Share.

    15 Comments

    1. PackageMedium6955 on

      Funny part is, the Russian SFSR took those lands from Belarus and Ukraine just a year prior to the Polish-Soviet war

    2. Z ruskimi się nie dyskutuje, ruska trzeba lać, bo to jedyny dialog, który potrafią zrozumieć.

      Współpraca z IiI rzeszą na początku wojny to dla nich temat tabu

    3. And by “took from Russia” the meme means invaded the newly independent Ukraine together with Russia and divided it, Molotov-Ribbentrop style.

      In Ukraine the treaty of Riga is called “Riga’s Andrusovo”, after another historical treaty when Poland and Russia divided Ukraine https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truce_of_Andrusovo

      Poland at first signed a “treaty of Warsaw” to help Petliura and Ukraine to fight against Russia, but then backstabbed and decided just partitioning Ukraine would be easier.

    4. JustyourZeratul on

      Actually I remember Lenin signed a decree somewhere in August 1918 proclaiming that all the treaties regarding the Poland partition were denounced.

      So technically the old 1772 year eastern border could be effective again. But Lenin also recognized Ukraine and maybe Belarus, so it probably wasn’t a big deal.

    5. Waste_Candle2429 on

      Żeby te czerwone kurwy, kacapskie psy Putina, zrozumiały przekaz, tym moskalom trzeba mocno zajebać.

    6. Soviets themselves claimed that the Soviet Union IS NOT THE LEGAL SUCCESSOR OF THE EMPIRE OF RUSSIA. So they won’t pay the Russian debts.

    7. “USSR only took back their lands” mfs when you ask them when has Lviv ever been a part of USSR, RSFSR or even the Russian Empire

    8. Not to mention Galicia that was under the Austro – Hungarian empire.

      Same “logic” with the Baltic States, Bessarabia or even central Asia. The soviets were nothing but another iteration of Muscovite imperialism and that’s also why the present Russian imperialists follow when they claim one or another land grab.