“The computer scientist regarded as the “godfather of artificial intelligence” says the government will have to establish a universal basic income to deal with the impact of AI on inequality.
Professor Geoffrey Hinton told BBC Newsnight that a benefits reform giving fixed amounts of cash to every citizen would be needed because he was “very worried about AI taking lots of mundane jobs”.
**“I was consulted by people in Downing Street and I advised them that universal basic income was a good idea,” he said.**
lefthandedpen on
Would be an idea to restrict AI use in creative industries, what would we do with all that free time. Create or consume would be our options.
EdmundTheInsulter on
Heard this before. Most people were not going to work by 2000, but apparently we still need imported workers.
TinFish77 on
UBI would need a radical change in attitude to ‘benefits’ in the public mind, that’s generations away from happening. If ever.
That’s before we even get to the negatives of the actual concept, that being the state is your only source of income. Complete control of peoples lives by the state is what it would lead to.
Jaffa_Mistake on
The justification and the rationale behind profit is what drives every facet of the economy. The bourgeoise won’t ever lessen the burden of labour on the working class because it’s threatens their position at the top of the ladder.
Any technological advancement had and has the potential to reduce labour, but that is simply not the reason capitalism exists.
Aggravating-Dot132 on
Ubi can’t work. It’s a monstrocity of the idea iteself. Examples:
1) People get Ubi. They can spend X amount of money on what they need. However, since AI is everywhere, corporates can’t sell them what they need, or it’s limited. Which means, that you will need MORE Ubi to buy stuff Y. Thus the only way to get MORE Ubi is to steal/kill/lie.
2) People get Ubi, AI usage is limited. You still have the same problem of ending goods. Even the baseline “I want to live near beach” is a problem. The price will go UP without any control, making Ubi a useless thing straight out of the gate.
Ubi belongs to r/antiwork and only there. Not in our real world.
badgersruse on
How does being an AI expert make you an expert on economics and social behaviour?
Apprehensive-Sir7063 on
Not if AI robotics and companies are adequately taxed and government mega projects implemented to increase jobs it’ll offset job loss.
Coupled with global tariffs to protect industries.
Robotics will eventually move economies away from consumerism based with consumerism forming only a part,
Mega projects globally are essential to encourage growth. It’ll propel humanity forward.
Universal income can be limited in size to still encourage employment.
8 Comments
“The computer scientist regarded as the “godfather of artificial intelligence” says the government will have to establish a universal basic income to deal with the impact of AI on inequality.
Professor Geoffrey Hinton told BBC Newsnight that a benefits reform giving fixed amounts of cash to every citizen would be needed because he was “very worried about AI taking lots of mundane jobs”.
**“I was consulted by people in Downing Street and I advised them that universal basic income was a good idea,” he said.**
Would be an idea to restrict AI use in creative industries, what would we do with all that free time. Create or consume would be our options.
Heard this before. Most people were not going to work by 2000, but apparently we still need imported workers.
UBI would need a radical change in attitude to ‘benefits’ in the public mind, that’s generations away from happening. If ever.
That’s before we even get to the negatives of the actual concept, that being the state is your only source of income. Complete control of peoples lives by the state is what it would lead to.
The justification and the rationale behind profit is what drives every facet of the economy. The bourgeoise won’t ever lessen the burden of labour on the working class because it’s threatens their position at the top of the ladder.
Any technological advancement had and has the potential to reduce labour, but that is simply not the reason capitalism exists.
Ubi can’t work. It’s a monstrocity of the idea iteself. Examples:
1) People get Ubi. They can spend X amount of money on what they need. However, since AI is everywhere, corporates can’t sell them what they need, or it’s limited. Which means, that you will need MORE Ubi to buy stuff Y. Thus the only way to get MORE Ubi is to steal/kill/lie.
2) People get Ubi, AI usage is limited. You still have the same problem of ending goods. Even the baseline “I want to live near beach” is a problem. The price will go UP without any control, making Ubi a useless thing straight out of the gate.
Ubi belongs to r/antiwork and only there. Not in our real world.
How does being an AI expert make you an expert on economics and social behaviour?
Not if AI robotics and companies are adequately taxed and government mega projects implemented to increase jobs it’ll offset job loss.
Coupled with global tariffs to protect industries.
Robotics will eventually move economies away from consumerism based with consumerism forming only a part,
Mega projects globally are essential to encourage growth. It’ll propel humanity forward.
Universal income can be limited in size to still encourage employment.