Submission statement: Do you think it’s a good idea to give AIs weapons and teach them to kill humans?
Human armies will sometimes resist evil commands from on high. An AI army won’t have such compunctions.
Or it might *disobey* its human leaders, which also doesn’t sound good come to think of it.
Do you think every nation would benefit from an enforceable treaty? How could we make an enforceable treaty to prevent the spread and use of robot armies.
Sad-Attempt6263 on
with ukraines participation in the Ottawa treaty unofficially null till December, ap mine laying drones whether baba yaga or perun heavy lift drone means a new avenue for potential drones offensive. same with Russian drones (I don’t know any of their bomber drones)
snowbirdnerd on
Smart weapons are not new. Weapons that track and target people themselves isn’t new.
We have had smart bombs and missiles that select and track targets for decades, this is just the first time we have seen something like this in use during a major conflict. It’s also the most accessible we have ever had to war footage.
This has really surprised people about the realities of war.
Uh, yeah. But they’re not AGI, and an AGI wouldn’t have to be taught to know that guns can kill people. It’s always going to be about who or what is in control of the murder drones. They’re not really adding risk by doing *this*.
faultysynapse on
Weapons made to kill might harm us all? Nooo… How could that be?
Ffs people.
Unasked_for_advice on
It is very naive to think this sort of technology is not being worked on by other countries.
FuturologyBot on
The following submission statement was provided by /u/katxwoods:
—
Submission statement: Do you think it’s a good idea to give AIs weapons and teach them to kill humans?
Human armies will sometimes resist evil commands from on high. An AI army won’t have such compunctions.
Or it might *disobey* its human leaders, which also doesn’t sound good come to think of it.
Do you think every nation would benefit from an enforceable treaty? How could we make an enforceable treaty to prevent the spread and use of robot armies.
The following submission statement was provided by /u/katxwoods:
—
Submission statement: Do you think it’s a good idea to give AIs weapons and teach them to kill humans?
Human armies will sometimes resist evil commands from on high. An AI army won’t have such compunctions.
Or it might *disobey* its human leaders, which also doesn’t sound good come to think of it.
Do you think every nation would benefit from an enforceable treaty? How could we make an enforceable treaty to prevent the spread and use of robot armies.
Seeing how badly LLM’s hallucinate, this can only go poorly.
etzel1200 on
Giving the drones AI basically isn’t relevant.
Giving data centers long term planning and agency is.
The drone is just a drone. The data center can build a drone factory.
IfonlyIwastheOne83 on
This was in a movie
I don’t know how much easier it can be to prevent stupidity
H0vis on
This is why it was in the best interests of the entire world to step on this shit ASAP.
When historians talk about the dangers of appeasement they generally have a point. This sort of unintended consequence is what we have always had to be wary of.
Winter_Criticism_236 on
What about open source warfare, civilian’s can launch low cost drones at high value target’s, anyone along the free side of the Russian border could cause havoc with zero risk.. Also if we are the presently the universal soldier then drones may enable war without standing army or conscription.
13 Comments
Submission statement: Do you think it’s a good idea to give AIs weapons and teach them to kill humans?
Human armies will sometimes resist evil commands from on high. An AI army won’t have such compunctions.
Or it might *disobey* its human leaders, which also doesn’t sound good come to think of it.
Do you think every nation would benefit from an enforceable treaty? How could we make an enforceable treaty to prevent the spread and use of robot armies.
with ukraines participation in the Ottawa treaty unofficially null till December, ap mine laying drones whether baba yaga or perun heavy lift drone means a new avenue for potential drones offensive. same with Russian drones (I don’t know any of their bomber drones)
Smart weapons are not new. Weapons that track and target people themselves isn’t new.
We have had smart bombs and missiles that select and track targets for decades, this is just the first time we have seen something like this in use during a major conflict. It’s also the most accessible we have ever had to war footage.
This has really surprised people about the realities of war.
“Talking point: Perfect deadly pilotless drones might actually harm humans”
Uh, yeah. But they’re not AGI, and an AGI wouldn’t have to be taught to know that guns can kill people. It’s always going to be about who or what is in control of the murder drones. They’re not really adding risk by doing *this*.
Weapons made to kill might harm us all? Nooo… How could that be?
Ffs people.
It is very naive to think this sort of technology is not being worked on by other countries.
The following submission statement was provided by /u/katxwoods:
—
Submission statement: Do you think it’s a good idea to give AIs weapons and teach them to kill humans?
Human armies will sometimes resist evil commands from on high. An AI army won’t have such compunctions.
Or it might *disobey* its human leaders, which also doesn’t sound good come to think of it.
Do you think every nation would benefit from an enforceable treaty? How could we make an enforceable treaty to prevent the spread and use of robot armies.
—
Please reply to OP’s comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/1lofbaa/killing_machines_how_russia_and_ukraines_race_to/n0mfsf7/
The following submission statement was provided by /u/katxwoods:
—
Submission statement: Do you think it’s a good idea to give AIs weapons and teach them to kill humans?
Human armies will sometimes resist evil commands from on high. An AI army won’t have such compunctions.
Or it might *disobey* its human leaders, which also doesn’t sound good come to think of it.
Do you think every nation would benefit from an enforceable treaty? How could we make an enforceable treaty to prevent the spread and use of robot armies.
—
Please reply to OP’s comment here: https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/1lofbaa/killing_machines_how_russia_and_ukraines_race_to/n0mfsf7/
Seeing how badly LLM’s hallucinate, this can only go poorly.
Giving the drones AI basically isn’t relevant.
Giving data centers long term planning and agency is.
The drone is just a drone. The data center can build a drone factory.
This was in a movie
I don’t know how much easier it can be to prevent stupidity
This is why it was in the best interests of the entire world to step on this shit ASAP.
When historians talk about the dangers of appeasement they generally have a point. This sort of unintended consequence is what we have always had to be wary of.
What about open source warfare, civilian’s can launch low cost drones at high value target’s, anyone along the free side of the Russian border could cause havoc with zero risk.. Also if we are the presently the universal soldier then drones may enable war without standing army or conscription.