iranian couple that were detained near a military site a few days ago?