Spoiler alert: no other viable launch cadence. The others are very expensive.
That aside, nonsense hit piece. No scrambling is happening.
From_Ancient_Stars on
Washington Post is owned by Bezos. Who do you think is the alternative being implied here?
KappaBera on
[Heavy Russian accent]: Mother Russia, she stands ready to answer MAGA Trump’s call for spacelift. The Donald is good with the Putin. Roscosmos to the rescue. Close eyes, this will hurt.
d1rr on
Yes, good luck doing things the old fashioned way.
Capn_Chryssalid on
Article title is missing the “we hope” at the beginning or end. Also a mysterious “JB” as co-author.
Fiveofthem on
That’s one way to save Boeing from themselves.
Decronym on
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|CST|(Boeing) Crew Space Transportation capsules|
| |Central Standard Time (UTC-6)|
|EELV|[Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolved_Expendable_Launch_Vehicle)|
|[HLS](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwjs5kq “Last usage”)|[Human Landing System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program#Human_Landing_System) (Artemis)|
|[MEO](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwjwcpl “Last usage”)|Medium Earth Orbit (2000-35780km)|
|[NSSL](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwjxhog “Last usage”)|National Security Space Launch, formerly EELV|
|[Roscosmos](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwj2i2n “Last usage”)|[State Corporation for Space Activities, Russia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roscosmos_State_Corporation)|
|[ULA](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwja09d “Last usage”)|United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture)|
Starliner should have been flying astronauts regularly by now. That was the whole point of the commercial crew program, having two different partners for redundancy. Blame the incompetent legacy contractors for this one.
8 Comments
Spoiler alert: no other viable launch cadence. The others are very expensive.
That aside, nonsense hit piece. No scrambling is happening.
Washington Post is owned by Bezos. Who do you think is the alternative being implied here?
[Heavy Russian accent]: Mother Russia, she stands ready to answer MAGA Trump’s call for spacelift. The Donald is good with the Putin. Roscosmos to the rescue. Close eyes, this will hurt.
Yes, good luck doing things the old fashioned way.
Article title is missing the “we hope” at the beginning or end. Also a mysterious “JB” as co-author.
That’s one way to save Boeing from themselves.
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:
|Fewer Letters|More Letters|
|——-|———|—|
|CST|(Boeing) Crew Space Transportation capsules|
| |Central Standard Time (UTC-6)|
|EELV|[Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolved_Expendable_Launch_Vehicle)|
|[HLS](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwjs5kq “Last usage”)|[Human Landing System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program#Human_Landing_System) (Artemis)|
|[MEO](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwjwcpl “Last usage”)|Medium Earth Orbit (2000-35780km)|
|[NSSL](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwjxhog “Last usage”)|National Security Space Launch, formerly EELV|
|[Roscosmos](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwj2i2n “Last usage”)|[State Corporation for Space Activities, Russia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roscosmos_State_Corporation)|
|[ULA](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwja09d “Last usage”)|United Launch Alliance (Lockheed/Boeing joint venture)|
|Jargon|Definition|
|——-|———|—|
|[Starliner](/r/Space/comments/1l5r52g/stub/mwk0fbd “Last usage”)|Boeing commercial crew capsule [CST-100](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_CST-100_Starliner)|
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
—————-
^(6 acronyms in this thread; )[^(the most compressed thread commented on today)](/r/Space/comments/1l49g2f)^( has 43 acronyms.)
^([Thread #11421 for this sub, first seen 7th Jun 2025, 21:23])
^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)
Starliner should have been flying astronauts regularly by now. That was the whole point of the commercial crew program, having two different partners for redundancy. Blame the incompetent legacy contractors for this one.