Share.

36 Comments

  1. I really enjoy the second chart showing how the Browns are as exceptionally bad as the Patriots are exceptionally good.

  2. As a Bears fan….. I don’t understand why we aren’t here? Or are we that bad that we don’t even classify for mediocre and are just plain terrible? Hehehe

  3. My dad grew up a Vikings fan and moved to Arizona to spend the rest of his life as a cardinals fan too. Needless to say I don’t think he was ever very happy as a fan.

  4. tallwhiteninja on

    The 49ers, meanwhile, vacillate between Super Bowl contenders and absolute garbage with no in-betweens.

  5. The Browns have really distanced themselves from the competition, literally. They are further away from the next closest team in win % than any other team, though not quite enough to be a statistical outlier.

  6. pedanticPandaPoo on

    Not sure the first two graphs are aligned. I would have expected the first graph to just be a radial score of the second graph centered around 50% win percentage and 0 std dev, meaning the dolphins and bills would be 1 & 2. Chargers std dev is much higher, so why are they the most consistently mediocre?

  7. The Josh Allen era made the Bills go from straight ass to mediocre.

    A couple more seasons and he brings the franchise above .500 all time as well.

  8. As a saints fan, I’ve been diligently preparing my “Aint’s” paper bag to wear over my head. It’s tradition at this point.

  9. I’d like to see this on a shorter time frame, like maybe the last 10-15 years. I feel like there have been dramatic changes to the game recently that have made the QB position way more important and some of that gets lost by the time frame.

  10. The first chart is pretty useless tbh. There’s no explanation of what mediocrity score means and the distance between bars is so low, that it looks like barely any difference between them. We also have no comparison to a non mediocre team; like is there a big difference between the least mediocre and most mediocre?

    The second chart is more useful but I would personally say the most mediocre team (based on that chart) are the dolphins. They are close to .50 and they have the lowest standard deviation, meaning they are consistently very close to .50, even season to season. Whereas some of the other mediocre teams have higher variance because they have had winning seasons, which seems less mediocre to me.

  11. As a born and bred lions fan, I looked at the first slide and was shocked we weren’t on there. Even with our success the last couple of seasons… in still mostly used to being hurt

  12. 🙋🏻‍♂️Cowboys “fan”. Wish I wasn’t. The good thing about 30 years of mediocrity is if any fans of a rival talk shit about em I can just agree with em and it shuts it down. Cant hurt me bro. Im dead inside.

  13. As someone who watches a lot of football and knows these teams very well, the data just doesn’t seem equal to these teams being the “most mediocre”. You have the Broncos and Saints who have won a Super Bowl in this timeframe as well as the Bengals and Cardinals who went to the Super Bowl.

    The Commanders have hardly been a playoff team in this timeframe and just got to the NFCCG for the first time in over 30 years.

    I would say that the only teams this properly fits would be the Chargers, Cowboys, Vikings, and maybe the Bengals.

    It’s hard to call the Broncos mediocre in this timeframe when they have gone to 2 Super Bowls, won 1 Super Bowl, and had an 8 year playoff drought all in the same timeframe. That’s the opposite of consistently mediocre, that’s polar opposite.

  14. jesusmansuperpowers on

    Nope. Most of these are good sometimes bad others. Mediocre all the time is way more of a Steelers thing than the Bengals who were awful for ages then had a few good seasons a decade apart.