Share.

19 Comments

  1. Well, yes, but sign-ups just require supplying an email address, while Labour Party membership requires paying. We’ll have to see how many sign-ups turn into paying members.

  2. On_The_Blindside on

    Sure and when Signing up to a mailing list becomes the same as being a actual paid up member it’ll actually matter.

  3. After-Dentist-2480 on

    “Sign ups”

    You mean giving an email address to receive further details?

  4. More people have a Tesco Clubcard than there are labour members, doesnt mean people would vote for them.

  5. LMFAO

    This is some of the most Corbyn and Anti-Starmer biased reporting I’ve ever seen.

    They’re comparing people who have signed up for a newsletter to get free email updates…. to paid members.

    It’s actually unbelievable how hard the media are trying to tear down the current Labour administation.

  6. Run by a 76 yo that 6 years ago couldn’t work a full day without taking multiple naps, this party wont exist come the next election.

  7. Remember when Chuka Umuna et al tried something similar? What’s the real difference here?

  8. Necessary-Product361 on

    Yes, as every one here is saying, you can’t really compare the two figures. However, you also can’t just discount their 600,000 signups as just for a news letter or as fraudulent. There is clearly a large appetite for this party. Lets say they made the lowest membership option a few quid a month, i don’t see why a large amount of this 600,000 wouldn’t join. If half of those (currently) signed up became members, the party would be the largest in the UK.

  9. wowitsreallymem on

    All of the comments on this post just repeat exactly the same thing, “sign ups are just emails, call me when it’s paying members”.

  10. limeflavoured on

    Its not a new party yet, its a mailing list that is intending ti become a party.

  11. We’d be a much better country with Jezza as PM. He has honesty and integrity in abundance and isn’t a sleekit vote chaser like the other politicians.

  12. saviouroftheweak on

    Everyone in the comments explains the title as if we don’t have basic reading comprehension but only they do.

  13. >increased defence spending at the cost of welfare.

    He has to go and spoil it.

    Russia is waging war in Europe, Ukraine at the moment with an outside chance they might attack Norway at some point. The US is no longer a reliable ally. There are increasing tensions in the middle east, which we don’t necessarily have to get involved in but we might need to for strtegic reasons.

    Nobody likes having to spend money on defence, but if we can’t defend ourselves then the concept of providing welfare could become irrelevant in the future.

  14. As an indie videogame developer I too would be tempted to conflate signups with sales. It would make me seem waaaaaaay more successful.

    In truth I’m mixed about Corbyn and his party; but this is still dishonest reporting regardless.

  15. Good luck to them. Hoping they don’t squander a lead by making silly mistakes.