Yank religious lobbyists not getting what they want. Lovely.
Current_Pitch8944 on
How does this work? I understand that abortions are legal upto 6 months.
What does this mean?
spicy_buns on
I’m so happy about this, fuck getting arrested for what happens inside of my own god damn body.
Ecstatic_Lion4224 on
Seems wise to get rid of any vagueness or opportunity to use outdated legislation against essentially desperate women in future if we’re under any threat from a Russia/US paid government in a few years.
And as I don’t think this will register as news for most people, a good reminder that Britain is a very different country from those lunatics across the Atlantic who keep sending us their best bots and trolls.
steepleton on
Abortion is never great, no one goes into it without deep emotional struggles, it should not be a criminal offence to police your own body
Nah, I’m as pro abortion as they come and this is a bad thing.
Surely, at some point, the foetus is able to survive on its own, and therefore has a reasonable right to life, and indeed care by it’s providers? How can a mother take planned, deliberate actions to end her foetus’ life and garner sympathy, but do the same thing potentially 24 hours later and be a heinous baby murderer? Also, what about the rights of the father – in an instance at, say 8 months, where many babies are born naturally anyways, and the mother chooses to end the foetus’ life, does the father have no rights, no choice, no ability to have justice for a life that may be snatched away from him mere days/weeks from it all?
I get that current abortion laws are outdated and needs reworking. Have the argument for when a foetus can be reasonably considered alive, have the argument about medical complications, or DV or whatever – I’m no doctor and don’t really have an educated view on the matter. But to assume all late stage terminations are where the mother is a victim is nuts. Otherwise we should apply that same rationale to other crimes as well.
As usual, women are somehow described as the victims in their own criminal actions. The woman who was on trial last year deliberately chose to investigate late stage abortion. She deliberately misled medical personnel because she knew it was wrong. If the intent of a thing is bad and it is a bad action…when does it count as a crime?
Verbal_v2 on
So just to be clear, my eldest son was born naturally, healthy but small at 36 weeks, are we really saying if we’d have aborted before natural birth this would now be legal?
How people rejoice at this is beyond me,.
Dependent-Loss-4080 on
Hmmm. On the one hand, there is a point where abortion becomes nothing more than killing a baby, with the only distinction being an arbitrary line. On the other, abortion is already implicitly recognised to be separate from murder in that there are defences to abortion which are not available to the offence of murder. You cannot excuse yourself from murder because the person you killed would have suffered “such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”, or because of the risk of grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman. So the law treats abortion as a medical procedure, and there is a separate offence of procuring an abortion, as opposed to considering it to be murder.
Plus-Literature-7221 on
So aborting healthy babies right up until birth is now perfectly legal.
What a disgusting country the UK has become.
mustwinfullGaming on
People saying this is a bad thing boggle the mind. Do you really think a system that forces women to have children (yes, even if it’s late stage) under threat of criminal sanction is the one thing that’s stopping them? And even if it is, is that a good thing? A person who’s eight months pregnant going “oh, I would have aborted this fetus but I guess I could get prosecuted so I won’t”. Throwing women in prison for this and prosecuting them doesn’t really seem like it’s in the public interest. Especially when if a parent doesn’t want their kid, that can lead to big issues down the line, potentially in the care system and elsewhere. What public interest is being served here?
EDIT: Also seen some good points around people needing support and the like if they’re trying to/aborting that late, not criminal sanctions, and I agree.
ash_ninetyone on
Good. Abortion should always be a matter of individual conscience, not an outlawed taboo
malacki655 on
I’m going to get downvoted and called a Puritan, a religious nutjob, and every other name under the sun, but I will say this anyway. How are people celebrating this? This law means a woman can abort a fetus up to the point of birth and not get prosecuted! Even when the fetus can survive on its own and is near-indistinguishable from a newborn. I mean, what difference really is there between a fetus one hour before birth and a baby one hour after birth? This is vile and should not be celebrated.
SpoofExcel on
ITT: people who seem to think you can abort a baby instantly.
“What’s the difference between an hour before or after birth” – probably the kicking and screaming that would come from trying to rip it out of someone/the baby itself being out and alive way before any abortion pill could take effect.
The effectiveness of abortion pills beyond even 15 weeks is not great without multiple doses. Beyond 25 weeks has a very poor effectiveness rate, and if you’re at 35 weeks and take it you’re more likely to trigger labour than an abortion.
The main point of what had happened today is to make sure that the EXTREMELY rare cases where a woman chooses a late stage termination don’t outweigh the times a pregnancy can result in a late stage miscarriage leading to police investigating devastated women who have gone through a hell-on-earth situation.
14 Comments
Yank religious lobbyists not getting what they want. Lovely.
How does this work? I understand that abortions are legal upto 6 months.
What does this mean?
I’m so happy about this, fuck getting arrested for what happens inside of my own god damn body.
Seems wise to get rid of any vagueness or opportunity to use outdated legislation against essentially desperate women in future if we’re under any threat from a Russia/US paid government in a few years.
And as I don’t think this will register as news for most people, a good reminder that Britain is a very different country from those lunatics across the Atlantic who keep sending us their best bots and trolls.
Abortion is never great, no one goes into it without deep emotional struggles, it should not be a criminal offence to police your own body
[Votes by MPs here](https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons/Division/2058)
Nah, I’m as pro abortion as they come and this is a bad thing.
Surely, at some point, the foetus is able to survive on its own, and therefore has a reasonable right to life, and indeed care by it’s providers? How can a mother take planned, deliberate actions to end her foetus’ life and garner sympathy, but do the same thing potentially 24 hours later and be a heinous baby murderer? Also, what about the rights of the father – in an instance at, say 8 months, where many babies are born naturally anyways, and the mother chooses to end the foetus’ life, does the father have no rights, no choice, no ability to have justice for a life that may be snatched away from him mere days/weeks from it all?
I get that current abortion laws are outdated and needs reworking. Have the argument for when a foetus can be reasonably considered alive, have the argument about medical complications, or DV or whatever – I’m no doctor and don’t really have an educated view on the matter. But to assume all late stage terminations are where the mother is a victim is nuts. Otherwise we should apply that same rationale to other crimes as well.
As usual, women are somehow described as the victims in their own criminal actions. The woman who was on trial last year deliberately chose to investigate late stage abortion. She deliberately misled medical personnel because she knew it was wrong. If the intent of a thing is bad and it is a bad action…when does it count as a crime?
So just to be clear, my eldest son was born naturally, healthy but small at 36 weeks, are we really saying if we’d have aborted before natural birth this would now be legal?
How people rejoice at this is beyond me,.
Hmmm. On the one hand, there is a point where abortion becomes nothing more than killing a baby, with the only distinction being an arbitrary line. On the other, abortion is already implicitly recognised to be separate from murder in that there are defences to abortion which are not available to the offence of murder. You cannot excuse yourself from murder because the person you killed would have suffered “such physical or mental abnormalities as to be seriously handicapped”, or because of the risk of grave permanent injury to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman. So the law treats abortion as a medical procedure, and there is a separate offence of procuring an abortion, as opposed to considering it to be murder.
So aborting healthy babies right up until birth is now perfectly legal.
What a disgusting country the UK has become.
People saying this is a bad thing boggle the mind. Do you really think a system that forces women to have children (yes, even if it’s late stage) under threat of criminal sanction is the one thing that’s stopping them? And even if it is, is that a good thing? A person who’s eight months pregnant going “oh, I would have aborted this fetus but I guess I could get prosecuted so I won’t”. Throwing women in prison for this and prosecuting them doesn’t really seem like it’s in the public interest. Especially when if a parent doesn’t want their kid, that can lead to big issues down the line, potentially in the care system and elsewhere. What public interest is being served here?
EDIT: Also seen some good points around people needing support and the like if they’re trying to/aborting that late, not criminal sanctions, and I agree.
Good. Abortion should always be a matter of individual conscience, not an outlawed taboo
I’m going to get downvoted and called a Puritan, a religious nutjob, and every other name under the sun, but I will say this anyway. How are people celebrating this? This law means a woman can abort a fetus up to the point of birth and not get prosecuted! Even when the fetus can survive on its own and is near-indistinguishable from a newborn. I mean, what difference really is there between a fetus one hour before birth and a baby one hour after birth? This is vile and should not be celebrated.
ITT: people who seem to think you can abort a baby instantly.
“What’s the difference between an hour before or after birth” – probably the kicking and screaming that would come from trying to rip it out of someone/the baby itself being out and alive way before any abortion pill could take effect.
The effectiveness of abortion pills beyond even 15 weeks is not great without multiple doses. Beyond 25 weeks has a very poor effectiveness rate, and if you’re at 35 weeks and take it you’re more likely to trigger labour than an abortion.
The main point of what had happened today is to make sure that the EXTREMELY rare cases where a woman chooses a late stage termination don’t outweigh the times a pregnancy can result in a late stage miscarriage leading to police investigating devastated women who have gone through a hell-on-earth situation.