Share.

3 Comments

  1. Once they get the other launch pad up and running, they will be launching many more launches, so it makes sense.

  2. [Here’s the original article, published by the Orlando Sentinel](https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2025/09/03/spacex-gets-faa-ok-to-jack-up-canaverals-falcon-9-launches-from-50-to-120/).

    It’s the same article, but with a different picture (a Falcon 9 RTLS landing). There’s a lot more links to Sentinel articles within in the article. There’s a contact email and a little picture for the author.

    Phys.org is a content aggregator. They copy free-as-in-beer and licensed (like this) content and republish it with their own ads, tracking, etc. Normally the original article is a better browsing experience – but with a newspaper, you’re probably getting the same or more ads/tracking as with phys.org. So I’d call this a draw. Pick your poison.

    Perhaps you’d prefer to support the newspaper paying the author more directly, rather than indirectly through phys.org’s distributor (which has three organizations instead of one).