Great, that means I will not likely live to see the end of the remakes…
Brazilian_Hamilton on
Would be interesting to see this data excluding the original movies that weren’t big enough hits to be worth remaking
FractalHarvest on
in 2088 they will release an original and its remake at the same time
Tofudebeast on
They’ll have to buy up more franchises to remake. Live action Studio Ghibli anyone?
jimmyxs on
Love the satirical spirit behind the graph. They deserved to be called out. Like, who needs a live action version of everything we enjoyed as cartoons and animations as kids
rabbi420 on
Does this really count as data? I mean, you’ve used *some* data, but the rest of it is just a projection of the future, and contains no data.
--zaxell-- on
A while back I ran a similarly-silly projection to conclude that, based on the actors’ ages, the 2047 Spiderman reboot will feature an Aunt May who’s younger than Peter Parker.
matt1250 on
The Year is 2087. Handy Manny has just been green lit for a live action feature length adaptation
Ponchorello7 on
Bold of you to assume they won’t just remake a remake. An animated adaptation of a live action movie that was itself an adaptation of an animated movie.
Stiltz85 on
I feel like the original films would start to flatten out a bit, while the remakes are trending more frequent. 2055-ish makes more sense to me, if not sooner. That is unless Disney tries to adjust this trend directly.
RentAscout on
Needs a third data point, good original films.
exkingzog on
TBH, the rise in remakes looks more exponential than linear. It looks like the intersection will be around 2035.
TokoBlaster on
Coming to a theater near you in 2088: Song of the South
nullstillstands on
Maybe they’ll make a remake of a sequel of a spinoff by then.
salmjak on
The red line looks more exponential than linear.
LadyMillennialFalcon on
They can always make a remake of the remakeÂ
durrtyurr on
You can always do a remake again. Disney did it before with the Jungle Book in 1994 and 2016.
WriterofaDromedary on
Once the red line crosses the blue they’ll be doing remakes of original movies that don’t even exist yet
Meanteenbirder on
I still wonder whether Mufasa is considered a remake or an original film. Would lean towards the latter
suicidemachine on
They will just start making off-spin version of the old movies. There will be a King Lion movie about some hyena trying to break up from his friends etc. Just like they did with the Rocky series – every character is going to have his own movie.
Substantial-Doctor36 on
Great chart and content. You misspelled “does”. Subtitle 2nd sentence.
TheTresStateArea on
The rate of remakes isn’t linear growth. The original to remake ratio is getting smaller and smaller every year.
WanderingStw on
It will also be interesting if we say the number of years between “original” and “remake” – I am guessing that that number is also decreasing over time.
-gatherer on
*does not dose
*based not bassed
*meant not ment
*such not sutch
I’m all for graphs, but good god some basic proofreading would be nice. It’s literally three sentences. I have trouble trusting the quality of the projections when you don’t seem to check your work in the slightest.
alewex on
They’re then gonna release the remake before the original.
Martnz on
To be fair neither plot seems linear. the remakes seems exponential, so I would say the crossing would be earlier as 2088.
Oleynick on
Seems flawed, like why make remake of 1 year movie?
WeAre0N3 on
Never bet against the mouse
SoonerChrisOU on
Live action home on the range is going to be fire /s
31 Comments
Source for release dates from Wikipedia
Then they will start to remake the remakes
Great, that means I will not likely live to see the end of the remakes…
Would be interesting to see this data excluding the original movies that weren’t big enough hits to be worth remaking
in 2088 they will release an original and its remake at the same time
They’ll have to buy up more franchises to remake. Live action Studio Ghibli anyone?
Love the satirical spirit behind the graph. They deserved to be called out. Like, who needs a live action version of everything we enjoyed as cartoons and animations as kids
Does this really count as data? I mean, you’ve used *some* data, but the rest of it is just a projection of the future, and contains no data.
A while back I ran a similarly-silly projection to conclude that, based on the actors’ ages, the 2047 Spiderman reboot will feature an Aunt May who’s younger than Peter Parker.
The Year is 2087. Handy Manny has just been green lit for a live action feature length adaptation
Bold of you to assume they won’t just remake a remake. An animated adaptation of a live action movie that was itself an adaptation of an animated movie.
I feel like the original films would start to flatten out a bit, while the remakes are trending more frequent. 2055-ish makes more sense to me, if not sooner. That is unless Disney tries to adjust this trend directly.
Needs a third data point, good original films.
TBH, the rise in remakes looks more exponential than linear. It looks like the intersection will be around 2035.
Coming to a theater near you in 2088: Song of the South
Maybe they’ll make a remake of a sequel of a spinoff by then.
The red line looks more exponential than linear.
They can always make a remake of the remakeÂ
You can always do a remake again. Disney did it before with the Jungle Book in 1994 and 2016.
Once the red line crosses the blue they’ll be doing remakes of original movies that don’t even exist yet
I still wonder whether Mufasa is considered a remake or an original film. Would lean towards the latter
They will just start making off-spin version of the old movies. There will be a King Lion movie about some hyena trying to break up from his friends etc. Just like they did with the Rocky series – every character is going to have his own movie.
Great chart and content. You misspelled “does”. Subtitle 2nd sentence.
The rate of remakes isn’t linear growth. The original to remake ratio is getting smaller and smaller every year.
It will also be interesting if we say the number of years between “original” and “remake” – I am guessing that that number is also decreasing over time.
*does not dose
*based not bassed
*meant not ment
*such not sutch
I’m all for graphs, but good god some basic proofreading would be nice. It’s literally three sentences. I have trouble trusting the quality of the projections when you don’t seem to check your work in the slightest.
They’re then gonna release the remake before the original.
To be fair neither plot seems linear. the remakes seems exponential, so I would say the crossing would be earlier as 2088.
Seems flawed, like why make remake of 1 year movie?
Never bet against the mouse
Live action home on the range is going to be fire /s