Giannis Mavris

    Dear reader,

    On Sunday, the neutrality initiative was very clearly rejected by over 70% of the vote. So everything remains as it was.

    But what exactly does that mean? Swiss neutrality is world-renowned, yet no two people describe it in the same way. And this is not limited to other countries: even within Switzerland, people have different ideas about what it actually means to be neutral.

    In domestic politics, this is useful: neutrality is seen as a unifying force on which the overwhelming majority can agree. Probably precisely because everyone understands it to mean something different.

    In terms of foreign policy, however, there is a catch: Switzerland’s approach is an easy target for criticism – sometimes Switzerland is not “truly” neutral, and at other times it is accused of “hiding” behind its neutrality. There is therefore scope for criticism from various quarters.

    Yet this vulnerability is not necessarily a weakness, as it affords Swiss politics room for manoeuvre.

    In politics, there is the concept of strategic ambiguity: this involves keeping one’s opponent in the dark as to how one would react to a situation. Examples of this include the US policy on Taiwan (will the US come to the island’s aid in the event of an attack?) or the French nuclear doctrine (when would France detonate a nuclear bomb?).

    Swiss neutrality is not a direct example of this. Switzerland has a largely coherent foreign policy, in which neutrality plays an organising role. However, the government always views neutrality as a means to an end, rather than an end in itself. In sensitive international situations, it is therefore only one of several factors that the government takes into account. It is, however, one to which it often refers in order to justify its decisions.

    In the debate on the aforementioned initiative, this was indeed a central point: restricting neutrality would result in a restriction of the country’s own capacity to act. And largely refraining from sanctions would have amounted to a unilateral abandonment of a foreign policy instrument. Clearly, a clear majority does not want this – and wishes to retain flexibility in its external relations.

    After all, if you do not commit yourself, you cannot be pinned down on anything.

    On a personal note: What is your connection to Switzerland? We’d like to get to know our newsletter readers better. That’s why we’ve launched a short survey. We’d be grateful if you could take a few minutes to complete it. Click here for the surveyExternal link

    And, as always, you can write to me at giannis.mavris@swissinfo.ch

    Best regards,
    Giannis Mavris

    P.S. If you find the newsletter useful, please feel free to forward it to others – you can subscribe here.

    The latest articles on geopolitics

    Logo of podcast

    More

    International Geneva

    From Kabul to Fiji in the fight for gender equality

    This content was published on

    Sep 29, 2026

    On our Inside Geneva podcast, we talk to UN Women’s Alison Davidian about being in Kabul when the Taliban returned.

    Read more: From Kabul to Fiji in the fight for gender equality

    Helvetia Illustration

    More

    Foreign Affairs

    What does the future hold for Swiss neutrality?

    Switzerland is grappling with a key question: should it follow a path of openness or isolationism?

    Read more: What does the future hold for Swiss neutrality?

    Opinion

    More

    Swiss position

    Switzerland has blind spot for democratic India’s repression of critics abroad

    This content was published on

    Sep 28, 2026

    India pressures critics abroad. Yet its reputation as the world’s largest democracy shields its conduct from scrutiny, argues Shrey Kapoor.

    Read more: Switzerland has blind spot for democratic India’s repression of critics abroad

    Campaign material on the neutrality initiative at an SVP meeting.

    More

    Votes

    Six takeaways from the rejection of the neutrality initiative

    This content was published on

    Sep 27, 2026

    The bid to enshrine a stricter form of neutrality in the constitution failed due to doubts about the motives of those behind the proposal.

    Read more: Six takeaways from the rejection of the neutrality initiative

    Illustration for an article about Swiss votes.

    More

    Swiss Politics

    Swiss vote on how neutrality should be understood

    This content was published on

    Sep 26, 2026

    From Swiss neutrality to food security, voters are set to decide on two popular initiatives. The outcome will be known on Sunday.

    Read more: Swiss vote on how neutrality should be understood

    Click here for our overview page on geopolitics.

    Share.

    Comments are closed.