> The hypothetical particle, known as toponium, would be the result of **merging a top quark and antiquark** as well as the last missing example of quark-antiquark states known as quarkonium.
> This discovery was something of an accident, as it emerged out of the search for new types of Higgs bosons. Instead of bosons, what came up was a signal from a type of fermion—a particle whose spin has only odd half-integer values such as 1/2 or 3/2. The particular fermion they found is a top quark.
> Top quarks, in particular, are already the heaviest known elementary particles—the basic particles that makes up matter—clocking in at 184 times the mass of a proton. Some quarks produced from smashed protons are massive enough to decay into top quark-antiquark pairs, or tt-bar. If this happens, protons will disintegrate into streams of particles.
> But wait—shouldn’t a matter and antimatter particle annihilate each other? **Usually, but not in this scenario.** Instead, the top quarks decay into a bottom quark and a W boson, which is one of two bosons responsible for the weak force. **That doesn’t happen in any other bound matter-antimatter pair that we know of,** and it happens in the time it takes for light to travel just one femtometer, which is one tenth of one quadrillionth of a meter.
NameLips on
“hypothetical particle?”
Does that mean the math checks out, but they haven’t actually seen/made/discovered one yet?
Jepp_Gogi on
I need to sit down. My dinner plans have radically changed.
SEND_ME_CSGO-SKINS on
How do they even detect these things when they can’t exactly shine a light on it?
labria86 on
They’ve never seen anything like it??? Probably because it’s so small.
predat3d on
>They’ve Never Seen Anything Like It
Well, duh. It’s smaller than visible light can discern.
7 Comments
> The hypothetical particle, known as toponium, would be the result of **merging a top quark and antiquark** as well as the last missing example of quark-antiquark states known as quarkonium.
> This discovery was something of an accident, as it emerged out of the search for new types of Higgs bosons. Instead of bosons, what came up was a signal from a type of fermion—a particle whose spin has only odd half-integer values such as 1/2 or 3/2. The particular fermion they found is a top quark.
> Top quarks, in particular, are already the heaviest known elementary particles—the basic particles that makes up matter—clocking in at 184 times the mass of a proton. Some quarks produced from smashed protons are massive enough to decay into top quark-antiquark pairs, or tt-bar. If this happens, protons will disintegrate into streams of particles.
> But wait—shouldn’t a matter and antimatter particle annihilate each other? **Usually, but not in this scenario.** Instead, the top quarks decay into a bottom quark and a W boson, which is one of two bosons responsible for the weak force. **That doesn’t happen in any other bound matter-antimatter pair that we know of,** and it happens in the time it takes for light to travel just one femtometer, which is one tenth of one quadrillionth of a meter.
“hypothetical particle?”
Does that mean the math checks out, but they haven’t actually seen/made/discovered one yet?
I need to sit down. My dinner plans have radically changed.
How do they even detect these things when they can’t exactly shine a light on it?
They’ve never seen anything like it??? Probably because it’s so small.
>They’ve Never Seen Anything Like It
Well, duh. It’s smaller than visible light can discern.
“Physics” is Nature’s ineffable name
for [milliards](https://g.co/kgs/prhd9df) and millards and millards
of particles playing their infinite game
of billiards and billiards and billiards.
– – Piet Hein, [*Grooks*](https://g.co/kgs/YgbLZp1)