Share.

33 Comments

  1. evenstevens280 on

    This stupid law needs repealing, or at least altering. It’s ridiculous to censor factual (well, at least – peer reviewed) information.

  2. denyer-no1-fan on

    If you haven’t already – you should get VPN, particularly the paid ones if you don’t want data leakage through a free VPN. Looks like I’ll be adding Wikipedia to my list of websites/apps that will have VPN applied automatically.

  3. TheCommieDuck on

    A spokesperson for the Labour Party clarified, “people accessing Wikipedia illegally are terrorist supporters.”

  4. Given the coming of the AI and the fact that Western governments decided to double down on control and oppression, I would highly suggest that people download Wikipedia to their computer now, before it gets compromised too much somehow. It doesn’t take that much space if you only need the text, but also with pictures it shouldn’t be too much for an external hard drive I think.

  5. Remarkable_Battle614 on

    They were always going to lose. Hopefully they’ll block the uk, with a big text saying “due to the uk government, we’re blocking access for uk users. Please contact your MP”

    And see how that goes

  6. This is just fucking unacceptable. There’s no reality where accepting this is okay. If your MP won’t repeal this, then take their fucking seat. Run against them. Fire take. Take their fucking job.

    Edit: I’m fucking tired man. Does anyone know how to register as a candidate for any of Leicesters seats? I’ll do it my fucking self.

  7. Floor-Goblins-Lament on

    I think what is most bizarre to me about this whole act is that none of the politicians supporting it seem to actually know what it does

  8. mcfluffernutter013 on

    Labour has absolutely been shitting the bed and it’s almost funny. Just Torries in red

  9. GarySmith2021 on

    I can’t wait for Wikipedia to block themselves in the UK, to protect children of course…

  10. cosmic_monsters_inc on

    So we’re protecting kids from wiki now? Can we just drop the pretence it had anything to do with porn and is nothing more than a massive online tracking effort.

  11. HorseNCartJohnny on

    Predicted this would happen, I have saved all Wikipedia pages I think I might need, as well as up to level 3 of Wikipedia’s recommended articles as pdfs. Hope it gets pulled from the uk so more people start to kick up a fuss

  12. ilikebiiiigdicks on

    Id write to my MP but its Keir fucking Starmer and he clearly doesn’t listen to good advice.

  13. These-Barnaclez on

    Educate me. What’s stopping Starmer from repealing this law.

    And a serious answer based on the legal restrictions. Not cos he’s a twat

  14. Affectionate_Role849 on

    I hope Labour gets obliterated at the next election like the Tories did, and if Reform get in it’s entirely Labours doing.

  15. I knew this was coming, Starmer was never going to make an exception for anyone as other companies would try to use the exception too

    So Wikipedia will restrict access to UK users and the OSA defenders will continue to lie to you that it is only about protecting children when really the simple but harsh truth is an excuse to bad parents to blame their child neglect on big bad internet companies

  16. FearlessPressure3 on

    I sent a message to my MP complaining about this law and have been totally ignored. Well that’s a vote she’s not getting again from me 😡

  17. I’ve already written to my MP about this, but it’s just going to get worse unless the government repeal it. Introduced by Tories and carried out by Starmer’s Labour, just like everything else.

  18. ConnieTheUnicorn on

    Well..say goodbye to Wikipedia. I hope they don’t capitulate and just go dark in the UK.

  19. > She said they decided that Wikipedia “is in principle an appropriate service on which to impose category one duties” and how ministers arrived at that choice was not “without reasonable foundation nor irrational”.

    [X] Doubt

  20. MammothPenguin69 on

    Britfriends, you now have a universal shutdown phrase for all opposition to repealing the OSA.

    “They blocked Wikipedia.”

    Please use it.

  21. Any_Inflation_2543 on

    I wonder how idiot-in-chief Starmer will explain how losing access to Wikipedia helps fight child pornography…

  22. Do these MPs think kids are going to Wikipedia to find pictures of buttholes? What the fuck is actually happening that the UK is, more-or-less, censoring *the household-name encyclopedia*?

  23. CharmingTurnover8937 on

    I hope Wikipedia and other large websites block us. Don’t bother trying to argue around this ridiculous law, go scorched earth and ban us from everything. Only then will the government get the message.

    The sheer arrogance of our Government to even pass this bill and expect everyone to bow down to it is disgusting. I can’t express how much I despise this administration. They had every chance to try and fix things from the last disastrous government, but instead they chose to continue fucking things up for everyone.

    No Labour. No Tories.

    Never again.

  24. This is more of a “loses on a technicality” based on them not being categorised as Category 1 at this point in time. Idk if you guys read the article or what.

    It probably is stupid that Wikipedia might be treated this way, although there probably is child-inappropriate material on there to be fair.

    But all you people complaining about the OSA need to propose some practical way of addressing the problem, unless you actually think it’s ok for 12 year olds to access porn and terrorist videos (which we certainly didn’t think was acceptable in the pre-Internet era).

  25. Anybody else still think this is about porn websites and child safety? Or are people going to wake up and realise this is censorship and control.

    Im sober of alcohol after a death of a family member, almost 3 years. I use an app called “I am Sober” which has helped me connect with people having similar struggles, but because of the online safety act, i cant access it. Its really bad to cut sombody off from that support network. Thats my point.

  26. Broccoli--Enthusiast on

    I hope they just geoblock the UK

    The ignorant masses might figure out why this is so bad then.

  27. This is authoritarian goverment, just want to remind you guys that UK does not have a constitution like many other Western countries by design to have peasants always enslaved by the ruling class

  28. ImTalkingGibberish on

    Labour gets the chance in a gazillion years because Tories fucked up hilariously and they manage to speed run an even worse leadership.

  29. Official Wikimedia Foundation statement:

    > [UPDATE: On Monday, 11 August, the High Court of Justice dismissed the Wikimedia Foundation’s challenge to the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) Categorisation Regulations. While the decision does not provide the immediate legal protections for Wikipedia that we hoped for, the Court’s ruling emphasized the responsibility of Ofcom and the UK government to ensure Wikipedia is protected as the OSA is implemented.](https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/08/11/wikimedia-foundation-challenges-uk-online-safety-act-regulations/)

    > [The judge recognized the “significant value” of Wikipedia, its safety for users, as well as the damages that wrongly-assigned OSA categorisations and duties could have on the human rights of Wikipedia’s volunteer contributors. The Court stressed that this ruling “does not give Ofcom and the Secretary of State a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia’s operations”, and indicated they could face legal repercussions if they fail to protect Wikipedia and the rights of its users. In order to achieve that outcome, he suggested that Ofcom may need to find a particularly flexible interpretation of the rules in question, or that the rules themselves may need amendment in Parliament.](https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/08/11/wikimedia-foundation-challenges-uk-online-safety-act-regulations/)

    > [If the ruling stands, the first categorization decisions from Ofcom are expected this summer. The Foundation will continue to seek solutions to protect Wikipedia and the rights of its users as the OSA continues to be implemented.](https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/08/11/wikimedia-foundation-challenges-uk-online-safety-act-regulations/)