A new report finds China’s space program will soon equal that of the US and overtake it in the next five to ten years “if we don’t do something”

https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/09/a-new-report-finds-chinas-space-program-will-soon-equal-that-of-the-us/?utm_campaign=dhtwitter&utm_content=%3Cmedia_url%3E&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Share.

49 Comments

  1. started_from_the_top on

    I don’t care which country’s space program is the best, I just want as much new information/discoveries about space as possible.

  2. A little misinformation here, a little disinformation there, a few bots to amplify: voila, a country willingly cedes it’s position on the world stage.

    Congrats, China, I bet you didn’t think it’d be this easy.

  3. If China has the political will and engineering prowess to build space stations, explore the Moon, Mars and beyond… Good for them!

  4. realitychange17 on

    If you compare state efforts, it may be true.

    BUT!! You dont take into account that in the U.S. innovation doesnt primarily come from the state (as in China). Putting together all the private efforts that the U.S. have plus NASA, they are years ahead of China.

    If you are only comparing NASA agains CNSA, then the article may hold true.

    The U.S. is the only country in the world with a profitable space company. This kind of commercial viability gives it a lot of advantage.

  5. Clearly, the US sees keeping its mass shootings high as a bigger priority than space and renewable energy.

    BTW, China is already well ahead of US on renewable energy because US still thinks that coal is the way of the future apparently.

  6. Let’s be honest… Under Trump America is no longer the superpower it once was and everyone knows it….. That’s why Putin has behaved the way he has and Japan has told Trump they’re not upping tariffs on China and to stick his tariffs up his arse.

  7. Tumbleweed-Artistic on

    The damage is already done, this ship sailed like 6 months ago. Thousands of NASA employees & contractors have been fired, left for other jobs, or retired much earlier than they would have. The vast majority will not come back even if funding is restored. China and ESA will overtake NASA in very short order.

  8. We *are* doing something. We’re getting rid of NASA. By removing all public funding, we encourage the amazing potential of capitalism, and private companies. As soon as NASA is no longer a threat to their profit margins, we will see dozens of space-age companies popping up and rocket launching us to the moon, and beyond. Those companies will naturally compete with each other over those available profits, driving massive innovation. We’ll see a colony on Mars in less time than it takes to get there!

    Oh

    And in case it’s needed

    /s

  9. It is a good thing then that the president just reclassified NASA as a spy agency, and then asked to have every mission with the word ‘climate’ in it to be outright cancelled, no matter the project complete percentage. /sigh

  10. Reasonable-Can1730 on

    People worry about China on the Moon, but the U.S. space program is far from stagnant. SpaceX is literally working toward a sustained habitat on Mars . That’s not theory, that’s funded rockets and test flights happening now. So while China may push for a foothold on the Moon, U.S. ambitions are still larger in scope. The real conversation isn’t who touches down first, but who sustains presence and writes the rules for resources and long term infrastructure.

  11. Cutting its funding, removing all personnel that dont have MAGA viewpoints, creating “Space Force” and focussing on weaponising NASA over it being a scientific organisation is pretty much gonna end its progression as an entity.

  12. Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    |Fewer Letters|More Letters|
    |——-|———|—|
    |[CNSA](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekbjdr “Last usage”)|Chinese National Space Administration|
    |[DoD](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekkcz0 “Last usage”)|US Department of Defense|
    |[ESA](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nel0mn4 “Last usage”)|European Space Agency|
    |[GSLV](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nel7sr4 “Last usage”)|Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle|
    |[HALO](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nel8nvz “Last usage”)|Habitation and Logistics Outpost|
    |[HLS](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekxpjc “Last usage”)|[Human Landing System](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program#Human_Landing_System) (Artemis)|
    |[ISRU](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nel5qgb “Last usage”)|[In-Situ Resource Utilization](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_situ_resource_utilization)|
    |[ITAR](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nek8iql “Last usage”)|(US) International Traffic in Arms Regulations|
    |[JAXA](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nel0mn4 “Last usage”)|Japan Aerospace eXploration Agency|
    |[LEO](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekg7y2 “Last usage”)|Low Earth Orbit (180-2000km)|
    | |Law Enforcement Officer (most often mentioned during transport operations)|
    |[NOAA](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/neka6o5 “Last usage”)|National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, responsible for US ~~generation~~ monitoring of the climate|
    |[SLS](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekoip0 “Last usage”)|Space Launch System heavy-lift|
    |[SRB](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekinza “Last usage”)|Solid Rocket Booster|
    |[TCM](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekub1u “Last usage”)|Trajectory Correction Maneuver|

    |Jargon|Definition|
    |——-|———|—|
    |[Raptor](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nel5qgb “Last usage”)|[Methane-fueled rocket engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raptor_(rocket_engine_family)) under development by SpaceX|
    |[Starlink](/r/Space/comments/1ninmd2/stub/nekssqg “Last usage”)|SpaceX’s world-wide satellite broadband constellation|

    Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.

    —————-
    ^([Thread #11673 for this sub, first seen 16th Sep 2025, 18:23])
    ^[[FAQ]](http://decronym.xyz/) [^([Full list])](http://decronym.xyz/acronyms/Space) [^[Contact]](https://hachyderm.io/@Two9A) [^([Source code])](https://gistdotgithubdotcom/Two9A/1d976f9b7441694162c8)

  13. Internal_Peace_7986 on

    Highly unlikely if you include the billion dollar secret black budget programs! Perhaps the US can let some of that technology compete!

  14. Its handy when you have the 2nd largest gdp in the world. But yet 74th ranked average income for their citizens.

  15. Well they just got a top mathematician that used to live here until he left just recently, so that’ll help them out

  16. Lets continue to defund education and various science grants and start a war with higher education. That’ll help.

  17. whatafuckinusername on

    Regardless of whether it turns out to be true, it seems like people have been saying this for years. Let’s just bring back the funding for our own sake.

  18. We did do something. Trump quietly signed an executive order labeling NASA a spy organization. So, what we did was ensure the defunding of our space program so China could have a better one!

  19. gregor_ivonavich on

    It’s always over little bro who knows how long it will take for science to recover if these fucking freaks are ever ousted.

  20. Good for them! And if we’re lucky, that will hurt politician’s egos badly enough to get them to do something.