That’s quite a niche thing to ban people from being and a knee-jerk reaction to recent controversies – not to mention difficult to keep track of and enforce
hgjayhvkk on
I mean… if they have spouse or family members then it can be rigged. Buts its a good thought.
Caephon on
It would be a step in the right direction but there need to be overall drastic reforms on what MP’s can and can’t do and can and can’t be. It is downright silly that we allow non-citizens to vote, let alone become a member of parliament in this country and that needs to change as well.
narayan77 on
Tokenism, how does that help the housing situation.
FudgeAtron on
IMO all MPs should be banned from any income other than their salary. They should be intelligible for any work not related to their job.
No newspapers, no TV, no Radio, they should have to put their businesses in a trust, and be subjected to regular audits to make sure their finances are in order and they aren’t cheating.
In return, they should get a big fat pay bump, so that their salaries are more competitive and will attract better talent. I’d also give them access to a big dorm they can stay in while working in London for no extra charge, removing the need for a second home.
MondeyMondey on
Yeah. Then ban everyone else! Evil way of making a living
somedave on
So their spouses can? Their families? Doesn’t really seem like it’ll work practically and won’t help much. Just a knee jerk reaction that’ll be rejected.
gapgod2001 on
We need better MPs. Adding unnecessary restrictions to MPs is just going to push away successful people.
april9th on
Pure political theatre, something that will never happen, and even removing that barrier, is putting the cart before the horse.
Landlords are a problem because we aren’t building anywhere near enough. If we did, the incentive to be one would weaken and many would sell their ‘investment’.
The left needs proactive policy, not reactive. It needs expansive policy, not restrictive.
This is policy that is meant to elicit one feeling, spite. It is also impotent.
The allure of a new left party is supposed to be an ungagged expression of actual left policy. All as have had so part is the expression of just to what degree the left is totally in the wilderness again.
This isn’t policy. It’s saying you’d tell ‘elites’ off. It’s also misdirection given it relies entirely on something that’ll never happen. Waste of time and breath. Will these people ever try to inspire?
ShufflingToGlory on
Excellent policy. No wonder the establishment are so hostile to her.
TheBlakeOfUs on
This is a perfectly sensible and rational statement.
So naturally she’ll be attacked by the free speech warriors who believe all speech should be protected, except for speech they don’t agree with
BecomingABetterDude on
Well really if you are an MP, you shouldn’t be having multiple jobs, and I’d say being a landlord is a secondary job
Hitching-galaxy on
Great idea.
Or, if they are landlords, they should not be allowed to vote a for something in their own interests (ie, against renters bill etc)
Pandita666 on
What about all the other stuff they can do? If they are barred from being landlords they should be from any other form of money making outside their salary. Osborne was editor of a fucking newspaper in a different city!
andrew0256 on
She’s being a bit selective. I assume she would have no problem with them being lawyers, doctors, journalists, or general business people, but because they’re evil landlords they should be barred.
There is a good argument to be made for banning MPs from second jobs, although their pay would have to rise considerably if you want a full range of talented people in Parliament.
blueb0g on
V sensible. But her fellow Your Party/independent group MP Adnan Hussain is a landlord so she’s slamming her own party as much as she is her ex party.
jodrellbank_pants on
Should convert one of the tower blocks in London just for
MP’s to live in only for their time in office once there de selected their out
No referb for 20 years or more.
A set wage at market rates
all expenses go through and independent none related party company.
Any expense over 250 to be pre authorised by 3 independent individuals
All tickets and travel bought from the public sector
Zero involvement in any other company or backhanded payment instant sacking and criminal proceedings
AzureVive on
Good policy on paper. Generally for all income. I fear it’ll be maligned or poorly implemented. Though no Corbyn party is getting to sniff at power anyway.
NewPhoneWhoDispair on
Or, just do a land value tax instead and ban foreign investors owning land. Easier and makes us money. Someone has to own them.
TheCharalampos on
Agreed. Any source of income risks someone being biased towards benefiting this. A landlord would struggle to pass laws that would go against landlords, etc.
JayR_97 on
Yeah, its absolutely a massive conflict of interest that people who own and rent out properties get to make the laws for the rental market.
Gold_Motor_6985 on
I really don’t like how we’re starting to mirror US politics, with a bonkers right wing party (Reform/Cons), a centrist, useful but weak and ineffectual “left” party (Labour), and a couple of left wing MPs with some actual ideas shouting from the side (Sultana/Corbyn.)
fuck.
Haunting-Motor1303 on
There are some fabulous ideas here but unfortunately the incumbent MP’s would need to vote to do away with their gravy train. Politics stinks, accepting party donations and not favouring the donor they either think the public are thick or they don’t care. The difference between the parties seems to be the colour of the rosette. One job one income
SirDogbert on
Being a landlord is not such a massive financial stretch these days. it’s pretty cheap and accessible.
24 Comments
That’s quite a niche thing to ban people from being and a knee-jerk reaction to recent controversies – not to mention difficult to keep track of and enforce
I mean… if they have spouse or family members then it can be rigged. Buts its a good thought.
It would be a step in the right direction but there need to be overall drastic reforms on what MP’s can and can’t do and can and can’t be. It is downright silly that we allow non-citizens to vote, let alone become a member of parliament in this country and that needs to change as well.
Tokenism, how does that help the housing situation.
IMO all MPs should be banned from any income other than their salary. They should be intelligible for any work not related to their job.
No newspapers, no TV, no Radio, they should have to put their businesses in a trust, and be subjected to regular audits to make sure their finances are in order and they aren’t cheating.
In return, they should get a big fat pay bump, so that their salaries are more competitive and will attract better talent. I’d also give them access to a big dorm they can stay in while working in London for no extra charge, removing the need for a second home.
Yeah. Then ban everyone else! Evil way of making a living
So their spouses can? Their families? Doesn’t really seem like it’ll work practically and won’t help much. Just a knee jerk reaction that’ll be rejected.
We need better MPs. Adding unnecessary restrictions to MPs is just going to push away successful people.
Pure political theatre, something that will never happen, and even removing that barrier, is putting the cart before the horse.
Landlords are a problem because we aren’t building anywhere near enough. If we did, the incentive to be one would weaken and many would sell their ‘investment’.
The left needs proactive policy, not reactive. It needs expansive policy, not restrictive.
This is policy that is meant to elicit one feeling, spite. It is also impotent.
The allure of a new left party is supposed to be an ungagged expression of actual left policy. All as have had so part is the expression of just to what degree the left is totally in the wilderness again.
This isn’t policy. It’s saying you’d tell ‘elites’ off. It’s also misdirection given it relies entirely on something that’ll never happen. Waste of time and breath. Will these people ever try to inspire?
Excellent policy. No wonder the establishment are so hostile to her.
This is a perfectly sensible and rational statement.
So naturally she’ll be attacked by the free speech warriors who believe all speech should be protected, except for speech they don’t agree with
Well really if you are an MP, you shouldn’t be having multiple jobs, and I’d say being a landlord is a secondary job
Great idea.
Or, if they are landlords, they should not be allowed to vote a for something in their own interests (ie, against renters bill etc)
What about all the other stuff they can do? If they are barred from being landlords they should be from any other form of money making outside their salary. Osborne was editor of a fucking newspaper in a different city!
She’s being a bit selective. I assume she would have no problem with them being lawyers, doctors, journalists, or general business people, but because they’re evil landlords they should be barred.
There is a good argument to be made for banning MPs from second jobs, although their pay would have to rise considerably if you want a full range of talented people in Parliament.
V sensible. But her fellow Your Party/independent group MP Adnan Hussain is a landlord so she’s slamming her own party as much as she is her ex party.
Should convert one of the tower blocks in London just for
MP’s to live in only for their time in office once there de selected their out
No referb for 20 years or more.
A set wage at market rates
all expenses go through and independent none related party company.
Any expense over 250 to be pre authorised by 3 independent individuals
All tickets and travel bought from the public sector
Zero involvement in any other company or backhanded payment instant sacking and criminal proceedings
Good policy on paper. Generally for all income. I fear it’ll be maligned or poorly implemented. Though no Corbyn party is getting to sniff at power anyway.
Or, just do a land value tax instead and ban foreign investors owning land. Easier and makes us money. Someone has to own them.
Agreed. Any source of income risks someone being biased towards benefiting this. A landlord would struggle to pass laws that would go against landlords, etc.
Yeah, its absolutely a massive conflict of interest that people who own and rent out properties get to make the laws for the rental market.
I really don’t like how we’re starting to mirror US politics, with a bonkers right wing party (Reform/Cons), a centrist, useful but weak and ineffectual “left” party (Labour), and a couple of left wing MPs with some actual ideas shouting from the side (Sultana/Corbyn.)
fuck.
There are some fabulous ideas here but unfortunately the incumbent MP’s would need to vote to do away with their gravy train. Politics stinks, accepting party donations and not favouring the donor they either think the public are thick or they don’t care. The difference between the parties seems to be the colour of the rosette. One job one income
Being a landlord is not such a massive financial stretch these days. it’s pretty cheap and accessible.