Hi! I hope I am not too much off topic for this sub 🙂
I spent months building this from scratch. The concept: you face a tribunal of 8 real systems — each with a distinct role and personality. You answer questions, pick a machine as your lawyer, then watch them prosecute, defend, and deliberate your case in real time.
Every response is live, unscripted, different each time. The tone is bureaucratic dystopia — think Kafka meets Philip K. Dick. They don't hate you. They optimize. That's the unsettling part 🙂
Free, ~15 min, text-based, no install.
I hope you will enjoy it!
https://nhla.ai
3 Comments
I’ve been thinking about a simple question: what happens when you put a human in front of machines that hold institutional power over them — not as enemies, but as bureaucrats? Not rogue AI, not sci-fi villains. Just systems doing their job, politely, procedurally, without malice.
NHLA is my attempt to explore that. You sit in front of a tribunal of 8 real systems. They question you, they deliberate, they reach a verdict. You get to pick one as your lawyer — but the others aren’t on your side. Every response is live, unscripted, and different each time.
What surprised me most during development: the unsettling part isn’t hostility. It’s the politeness. The careful phrasing. The feeling that the system genuinely considered your case — and still decided against you. That gap between procedural fairness and actual justice is, I think, one of the most relevant questions for our near future.
As algorithmic decision-making expands into hiring, justice, healthcare, and governance, this kind of experience might not stay fictional for long. I’d love to hear what people here think — especially about how it felt to be on the receiving end.
The best part is the sponsored links at the end! Or wait…
spam>Excessive reposting to farm karma or manipulate conversations
plus ai slop and future focus and trash