And what they going to do about reddit that is a far easier accessible porn source? These things are always silly and just push people to other sources
erbr on
lol “… demanding photo ID or running credit card …” I guess mainstream p*** will be anymore… Kids will continue to watch whatever they want. Sometimes, I think whoever is in power doesn’t know the internet. It’s like putting a fancy gate but still missing the fence.
light_to_shaddow on
How will this affect my visits to Pornhub that I make using a VPN?
JackStrawWitchita on
Apparently no one in the UK government has never heard of VPNs. I can assure you that every single teenager knows what a VPN is and how to use them. These restrictions will not at all stop young people from accessing this material. These new laws will only assist scammers and hackers in stealing identities.
wisperingdeth on
Yeah noticed the same with Xhamster giving warning notices. VPN it is then!
jesushadfatlegs on
They will probably try and make VPNs illegal when this doesn’t work.
Stubbzyy on
Anyone got that image of the gate in the middle of nowhere with no fence. This is that. Utterly pointless.
Just because the policy makers have 0 understanding of the Internet đ¤Śââď¸ They seem to think because *they* can’t think of a way around it, that todays kids are not already discussing how to get around this if they don’t already know about VPNs
ExtremelyFilthyWhore on
I remember the good old days of downloading porn on Limewire. Literally the best porn of all time.
sxeros on
What about Google Image Search ? You only need to select one option to unblur the results.
FcukTheTories on
Havenât we been talking about this for nearly 10 years now?
rjwv88 on
Incredibly naive law – itâs just going to push people towards shadier, unregulated sites (to quote a prominent scientist, âlife will find a wayâ, especially when talking about teenagers and porn :p)
far better to invest in educational materials, resources for parents etc, content filtering/gatekeeping always backfires ><
(Couldnât do my a-level physics coursework at school cause ârodâ in âgraphite rodâ was filtered⌠and somehow router-level filtering once blacklisted the BBCs entire website for my parents, that was a fun tech help job XD)
JoeyJoJoeJr_Shabadoo on
I’d been worried about how the generations under millennials seem to be regressing in computer ability, so it’s nice to hear that they now have a reason to learn some new subversion skills.
RightEejit on
I have a kinda similar take to this as people often do to legalising drugs.
It’s often safer to have an easily accessible legitimate source than push people to a sketchy source. if all the legit porn sites implement age verification, people including underage teens, will find other sources that are less regulated, and have sketchier content.
Underage teens will not just stop when they see that verification page, they will keep digging.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
tinytinycommander on
This is concerning. They’ve pushed back against similar laws across the world, the fact they’re rolling over and accepting it in the UK either means we’re such a big market they can’t afford to close here for a few months, which is extremely unlikely, or their legal advice suggests there’s no possible avenues left to fight against the Online Safety Act.
Chemistry-Deep on
“Click YES if you are you over 18”
<clicks yes>
“Welcome to PornHub”
limeflavoured on
All the people going on about VPNs and how this won’t actually make a difference. Most people, even teenagers, are not Redditors and won’t be arsed to set up a VPN to watch porn, so it will make *some* difference. Whether it will make as much difference as the government hopes is an entirely different matter.
Inner-Rhubarb-1757 on
This just feels like another half-baked attempt at “protecting the kids” that’ll drive traffic to sketchier sites. If teens can bypass school filters to watch TikTok, they’ll find a way around this too. Classic case of politicians treating the internet like a physical space they can police with ID checks.
circleribbey on
Canât wait to apply for my government wanking licence. Wonder if youâll be able to get them at the post office.
Fuck_your_future_ on
Onus should be on the parents to protect their children online.
Remote_Appeal_1133 on
All this will do is drive people (including -18) to less legitimate and moderated websites, people will be exposed to more extreme and sketchy home made porn.
No_Basket3832 on
Ok….so now what about women shaking their asses for minors on Twitch? what about try on hauls on youtube where it’s basically just women wearing see through dresses and wiggling their tits and ass, oh right i forgot they said it’s not sexually gratifying so that makes it ok.
mw3915 on
Another sign that our politicians are woefully tech illiterate. Any teenager that wants to see porn can use a VPN or visit any of the less mainstream sites that couldn’t care less about verifying ages.
SeaBluvs on
Iâm surprised if PornHub are actually going to do this. In the US, they simply block the website in affected states because the age checks are a huge privacy risk.
Ironically, Iâm literally writing up a VPN article at the moment on this exact subject. The checks wonât do anything. Everyone and his dog can simply sidestep them with a VPN. The people thisâll hurt are the adults who donât realise that and hand their ID to websites with poor privacy practices (this wonât just affect PornHub).
KenDTree on
Bye Pornhub, this along with all the bans in American states, it was a long run
CaptMelonfish on
in unrelated news, the VPN industry has noted a sharp rise in need for their services.
WVVVWVWVVVVWVWVVVVVW on
I completely agree with the need to safeguard children from these websites however:
1) It doesn’t take a genius to be able to circumvent these checks… Just look at how there’s ten new piracy streaming websites for every one taken down.
2) Social media is flooded with provocative content. Even when you make a brand new account, the feed drops this type of thing in and it’s hard to avoid. Even when clicking not-interested on every single one, they’ll try to push it back through.
3) Creating a framework for ID checks on websites sets a precedent for restricting the freedom of the internet and privacy.
4) Look at Australia who tried to do a similar thing, spent something like 200 million dollars… And then abandoned the whole idea. With the UK’s track record of overspending, delaying and cancelling, I won’t be surprised with how this goes.
Okay so even if it isn’t 100% fool proof, should we do it anyway to make access harder? Well let’s look at piracy as the best example of how it only gets easier to access every year. The days of limewire torrents are replaced with interfaces better than Netflix’s.
I think most kids are just curious but good at heart. We should be spreading awareness of how industry is rife with extreme exploitation and abuse during the sex-education curriculum in primary schools.
gravemarkerr on
All it’ll take is a single data breach to expose a bunch of MPs’, ahem, proclivities, for them to start backpedaling.
28 Comments
And what they going to do about reddit that is a far easier accessible porn source? These things are always silly and just push people to other sources
lol “… demanding photo ID or running credit card …” I guess mainstream p*** will be anymore… Kids will continue to watch whatever they want. Sometimes, I think whoever is in power doesn’t know the internet. It’s like putting a fancy gate but still missing the fence.
How will this affect my visits to Pornhub that I make using a VPN?
Apparently no one in the UK government has never heard of VPNs. I can assure you that every single teenager knows what a VPN is and how to use them. These restrictions will not at all stop young people from accessing this material. These new laws will only assist scammers and hackers in stealing identities.
Yeah noticed the same with Xhamster giving warning notices. VPN it is then!
They will probably try and make VPNs illegal when this doesn’t work.
Anyone got that image of the gate in the middle of nowhere with no fence. This is that. Utterly pointless.
Just because the policy makers have 0 understanding of the Internet đ¤Śââď¸ They seem to think because *they* can’t think of a way around it, that todays kids are not already discussing how to get around this if they don’t already know about VPNs
I remember the good old days of downloading porn on Limewire. Literally the best porn of all time.
What about Google Image Search ? You only need to select one option to unblur the results.
Havenât we been talking about this for nearly 10 years now?
Incredibly naive law – itâs just going to push people towards shadier, unregulated sites (to quote a prominent scientist, âlife will find a wayâ, especially when talking about teenagers and porn :p)
far better to invest in educational materials, resources for parents etc, content filtering/gatekeeping always backfires ><
(Couldnât do my a-level physics coursework at school cause ârodâ in âgraphite rodâ was filtered⌠and somehow router-level filtering once blacklisted the BBCs entire website for my parents, that was a fun tech help job XD)
I’d been worried about how the generations under millennials seem to be regressing in computer ability, so it’s nice to hear that they now have a reason to learn some new subversion skills.
I have a kinda similar take to this as people often do to legalising drugs.
It’s often safer to have an easily accessible legitimate source than push people to a sketchy source. if all the legit porn sites implement age verification, people including underage teens, will find other sources that are less regulated, and have sketchier content.
Underage teens will not just stop when they see that verification page, they will keep digging.
[deleted]
This is concerning. They’ve pushed back against similar laws across the world, the fact they’re rolling over and accepting it in the UK either means we’re such a big market they can’t afford to close here for a few months, which is extremely unlikely, or their legal advice suggests there’s no possible avenues left to fight against the Online Safety Act.
“Click YES if you are you over 18”
<clicks yes>
“Welcome to PornHub”
All the people going on about VPNs and how this won’t actually make a difference. Most people, even teenagers, are not Redditors and won’t be arsed to set up a VPN to watch porn, so it will make *some* difference. Whether it will make as much difference as the government hopes is an entirely different matter.
This just feels like another half-baked attempt at “protecting the kids” that’ll drive traffic to sketchier sites. If teens can bypass school filters to watch TikTok, they’ll find a way around this too. Classic case of politicians treating the internet like a physical space they can police with ID checks.
Canât wait to apply for my government wanking licence. Wonder if youâll be able to get them at the post office.
Onus should be on the parents to protect their children online.
All this will do is drive people (including -18) to less legitimate and moderated websites, people will be exposed to more extreme and sketchy home made porn.
Ok….so now what about women shaking their asses for minors on Twitch? what about try on hauls on youtube where it’s basically just women wearing see through dresses and wiggling their tits and ass, oh right i forgot they said it’s not sexually gratifying so that makes it ok.
Another sign that our politicians are woefully tech illiterate. Any teenager that wants to see porn can use a VPN or visit any of the less mainstream sites that couldn’t care less about verifying ages.
Iâm surprised if PornHub are actually going to do this. In the US, they simply block the website in affected states because the age checks are a huge privacy risk.
Ironically, Iâm literally writing up a VPN article at the moment on this exact subject. The checks wonât do anything. Everyone and his dog can simply sidestep them with a VPN. The people thisâll hurt are the adults who donât realise that and hand their ID to websites with poor privacy practices (this wonât just affect PornHub).
Bye Pornhub, this along with all the bans in American states, it was a long run
in unrelated news, the VPN industry has noted a sharp rise in need for their services.
I completely agree with the need to safeguard children from these websites however:
1) It doesn’t take a genius to be able to circumvent these checks… Just look at how there’s ten new piracy streaming websites for every one taken down.
2) Social media is flooded with provocative content. Even when you make a brand new account, the feed drops this type of thing in and it’s hard to avoid. Even when clicking not-interested on every single one, they’ll try to push it back through.
3) Creating a framework for ID checks on websites sets a precedent for restricting the freedom of the internet and privacy.
4) Look at Australia who tried to do a similar thing, spent something like 200 million dollars… And then abandoned the whole idea. With the UK’s track record of overspending, delaying and cancelling, I won’t be surprised with how this goes.
Okay so even if it isn’t 100% fool proof, should we do it anyway to make access harder? Well let’s look at piracy as the best example of how it only gets easier to access every year. The days of limewire torrents are replaced with interfaces better than Netflix’s.
I think most kids are just curious but good at heart. We should be spreading awareness of how industry is rife with extreme exploitation and abuse during the sex-education curriculum in primary schools.
All it’ll take is a single data breach to expose a bunch of MPs’, ahem, proclivities, for them to start backpedaling.