Xu, L. et al. Impacts of climate change and human activity on the potential distribution of Aconitum Leucostomum in China. Sci. Total Environ. 912 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168829 (2024).
Walther, G. R. et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/416389a (2002).
Hughes, L. Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01764-4 (2000).
Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286 (2003).
Jump, A. S. & Peñuelas, J. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1010–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00796.x (2005).
Wiens, J. J. Climate-Related local extinctions are already widespread among plant and animal species. PLoS Biol. 14, e2001104. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001104 (2016).
Scanes, C. G. Human activity and habitat loss: destruction, fragmentation, and degradation. In Animals and Human Society (ed Scanes, C. G.) 451–482 (Academic, (2018).
Sala, O. E. et al. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 (2000).
Foley, J. A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772 (2005).
Hansen, J. E. & Sato, M. Trends of measured climate forcing agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 14778–14783, (2001). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.261553698
Chinese academy of sciences editorial committee of flora of China. In flora of China. (ed. Wu, Z. Y.) 9, 35. Beijing, (2002).
Zhang, R., Wang, Y. & Shen, S. Chloroplast genome structure and phylogenetic position of Lophatherum gracile. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 5, 2958–2959. https://doi.org/10.1080/23802359.2020.1845577 (2020).
Li, Q., Liu, Y., Bao, H. & Zhang, H. The application of Lophatherum gracile Brongn flavonoids in wheat flour products: effects on the structural and functional characteristics of wheat dough. Foods 13 https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162556 (2024).
He, H. et al. Effects of pretreatment, NaOH concentration, and extraction temperature on the cellulose from Lophatherum gracile Brongn. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 190, 810–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.041 (2021).
Tang, Q. et al. Simultaneous determination of 10 bioactive components of Lophatherum gracile Brongn by HPLC-DAD. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 53, 963–967. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmu160 (2015).
Chen, Y. L., Chen, C. Y., Lai, K. H., Chang, Y. C. & Hwang, T. L. Anti-inflammatory and antiviral activities of flavone C-glycosides of Lophatherum gracile for COVID-19. J. Funct. Foods. 101, 105407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2023.105407 (2023).
Liu, X. et al. Spectrum-effect relationship between ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography fingerprints and antioxidant activities of Lophatherum gracile Brongn. Food Sci. Nutr. 10, 1592–1601. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2782 (2022).
Chen, L. F. et al. Antiviral activity of ethanol extract of Lophatherum gracile against respiratory syncytial virus infection. J. Ethnopharmacol. 242 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2018.10.036 (2019).
Kim, A., Im, M., Gu, M. J. & Ma, J. Y. Ethanol extract of Lophatheri herba exhibits anti-cancer activity in human cancer cells by suppression of metastatic and angiogenic potential. Sci. Rep. 6 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36277 (2016).
Prakash, S. & Verma, A. K. Anthropogenic activities and biodiversity threats. Int. J. Biol. Innov. 4, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.46505/IJBI.2022.4110 (2022).
Srivastava, V., Lafond, V. & Griess, V. C. Species distribution models (SDM): applications, benefits and challenges in invasive species management. CABI Reviews. 1–13. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR201914020 (2019).
Phillips, S. J. et al. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 19, 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-2153.1 (2009).
Heikkinen, R. K. et al. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 30, 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133306071957 (2006).
Guisan, A. & Thuiller, W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8, 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x (2005).
Aiello-Lammens, M. E., Boria, R. A., Radosavljevic, A., Vilela, B. & Anderson, R. P. SpThin: an R package for Spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38, 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01132 (2015).
Boria, R. A., Olson, L. E., Goodman, S. M. & Anderson, R. P. Spatial filtering to reduce sampling bias can improve the performance of ecological niche models. Ecol. Model. 275, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.12.012 (2014).
Pinochet, F. & Thesis, P. D. Regional Climate under SSP245 and SSP585. St. Francis Xavier University (2024). https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14648/65356
Nachtergaele, F. et al. FAO,. Harmonized world soil database version 2.0. (ed. Nachtergaele, F) 1–3 (2023).
Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial human footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data. 3 https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.67 (2016).
Liu, L. A. O. et al. Predicting the potential distribution of Aralia chinensis L. (Wild vegetable) in China under different climate change scenarios. Biology 13 https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13110937 (2024).
Cao, G. et al. Prediction of the potentially suitable areas of eucommia ulmoides Oliver in China under climate change based on optimized Biomod2 and maxent models. Front. Plant. Sci. 15 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1359271 (2024).
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190, 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 (2006).
Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. A. Jr A practical guide to maxent for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36, 1058–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x (2013).
Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: a review of method8s to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x (2013).
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Real, R. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. Glob Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x (2008).
Jiménez-Valverde, A. Insights into the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a discrimination measure in species distribution modelling. Glob Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 498–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00683.x (2012).
Wunderlich, R. F., Lin, Y. P., Anthony, J. & Petway, J. R. Two alternative evaluation metrics to replace the true skill statistic in the assessment of species distribution models. Nat. Conserv. 35, 97–116. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.35.33918 (2019).
Fielding, A. H. & Bell, J. F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088 (1997).
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M. & Townsend Peterson, A. ORIGINAL ARTICLE: predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 34, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x (2007).
Shabani, F., Kumar, L. & Ahmadi, M. Assessing accuracy methods of species distribution models: AUC, specificity, sensitivity and the true skill statistic. GJHSS 18 (1) (2018). https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume18/2-Assessing-Accuracy-Methods.pdf
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x (2006).
Boyce, M. S., Vernier, P. R., Nielsen, S. E. & Schmiegelow, F. K. A. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol. Model. 157, 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00200-4 (2002).
Lu, Z. et al. TSSr: an R package for comprehensive analyses of TSS sequencing data. NAR Genom Bioinform. 3, lqab108. https://doi.org/10.1093/nargab/lqab108 (2021).
Yang, S. et al. Impacts of environment and human activity on grid-scale land cropping suitability and optimization of planting structure, measured based on the maxent model. Sci. Total Environ. 836 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155356 (2022).
Araújo, M. B. & Rahbek, C. How does climate change affect biodiversity? Science 313, 1396–1397. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131758 (2006).
Rinella, M. J., Vermeire, L. T. & Angerer, J. P. Integrating experiments and monitoring reveals extreme sensitivity of invasive winter annuals to precipitation. Ecol. Appl. 34, e3051. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.3051 (2024).
Yang, J. et al. Potential global distribution of setaria italica, an important species for dryland agriculture in the context of climate change. PLoS ONE. 19, e0301751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0301751 (2024).
Cordobés, F. M., Robbiati, F. O., Anton, A. M. & Scrivanti, L. R. Phylogeny, evolution and ecological speciation analyses of imperata (Poaceae: Andropogoneae) in the neotropics. Syst. Biodivers. 19, 526–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2021.1887959 (2021).
Hasigerili et al. Intraspecific variations of adaptive strategies of native and invasive plant species along an elevational gradient. Flora 304 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2023.152297 (2023).
Semeskandi, M. N., Mazloom, P., Arabzadeh, B., Moghadam, M. N. & Ahmadi, T. Evaluation of seedling cultivation and irrigation regimes on yield and yield components in rice plant. Braz J. Biol. 84, e266261. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.266261 (2022).
Durand, M. et al. Diffuse solar radiation and canopy photosynthesis in a changing environment. Agric. Meteorol. 311 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108684 (2021).
Ferraris, R., Mahony, M. & Wood, J. Effect of temperature and solar radiation on the development of dry matter and attributes of elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schum). Aust J. Agric. Res. 37, 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9860621 (1986).
McKinney, M. L. & Lockwood, J. L. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 450–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1 (1999).
Yohannes, H., Soromessa, T., Argaw, M. & Dewan, A. Spatio-temporal changes in habitat quality and linkage with landscape characteristics in the Beressa watershed, blue nile basin of Ethiopian highlands. J. Environ. Manage. 281, 111885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111885 (2021).
Sun, X., Li, Y., Hu, Y. & Li, Y. Human and natural factors affect habitat quality in ecologically fragile areas: evidence from Songnen plain, China. Front. Plant. Sci. 15, 1444163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1444163 (2024).
Huntley, B. How plants respond to climate change: migration rates, individualism and the consequences for plant communities. Ann. Bot. 67, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AOB.A088205 (1991).
Muluneh, M. G. Impact of climate change on biodiversity and food security: a global perspective-a review Article. Agric. Food Secur. 10 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00318-5 (2021).
Pieter, S. et al. Unexpected Westward range shifts in European forest plants link to nitrogen deposition. Science 386, 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado0878 (2024).