Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims | BMC Medical Research Methodology
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-025-02581-7
Posted by OpticalData
Critically appraising the cass report: methodological flaws and unsupported claims | BMC Medical Research Methodology
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-025-02581-7
Posted by OpticalData
3 Comments
Policy should be supported good science, if they’ve used bad science the report authors should be hauled up before parliament and made to answer for themselves for misleading parliament and the nation.
Punishment, I’ve no idea because they, like Wakefield, will probably bugger off to America and either make themselves a martyr for the right or end-up employed at Trump University’s School of Bigly MAGA Science.
Woman complains about missing a few football games for breaking conduct rules – 1000 comments top of the sub.
Pretty signficant paper on the report that gets cited here 140 times a day, crickets
It really is sad the lack of traction this will get here.
No bots, and not bigoted bias being tickled just the right way.
It really was wild how the cass review got published and everyone lost thier fucking minds, but no one actually read any of it. Like, if you buy the hype then you’re very concerned about bunk science… wanna check that your stuff isn’t bunk then? No? Okay.