Damn I hate these low-effort AI slop videos. How many times can you use that “it’s not x, but Y” phrase pattern, hnnngggghhh
Agantas on
Yes, it was on the news. It was not the first ship saboutaging the undersea infrastructure by dragging the anchor. There was also Newnew Polar Bear, Yi Peng 3 and Eagle S. Of these ships, Eagle S was also seized and was held longer than Fitburg, which got to leave after two weeks or so. One of the crew members was arrested.
4 Comments
Yea, naturally, it was all over the news when it happened.
Yes, this was widely discussed at the time, not going to bother checking the video, wikipedia page is somewhat decent [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Elisa_data_cable_incident](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Elisa_data_cable_incident) here is the latest police publication on the matter I believe, [https://poliisi.fi/en/-/fitburg-vessel-to-move-to-international-waters-under-border-guard-s-control](https://poliisi.fi/en/-/fitburg-vessel-to-move-to-international-waters-under-border-guard-s-control) trial has not yet been held I think.
Damn I hate these low-effort AI slop videos. How many times can you use that “it’s not x, but Y” phrase pattern, hnnngggghhh
Yes, it was on the news. It was not the first ship saboutaging the undersea infrastructure by dragging the anchor. There was also Newnew Polar Bear, Yi Peng 3 and Eagle S. Of these ships, Eagle S was also seized and was held longer than Fitburg, which got to leave after two weeks or so. One of the crew members was arrested.