It’s the same article, but with a different picture (a Falcon 9 RTLS landing). There’s a lot more links to Sentinel articles within in the article. There’s a contact email and a little picture for the author.
Phys.org is a content aggregator. They copy free-as-in-beer and licensed (like this) content and republish it with their own ads, tracking, etc. Normally the original article is a better browsing experience – but with a newspaper, you’re probably getting the same or more ads/tracking as with phys.org. So I’d call this a draw. Pick your poison.
Perhaps you’d prefer to support the newspaper paying the author more directly, rather than indirectly through phys.org’s distributor (which has three organizations instead of one).
3 Comments
A Launch every 3 days….hummm let’s take that already boring JAFSL and make it totally banal.
Once they get the other launch pad up and running, they will be launching many more launches, so it makes sense.
[Here’s the original article, published by the Orlando Sentinel](https://www.orlandosentinel.com/2025/09/03/spacex-gets-faa-ok-to-jack-up-canaverals-falcon-9-launches-from-50-to-120/).
It’s the same article, but with a different picture (a Falcon 9 RTLS landing). There’s a lot more links to Sentinel articles within in the article. There’s a contact email and a little picture for the author.
Phys.org is a content aggregator. They copy free-as-in-beer and licensed (like this) content and republish it with their own ads, tracking, etc. Normally the original article is a better browsing experience – but with a newspaper, you’re probably getting the same or more ads/tracking as with phys.org. So I’d call this a draw. Pick your poison.
Perhaps you’d prefer to support the newspaper paying the author more directly, rather than indirectly through phys.org’s distributor (which has three organizations instead of one).