Share.

    21 Comments

    1. WeightDimensions on

      Article Text –

      A “greedy” tax office worker who defrauded the taxpayer of more than £300,000 in child benefit only has to pay back £1, a court has ruled.

      Tracy Ashbridge falsely claimed three of her children were disabled and also submitted false tax credits claims for another 15 children. She used details from her work computer system of members of the public to facilitate some of the frauds.

      She was jailed for six counts of fraud while her husband, Robert Ashbridge, who helped her in one of the offences, was given a suspended prison sentence. Now her case has been back before Newcastle Crown Court under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

      The court heard she benefited to the tune of £305,952 but, as she has no available assets, she must pay back just £1 – unless she comes into money in the future.

      Prosecutor Neil Jones told the hearing: “She has no available amount to satisfy the order. There is absolutely, definitely, no available sum.”

      Ashbridge had worked for HM Revenue & Customs from 2012 and had access to child tax credit claims as her role was to process them. The court heard she was paid just over £11,000 a year.

      The mother-of-four began offending in 2015 when she made claims for child tax credits for her three youngest children. She thought other claimants suspected of offences were not being investigated and the “temptation became too much”, the court heard.

      She made false claims that her children were disabled, which resulted in more than £180,000 being fraudulently obtained.

      At one point Ashbridge messaged her husband saying: “Shall we have another child” and he replied saying “Are you taking the ****, how we meant to do that.” She replied: “Not physically lol” and he said “Do you mean money?”. She then asked if he could think of a child to use and he suggested a name and date of birth and Tracey replied with a texted kiss.

      Ashbridge had access through her work system to legitimate claims made by members of the public and used that to her advantage. One family had written to HMRC saying they were moving to Poland and she claimed money for herself for their two children, a total of £59,000.

    2. I mean they appear to live in a house.

      If it’s not rented then that should be sold and the money reclaimed from there.

    3. “He speaks of him being a trustworthy member of the congregation of his local church and he is trusted in the running and administration of the parish”

      Thou shalt not steal. They probably want to have a look at the books at that church too.

      You would think claiming for 15 children would produce some kind of automated alert that this claimant should be checked up on.

    4. masterblaster0 on

      How do you benefit from £306,000 and have no available assets to show for it?

      It’s £40,000 a year on top of their wages.

    5. Headline’s a bit misleading if you read the text she’s paying £1 but if she ever comes into money in the future she’s got to pay the government back. She’s also been sent to prison, not just fined.

      I suppose it’s only to be expected that the second Labour take over the right wing press begin with the “ohh benefit scroungers” complaining again, as though the Tories haven’t been in government for 14 years until like 2 weeks ago.

    6. Equivalent_Pay_8931 on

      A white couple committing benefit fraud? But i thought it was all the immigrants doing this?

    7. Mental_Sandwich8515 on

      Where did the money go? Surprised there’s no assets they could take to recoup the money.

    8. Plus_Competition3316 on

      “They didn’t live a particularly lavish lifestyle.”

      I live right next to Sunderland, majority of it is a shithole. And apparently she has no cash assets. I’d love to see her bank statements to see where they’ve spent £300,000 whilst living in Sunderland.

    9. >Prosecutor Neil Jones told the hearing: “She has no available amount to satisfy the order. There is absolutely, definitely, no available sum.”

      What happened to the money? HMRC must know where the money was paid into, can they or the police examine that/ those bank account(s).

    10. I feel that tax fraud should be punished more severely because it represents not only material theft but also an utter disregard and disdain for the wellbeing of the community. To me, that seems more severe.

    11. Cheap_Answer5746 on

      Only mitigation is MPs cooking expenses. MPs go to their next cabinet post while ordinary  get court. 

    12. There should be a rule that when you steal do jot matter who you are and what you steal you have to give back at least 150%

    13. Will HMRC use AI and automate the benefit systems? So less chance of this happening again.

    14. yourlocallidl on

      And HMRC sent me a bill because some stupid idiot can’t do their job on their end.

    15. When are people who steal and take going to actually have to pay back the costs of what they steal? Don’t care if they don’t have the money, that’s tough, don’t steal

    16. _cookie_crumbles on

      Good for her. I wish I had an opportunity to pull scum like that knowing how weak UK justice system is.