The humanoid robotics revolution is real, but it won’t unfold as quickly or smoothly as the hype suggests. The combination of manufacturing bottlenecks, integration complexity, skills shortages, and geopolitical tensions creates a perfect storm of challenges that will slow deployment far below the exponential curves drawn by investment banks.
DeltaForceFish on
Good. Honestly why are we as a species developing technology that makes us redundant? Slow the pace. Take a page from the Romulans.
quix0te on
Just because we’re bipedal doesn’t make it the optimal design for robots. The design will vary by task.
20$ on hexapod.
pinkfootthegoose on
They don’t need to replace you to cause damage, they just need to be an implied threat.
TheWhiteManticore on
You simply can’t violate the laws of physics. Just look at our own body you’d realise how complex and optimised it is over millions of years. To then wanting to design something surpassing that reaching the thermodynamic limit, good luck.
6 Comments
[deleted]
From the article:
The humanoid robotics revolution is real, but it won’t unfold as quickly or smoothly as the hype suggests. The combination of manufacturing bottlenecks, integration complexity, skills shortages, and geopolitical tensions creates a perfect storm of challenges that will slow deployment far below the exponential curves drawn by investment banks.
Good. Honestly why are we as a species developing technology that makes us redundant? Slow the pace. Take a page from the Romulans.
Just because we’re bipedal doesn’t make it the optimal design for robots. The design will vary by task.
20$ on hexapod.
They don’t need to replace you to cause damage, they just need to be an implied threat.
You simply can’t violate the laws of physics. Just look at our own body you’d realise how complex and optimised it is over millions of years. To then wanting to design something surpassing that reaching the thermodynamic limit, good luck.